Gratuity Is a Property Right, Not a Charity: MP High Court Upholds Gratuity Claims of Long-Term Contract Workers Seized Vehicles Must Not Be Left to Rot in Open Yards: Madras High Court Invokes Article 21, Orders Release of Vehicle Seized in Illegal Quarrying Case Even After Talaq And A Settlement, A Divorced Muslim Woman Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CRPC: Kerala High Court Bail Cannot Be Withheld as Punishment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail to Govt Official in ₹200 Cr. Scholarship Scam Citing Delay and Article 21 Violation Custodial Interrogation Necessary in Serious Economic Offences: Delhi High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹1.91 Cr Housing Scam Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Not Every Middleman Is a Trafficker: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail in International Cyber Trafficking Case, Cites Absence of Mens Rea Stay in One Corner Freezes the Whole Map: Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Decades-Old Land Acquisition Despite 11-Year Delay in Award Parole Once Granted Cannot Be Made Illusory by Imposing Impossible Conditions: Rajasthan High Court Declares Mechanical Surety Requirement for Indigent Convicts Unconstitutional Once Acquisition Is Complete, Title Disputes Fall Outside Civil Court Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Appeal Lies Against Lok Adalat Compromise Decree Even on Grounds of Fraud: Orissa High Court Declares First Appeal Not Maintainable Sanction to Prosecute Under UAPA Cannot Be a Mechanical Act: Supreme Court Quashes Jharkhand Government’s Third-Time Sanction Without New Evidence FIRs in Corruption Cases Cannot Be Quashed on Hyper-Technical Grounds of Police Station Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores ACB Investigations Quashed by Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Completion of Ayurvedic Nursing Training Does Not Confer Right to Appointment: Supreme Court Rejects Legitimate Expectation Claim by Trainees University’s Error Can’t Cost a Student Her Future: Supreme Court Directs Manav Bharti University to Issue Withheld Degree and Marksheets Due to Clerical Mistake Disciplinary Exoneration Cannot Shield Public Servant from Criminal Trial in Corruption Cases: Supreme Court Customs Tariff Act | ‘End Use’ and ‘Common Parlance’ Tests Cannot Override Statutory Context: Supreme Court Classifies Mushroom Shelves as ‘Aluminium Structures’ Supreme Court Allows PIL Against Limited Maternity Benefits for Adoptive Mothers to Continue Under New Social Security Code Liberty Cannot Wait for Endless Trials: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Wadhawan Brothers in ₹57,000 Crore DHFL Scam Co-Sharer Has Superior Right of Pre-emption Even If Land Is Gair Mumkin Bara: Punjab & Haryana High Court Neighbours Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC Merely For Alleged Instigation: Karnataka High Court No Party Has a Right to Demand a Local Commissioner — It's Purely the Court’s Discretion: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Civil Revision

High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Appellant in Alleged SC/ST Atrocities Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior granted anticipatory bail to Baldev Singh, aged 64, a pensioner and former Indian Army personnel, who was accused of committing atrocities against a member of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (SC/ST) community. The judgement was delivered by Hon’ble Shri Justice Satyendra Kumar Singh on the 19th of July, 2023.

The appellant had filed Criminal Appeal No. 9087 of 2023 seeking relief after his bail application was rejected by the Special Judge, District Datia, in connection with Crime No. 129/2022 registered at Police Station Dheerpura, District Datia, Madhya Pradesh. The case involved allegations under Sections 294, 323, 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and Section 3(1)(n]/k) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

In the appeal, the appellant’s counsel, Shri Ravi Gupta, argued that Baldev Singh was innocent and falsely implicated in the matter. He claimed that prior to the alleged incident, there were instances of abuse and threats from the complainant and his son, which led to the appellant lodging an FIR (No. 130/2022) against them. The counsel highlighted that the ingredients of the SC/ST Act were not applicable to the case and that the other charges were bailable offenses.

In a significant excerpt from the judgement, Hon’ble Shri Justice Satyendra Kumar Singh observed, “Having considered the rival submissions, the counter FIR, and the earlier complaints made by the appellant against the complainant, so also the contents of the FIR of this case with regard to the allegations relating to SC/ST Act and considering other facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting anything on merits of the case, in view of this Court, appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail.”

The Court directed Baldev Singh to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with a solvent surety to the satisfaction of the Arresting Authority/Investigating Officer upon his arrest or surrender. The appellant was also required to make himself available for interrogation and cooperate with the investigation. The Court emphasized that its observations would not affect the proceedings in the lower court.

The case raised important questions about the application of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the grant of anticipatory bail in such matters. The judgement offers valuable insights into the factors considered by the High Court while deciding on the appellant’s plea.

Date of Decision: 19th July, 2023

BALDEV SINGH VS STATE OF M.P

Latest Legal News