Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail to ASI in Bribery Case: Serious Economic Offences Require Custodial Interrogation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, dismissed the anticipatory bail petition of ASI Kulwant Singh, involved in a bribery case under FIR No. 23 dated 09.09.2023. The petitioner, an Assistant Sub-Inspector in the Punjab Police, faced serious allegations of demanding and accepting a bribe.

The Court, in its decision on 12th January 2024, underlined the severity of economic offences and the necessity of custodial interrogation. Justice Chitkara observed, "The investigation is being conducted by the police department, which is the parent organization of the petitioner and it would be appropriate to refer to the serious allegations against the petitioner in the present FIR."

The case (CRM-M-63706-2023) highlighted the alleged demand of Rs. 50,000 as a bribe by the petitioner from the complainant, Bhuvan Singh, and the acceptance of Rs. 20,000. The Court found substantial evidence against the petitioner, including audio recordings which pointed towards the demand and acceptance of the bribe. The judgment emphasized that such economic offences, which undermine the integrity of public services, warrant a stringent approach.

Justice Chitkara cited several Supreme Court precedents to stress the importance of custodial interrogation in cases involving corruption and economic offences. He remarked, "Custodial interrogation is qualitatively more elicitation-oriented than questioning a suspect who is well ensconced with a favourable order under Section 438 of the Code."

The decision also addressed the petitioner's argument regarding the delay in filing the complaint. The Court held that the delay was not fatal to the case, given the nature of the offence and the evidence at hand.

Date of Decision: 12th January 2024

ASI Kulwant Singh VS State of  Punjab 

 

Latest Legal News