Writ Jurisdiction Not Appropriate For Adjudicating Complex Title Disputes; Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Madhya Pradesh High Court Joint Account Holder Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act If Not A Signatory To Dishonoured Cheque: Allahabad High Court Private Individuals Accepting Money Can Be Prosecuted Under MPID Act; Nomenclature As 'Loan' Irrelevant: Supreme Court Nomenclature Of Transaction As 'Loan' Irrelevant; If Ingredients Met, It Is A 'Deposit' Under MPID Act: Supreme Court Pleadings Must State Material Facts, Not Evidence; Deficiency In Pleading Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal: Supreme Court Denial Of Remission Cannot Rest Solely On Heinousness Of Crime; Justice Doesn't Permit Permanent Incarceration In Shadow Of Worst Act: Supreme Court Second Application For Rejection Of Plaint Barred By Res Judicata If Earlier Order Attained Finality: Supreme Court Section 6(5) Hindu Succession Act Is A Saving Clause, Not A Jurisdictional Bar To Partition Suits: Supreme Court Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court Areas Urbanised Before 1959 Don't Require Separate Notification To Fall Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Delhi High Court Police Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts To Perform Compensatory Justice; Direct Nexus With Offence Essential: Bombay High Court FSL Probe Before Electronic Evidence Meets Section 65B Admissibility Standards: Gujarat High Court Court Shouldn't Adjudicate Rights At Stage Of Granting Leave Under Section 92 CPC, Only Prima Facie Case Required: Allahabad High Court Right To Seek Bail Based On Non-Furnishing Of 'Grounds Of Arrest' Applies Only Prospectively From November 6, 2025: Madras High Court Prior Exposure To Accused Before TIP Renders Identification Meaningless: Delhi High Court Acquits Four In Uphaar Cinema Murder Case No Particular Format Prescribed For 'Proposed Resolution' In No-Confidence Motion; Intention Of Members To Be Gathered From Document As A Whole: Orissa High Court Trial Court Cannot Grant Temporary Injunction Without Adverting To Allegations Of Fraud And Collusion: Calcutta High Court "Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court

High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case: “No Direct Evidence Linking the Applicant to Seized Contraband.”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Delhi has granted bail to Lhingneihat Lhouvum, the petitioner in Bail Application 1278/2023, in a case related to the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma on 25th July, 2023.

The case involved Sessions Case No. 09/2021 titled “NCB v. Martin Chikamma Nwokorie & Anr.,” pending before the Special Judge (NDPS), Patiala House, New Delhi. The petitioner, represented by Advocate Mr. Sumit Sharma, sought regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) read with Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Justice Amit Sharma remarked, “The only incriminating material against the applicant is her statement under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which is inadmissible – Mobile phone messages inconclusive – No direct evidence linking the applicant to the seized contraband.” The Court emphasized that there was no record of the petitioner having received any similar consignment in the past.

Furthermore, the Court acknowledged the petitioner’s time in custody, satisfactory jail conduct, and the absence of any other cases against her, stating that the twin conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act were satisfied.

Delhi  Court granted bail to the petitioner upon her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the same amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Link Court. The bail is subject to various conditions, including the requirement to keep mobile numbers operational, intimate the court of any change in residential address, and not leaving India without prior permission.

Date of Decision: 25th July, 2023

LHINGNEIHAT LHOUVUM  vs  IO, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU & ANR

Latest Legal News