Lethargy Is Not an Exceptional Circumstance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Striking Off of Defence for Delay in Filing Written Statement Vague Decree of Injunction Can’t Be Executed by Attaching Machines: Rajasthan High Court Strikes Down Execution Order Mere permission to join proceedings without allowing filing of written statement is illusory: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Proceedings Unregistered Power of Attorney Can’t Transfer Property: MP High Court Denies Title, Dismisses Ejectment Suit Mere Non-Recovery of Weapon Is Not Fatal When Circumstantial and Medical Evidence Prove Guilt Beyond Doubt: Allahabad High Court Failure to Examine Gazetted Officer and Magistrate Who Certified Seizure Goes to Root of Fair Trial Under NDPS Act : Calcutta High Court Tender Years Doctrine Is No Longer Good Law: Delhi High Court Slams Mother’s Custody Claim Built on Parental Alienation Negation of Bail is the Rule in NDPS Cases Involving Commercial Quantity: Himachal Pradesh High Court Denies Bail Single Stab Injury in Heat of Passion During Sudden Quarrel Is Not Murder: Kerala High Court Section 10 CPC Inapplicable To Labour Court Proceedings; Stay Of Individual Disputes Denied: Karnataka High Court 138 NI Act | Once Issuance and Signature on Cheque Are Admitted, Burden Shifts on Accused to Dislodge Statutory Presumption: Madras High Court Confession Cannot Substitute Proof: Bombay High Court Acquits Husband Convicted of Wife’s Murder "Sole Eyewitness Testimony, Corroborated by Medical and Recovery Evidence, Is Enough to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC: Allahabad High Court Partition Once Effected Cannot Be Reopened on Vague Allegations of Fraud: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Registered Family Partition Deed Cancellation of Land Acquisition Compensation Without Allegation or Hearing Is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Restores Compensation to Innocent Land Owner Whether Act Was in Discharge of Official Duty Is a Question of Fact — Magistrate, Not High Court, Must Decide: Supreme Court Restricts Writ Interference in BNSS Cases Section 175(4) BNSS | Affidavit Is Not Optional — Even Complaints Against Public Servants Must Follow Procedural Rigour: Supreme Court Magistrate Cannot Be Directed to Recall His Judicial Order by a Writ Court: Supreme Court Warns Against Article 226 Interference in Pending Criminal Proceedings Even In Absence of Written Demand, If Substantial Dispute Exists or Is Apprehended, Reference Under Section 10 ID Act Is Valid: Supreme Court Absence of Classical Signs of Strangulation and Possibility of Hanging Nullifies Homicidal Theory: Supreme Court Holds Medical Evidence Alone Cannot Prove Guilt Confession Must Be Direct Acknowledgment of Guilt, Not Mere Presence at Scene: Supreme Court Slams Misuse of Section 164 CrPC Reversal of Acquittal Without Dislodging Trial Court’s Reasoning Is Impermissible: Supreme Court Restores Acquittal

High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case: “No Direct Evidence Linking the Applicant to Seized Contraband.”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Delhi has granted bail to Lhingneihat Lhouvum, the petitioner in Bail Application 1278/2023, in a case related to the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma on 25th July, 2023.

The case involved Sessions Case No. 09/2021 titled “NCB v. Martin Chikamma Nwokorie & Anr.,” pending before the Special Judge (NDPS), Patiala House, New Delhi. The petitioner, represented by Advocate Mr. Sumit Sharma, sought regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) read with Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Justice Amit Sharma remarked, “The only incriminating material against the applicant is her statement under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which is inadmissible – Mobile phone messages inconclusive – No direct evidence linking the applicant to the seized contraband.” The Court emphasized that there was no record of the petitioner having received any similar consignment in the past.

Furthermore, the Court acknowledged the petitioner’s time in custody, satisfactory jail conduct, and the absence of any other cases against her, stating that the twin conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act were satisfied.

Delhi  Court granted bail to the petitioner upon her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the same amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Link Court. The bail is subject to various conditions, including the requirement to keep mobile numbers operational, intimate the court of any change in residential address, and not leaving India without prior permission.

Date of Decision: 25th July, 2023

LHINGNEIHAT LHOUVUM  vs  IO, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU & ANR

Latest Legal News