Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Appellant in Alleged SC/ST Atrocities Case

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior granted anticipatory bail to Baldev Singh, aged 64, a pensioner and former Indian Army personnel, who was accused of committing atrocities against a member of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (SC/ST) community. The judgement was delivered by Hon’ble Shri Justice Satyendra Kumar Singh on the 19th of July, 2023.

The appellant had filed Criminal Appeal No. 9087 of 2023 seeking relief after his bail application was rejected by the Special Judge, District Datia, in connection with Crime No. 129/2022 registered at Police Station Dheerpura, District Datia, Madhya Pradesh. The case involved allegations under Sections 294, 323, 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and Section 3(1)(n]/k) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

In the appeal, the appellant’s counsel, Shri Ravi Gupta, argued that Baldev Singh was innocent and falsely implicated in the matter. He claimed that prior to the alleged incident, there were instances of abuse and threats from the complainant and his son, which led to the appellant lodging an FIR (No. 130/2022) against them. The counsel highlighted that the ingredients of the SC/ST Act were not applicable to the case and that the other charges were bailable offenses.

In a significant excerpt from the judgement, Hon’ble Shri Justice Satyendra Kumar Singh observed, “Having considered the rival submissions, the counter FIR, and the earlier complaints made by the appellant against the complainant, so also the contents of the FIR of this case with regard to the allegations relating to SC/ST Act and considering other facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting anything on merits of the case, in view of this Court, appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail.”

The Court directed Baldev Singh to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with a solvent surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority/Investigating Officer upon his arrest or surrender. The appellant was also required to make himself available for interrogation and cooperate with the investigation. The Court emphasized that its observations would not affect the proceedings in the lower court.

The case raised important questions about the application of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the grant of anticipatory bail in such matters. The judgement offers valuable insights into the factors considered by the High Court while deciding on the appellant’s plea.

Date of Decision: 19th July, 2023

BALDEV SINGH VS STATE OF M.P

Latest Legal News