Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case: “No Direct Evidence Linking the Applicant to Seized Contraband.”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Delhi has granted bail to Lhingneihat Lhouvum, the petitioner in Bail Application 1278/2023, in a case related to the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma on 25th July, 2023.

The case involved Sessions Case No. 09/2021 titled “NCB v. Martin Chikamma Nwokorie & Anr.,” pending before the Special Judge (NDPS), Patiala House, New Delhi. The petitioner, represented by Advocate Mr. Sumit Sharma, sought regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) read with Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Justice Amit Sharma remarked, “The only incriminating material against the applicant is her statement under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which is inadmissible – Mobile phone messages inconclusive – No direct evidence linking the applicant to the seized contraband.” The Court emphasized that there was no record of the petitioner having received any similar consignment in the past.

Furthermore, the Court acknowledged the petitioner’s time in custody, satisfactory jail conduct, and the absence of any other cases against her, stating that the twin conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act were satisfied.

Delhi  Court granted bail to the petitioner upon her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the same amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Link Court. The bail is subject to various conditions, including the requirement to keep mobile numbers operational, intimate the court of any change in residential address, and not leaving India without prior permission.

Date of Decision: 25th July, 2023

LHINGNEIHAT LHOUVUM  vs  IO, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU & ANR

Latest Legal News