Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Appellant in Alleged SC/ST Atrocities Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior granted anticipatory bail to Baldev Singh, aged 64, a pensioner and former Indian Army personnel, who was accused of committing atrocities against a member of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (SC/ST) community. The judgement was delivered by Hon’ble Shri Justice Satyendra Kumar Singh on the 19th of July, 2023.

The appellant had filed Criminal Appeal No. 9087 of 2023 seeking relief after his bail application was rejected by the Special Judge, District Datia, in connection with Crime No. 129/2022 registered at Police Station Dheerpura, District Datia, Madhya Pradesh. The case involved allegations under Sections 294, 323, 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and Section 3(1)(n]/k) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

In the appeal, the appellant’s counsel, Shri Ravi Gupta, argued that Baldev Singh was innocent and falsely implicated in the matter. He claimed that prior to the alleged incident, there were instances of abuse and threats from the complainant and his son, which led to the appellant lodging an FIR (No. 130/2022) against them. The counsel highlighted that the ingredients of the SC/ST Act were not applicable to the case and that the other charges were bailable offenses.

In a significant excerpt from the judgement, Hon’ble Shri Justice Satyendra Kumar Singh observed, “Having considered the rival submissions, the counter FIR, and the earlier complaints made by the appellant against the complainant, so also the contents of the FIR of this case with regard to the allegations relating to SC/ST Act and considering other facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting anything on merits of the case, in view of this Court, appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail.”

The Court directed Baldev Singh to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with a solvent surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority/Investigating Officer upon his arrest or surrender. The appellant was also required to make himself available for interrogation and cooperate with the investigation. The Court emphasized that its observations would not affect the proceedings in the lower court.

The case raised important questions about the application of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the grant of anticipatory bail in such matters. The judgement offers valuable insights into the factors considered by the High Court while deciding on the appellant’s plea.

Date of Decision: 19th July, 2023

BALDEV SINGH VS STATE OF M.P

Similar News