Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Gauhati High Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Horrific Child Sexual Assault Case, Orders Strict Witness Protection

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


On 21 July 2023, Gauhati High Court, acting on its own, has cancelled the bail granted to the accused Yumken Bagra in a heinous case of sexual assault on 21 innocent children. The accused, a Hostel Warden at a Government Residential School in Karo Village, Monigong, Shi Yomi District, Arunachal Pradesh, is alleged to have committed the grave offences between 2019 to 2022, affecting 15 girls and 6 boys aged 6 to 12 years.

The court took cognizance of the matter after being “shocked” by news articles published in “Purvanchal Prahari” and “The Arunachal Times,” which reported on the granting of bail to the accused. The Court registered a suo moto cancellation of bail application, signaling its concern for the safety of the young victims.

A thorough examination of the case records revealed the gravity of the accusations. The children, who were under the age of 15 when the alleged acts occurred, were subjected to repeated sexual assaults by the accused, who was entrusted with their care as the Hostel Warden. The victims’ statements and medical reports corroborated the horrifying incidents.

The Court, in its judgment, expressed its dismay over the casual manner in which the Special Court granted bail to the accused, despite substantial objections raised by the Special Public Prosecutor. The prosecution had highlighted the risk of witness tampering and evidence tampering as valid reasons to deny bail. Nevertheless, the accused was released on bail, much to the Court’s concern.

“The conscience of the Court has been shaken by the way in which a case of such grave magnitude and sensitive nature has been dealt with in an absolutely cavalier fashion by granting bail to the main accused without assigning any plausible reasons,” the Chief Justice remarked in the judgment.

Recognizing the urgency of the matter, the Court ordered the issuance of notice of bail cancellation proceedings to the accused Yumken Bagra, son of Late Niyum Bagra, and directed the Advocate General of Arunachal Pradesh to ensure service upon the accused through the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned Police Station.

Additionally, the Court emphasized the need for strict implementation of the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018, to safeguard the victims and their families from any potential harm. It directed the Director General of Police, Arunachal Pradesh, to put in place full security measures for all the victims and their families. 

The Court also underscored the importance of sensitizing Special Judges handling cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). It mandated that the Judicial Academy, Assam, initiate immediate training and sensitization for all Judicial Officers dealing with POCSO Act cases in the States of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram, and Arunachal Pradesh.

The case is now set to be listed for further hearing on 27th July 2023.                                                

D.D-21th July 2023.  

X X X      VERSUS   IN RE- STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH

Latest Legal News