Subsequent Declaration Of Juvenility Does Not Vitiate Conviction On Merits: Supreme Court Borrowers Cannot Ignore Bank Accounting Systems And Suspense Accounts To Claim Arbitrary Reductions In Loan Dues: Supreme Court Re-employed Judicial Officers Cannot Claim 6th Pay Commission Scales: Supreme Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Erroneously Exercising Review Jurisdiction On 'Mistaken Notion', Restores Employee's ACP Benefits Trademark Infringement: Defendant Can Cross-Examine Plaintiff On Use Of Brand Name Even If Written Statement Is Not On Record: Supreme Court 'Interest And Welfare Of Child Would Be Best Served': Supreme Court Invokes Parens Patriae In Contempt Plea; Revokes Own Custody Order Mere Absence From MCA Records Cannot Absolve Accused Under Section 138 NI Act If Prima Facie Role Is Shown: Punjab & Haryana High Court Incomplete Or Defective Real Estate Application Cannot Claim Deemed Registration Under Section 5(2) Of RERA Act: Orissa High Court Mere Criminal Antecedents Cannot Justify Invoking 'Organized Crime' Offence Under Section 111 BNS Without Fulfilling Statutory Ingredients: Madhya Pradesh High Court 'Testator's Character & Prior Gifts Justify Unequal Distribution': Madras High Court Upholds Holographic Will Minority Status Cannot Arrest Limitation Period For Appeal If Minor Was Represented By Natural Guardian In Original Proceedings: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Admission Of Property Boundaries In Family Partition Deeds Destroys Coparceners' Claim That Land Remains Joint Ancestral Property: Karnataka High Court Mesne Profits Must Reflect Open Market Letting Value Rather Than Static Contractual Rates: Delhi High Court Law Graduates Who Fail To Clear AIBE Within Two Years Cannot Practice In Any Court, Tribunal Or Revenue Authority: Allahabad High Court Bombay High Court Slams 'Growing Tendency' To Bypass GST Appeals, Says 'Natural Justice' Not A Blanket Excuse For Writ Petitions Proportionate Cost Only Can Be Awarded On Decreed Amount, Not On Total Plaint Valuation: Kerala High Court

High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case: “No Direct Evidence Linking the Applicant to Seized Contraband.”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Delhi has granted bail to Lhingneihat Lhouvum, the petitioner in Bail Application 1278/2023, in a case related to the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma on 25th July, 2023.

The case involved Sessions Case No. 09/2021 titled “NCB v. Martin Chikamma Nwokorie & Anr.,” pending before the Special Judge (NDPS), Patiala House, New Delhi. The petitioner, represented by Advocate Mr. Sumit Sharma, sought regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) read with Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Justice Amit Sharma remarked, “The only incriminating material against the applicant is her statement under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which is inadmissible – Mobile phone messages inconclusive – No direct evidence linking the applicant to the seized contraband.” The Court emphasized that there was no record of the petitioner having received any similar consignment in the past.

Furthermore, the Court acknowledged the petitioner’s time in custody, satisfactory jail conduct, and the absence of any other cases against her, stating that the twin conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act were satisfied.

Delhi  Court granted bail to the petitioner upon her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the same amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Link Court. The bail is subject to various conditions, including the requirement to keep mobile numbers operational, intimate the court of any change in residential address, and not leaving India without prior permission.

Date of Decision: 25th July, 2023

LHINGNEIHAT LHOUVUM  vs  IO, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU & ANR

Latest Legal News