Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Act Case, Cites ‘Limited Role’ and ‘Lack of Direct Evidence’ as Key Factors”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court today granted bail to two individuals, Kashmir alias Mausam and Somdutt Singh alias Shivam, in a case pertaining to violations of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision, articulated by Justice Amit Bansal, underscored crucial legal observations concerning the role and evidence against the accused in drug-related offenses.

The bail applications, linked to Case No. VIII/13,13A/DZU/2020, revolved around charges under Sections 8/22(c)/23/25/29 of the NDPS Act. Both applicants had been in custody since late 2020 and early 2021 respectively, with the case involving the recovery of substantial quantities of psychotropic substances from parcels and an apartment.

In his judgment, Justice Bansal emphasized, “At this stage, it cannot be conclusively said that recoveries were made from the possession of the applicant,” highlighting the uncertainty surrounding the direct involvement of the accused in the alleged offenses. This observation was pivotal in tilting the scales in favor of granting bail.

Further delving into the specifics of the case, the court noted the limited role of one of the applicants, Kashmir @ Mausam, who was primarily involved in packing and delivering medicines. The court observed that the evidence suggested his limited involvement and absence from the apartment at the time of recovery.

Regarding Somdutt Singh, the judgment pointed out the lack of direct recovery of substances from him, relying heavily on the Supreme Court’s precedent in Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu, which questioned the admissibility of confessional statements under Section 67 of the NDPS Act.

The decision also took into account the duration of custody and the conduct of the applicants, along with the principle of parity, as co-accused in the case had already been granted bail.

The bail was granted subject to several conditions, including a personal bond and strict compliance with the investigation process. The court’s careful articulation in this judgment marks a significant moment in the interpretation of the NDPS Act, particularly concerning the roles and evidence required for the continuation of custody in such cases.

Date : 1st December, 2023

SOMDUTT SINGH @ SHIVAM VS NCB

Latest Legal News