Benefit Of Acquittal Can Be Extended To Non-Appealing Co-Accused If Prosecution Case Is Found To Be Fundamentally Unreliable: Madras High Court Hindu Marriage Act | Petition For Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Serves As A Valid Defence Against Allegations Of Desertion: Kerala High Court Employee Has No Vested Right To Seek Or Retain Additional Charge; Writ Petition Not Maintainable To Challenge Its Withdrawal: Madhya Pradesh High Court Insurance Act | Insurer Cannot Waive Statutory Deadline For Premium Payment Under Bank Guarantee; No Estoppel Against Statute: NCDRC Absence Of Crime Number In Inquest Report & Discrepancy In Sec 157 CrPC Special Report Renders FIR Doubtful: Allahabad High Court MTP Act  | Termination Of Pregnancy Beyond 24 Weeks Permissible If It Involves Risk To Life Or Grave Injury To Mental Health Of The Victim: Gujarat High Court Section 174A IPC | FIR Cannot Be Quashed If Process Server Reports Indicate Failure To Serve At Ordinary Residence: Delhi High Court Issues Guidelines Insolvency Petition | Transferees Of Debtor Cannot Substitute Debtor To Rebut Allegation Of Intent To Defeat Creditors Under Section 6(b) Provincial Insolvency Act: High Court Medical Negligence | Doctor Cannot Be Held Liable For Choosing One Reasonable Course Of Treatment Over Another: Bombay High Court Cruelty | Non-Registration Of FIR Cannot Be Ground To Discredit Testimony Of Wife Seeking Divorce: Jharkhand High Court No Deception At Inception: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Revive Cheating Charges Against Borrower After One-Time Settlement Consumer Protection Act | Doctrine Of 'Caveat Emptor' Subservient To 'Caveat Venditor'; Auctioneer Liable For Sale Of Encumbered Vehicle: State Commission Section 127 CrPC | Past Compromise Not An Eternal Estoppel To Bar Wife From Seeking Enhancement In Maintenance: Orissa High Court States Can Prescribe Higher Qualifications Than UGC Norms, Additional Tests Promote Meritocracy: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cancel Registered Sale Deed Or Adjudicate Title Disputes: Telangana High Court Principal Employer Cannot Abdicate Statutory Liability For Overtime Wages Of Contract Labour Despite Contractual Indemnity Clauses: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory For Invoking SC/ST Act Provisions If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked For Re-valuation Of Structures Once Compensation Dispute Is Adjudicated Under Section 64 RFCTLARR Act: Telangana High Court Revenue Village Naming | Government Must Ensure Names Do Not Reflect Any Person, Caste, Or Religion Under Policy Guidelines: Rajasthan High Court Section 138 NI Act | Complainant Must Prove Proprietorship Of Firm To Establish Status As 'Payee' Or 'Holder In Due Course': Himachal Pradesh High Court

High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Case: “No Direct Evidence Linking the Applicant to Seized Contraband.”

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the High Court of Delhi has granted bail to Lhingneihat Lhouvum, the petitioner in Bail Application 1278/2023, in a case related to the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma on 25th July, 2023.

The case involved Sessions Case No. 09/2021 titled “NCB v. Martin Chikamma Nwokorie & Anr.,” pending before the Special Judge (NDPS), Patiala House, New Delhi. The petitioner, represented by Advocate Mr. Sumit Sharma, sought regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) read with Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Justice Amit Sharma remarked, “The only incriminating material against the applicant is her statement under Section 67 of the NDPS Act which is inadmissible – Mobile phone messages inconclusive – No direct evidence linking the applicant to the seized contraband.” The Court emphasized that there was no record of the petitioner having received any similar consignment in the past.

Furthermore, the Court acknowledged the petitioner’s time in custody, satisfactory jail conduct, and the absence of any other cases against her, stating that the twin conditions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act were satisfied.

Delhi  Court granted bail to the petitioner upon her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the same amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/Link Court. The bail is subject to various conditions, including the requirement to keep mobile numbers operational, intimate the court of any change in residential address, and not leaving India without prior permission.

Date of Decision: 25th July, 2023

LHINGNEIHAT LHOUVUM  vs  IO, NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU & ANR

Latest Legal News