Gratuity Is a Property Right, Not a Charity: MP High Court Upholds Gratuity Claims of Long-Term Contract Workers Seized Vehicles Must Not Be Left to Rot in Open Yards: Madras High Court Invokes Article 21, Orders Release of Vehicle Seized in Illegal Quarrying Case Even After Talaq And A Settlement, A Divorced Muslim Woman Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CRPC: Kerala High Court Bail Cannot Be Withheld as Punishment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail to Govt Official in ₹200 Cr. Scholarship Scam Citing Delay and Article 21 Violation Custodial Interrogation Necessary in Serious Economic Offences: Delhi High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹1.91 Cr Housing Scam Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Not Every Middleman Is a Trafficker: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail in International Cyber Trafficking Case, Cites Absence of Mens Rea Stay in One Corner Freezes the Whole Map: Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Decades-Old Land Acquisition Despite 11-Year Delay in Award Parole Once Granted Cannot Be Made Illusory by Imposing Impossible Conditions: Rajasthan High Court Declares Mechanical Surety Requirement for Indigent Convicts Unconstitutional Once Acquisition Is Complete, Title Disputes Fall Outside Civil Court Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Appeal Lies Against Lok Adalat Compromise Decree Even on Grounds of Fraud: Orissa High Court Declares First Appeal Not Maintainable Sanction to Prosecute Under UAPA Cannot Be a Mechanical Act: Supreme Court Quashes Jharkhand Government’s Third-Time Sanction Without New Evidence FIRs in Corruption Cases Cannot Be Quashed on Hyper-Technical Grounds of Police Station Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores ACB Investigations Quashed by Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Completion of Ayurvedic Nursing Training Does Not Confer Right to Appointment: Supreme Court Rejects Legitimate Expectation Claim by Trainees University’s Error Can’t Cost a Student Her Future: Supreme Court Directs Manav Bharti University to Issue Withheld Degree and Marksheets Due to Clerical Mistake Disciplinary Exoneration Cannot Shield Public Servant from Criminal Trial in Corruption Cases: Supreme Court Customs Tariff Act | ‘End Use’ and ‘Common Parlance’ Tests Cannot Override Statutory Context: Supreme Court Classifies Mushroom Shelves as ‘Aluminium Structures’ Supreme Court Allows PIL Against Limited Maternity Benefits for Adoptive Mothers to Continue Under New Social Security Code Liberty Cannot Wait for Endless Trials: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Wadhawan Brothers in ₹57,000 Crore DHFL Scam Co-Sharer Has Superior Right of Pre-emption Even If Land Is Gair Mumkin Bara: Punjab & Haryana High Court Neighbours Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC Merely For Alleged Instigation: Karnataka High Court No Party Has a Right to Demand a Local Commissioner — It's Purely the Court’s Discretion: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Civil Revision

Gauhati High Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Horrific Child Sexual Assault Case, Orders Strict Witness Protection

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 21 July 2023, Gauhati High Court, acting on its own, has cancelled the bail granted to the accused Yumken Bagra in a heinous case of sexual assault on 21 innocent children. The accused, a Hostel Warden at a Government Residential School in Karo Village, Monigong, Shi Yomi District, Arunachal Pradesh, is alleged to have committed the grave offences between 2019 to 2022, affecting 15 girls and 6 boys aged 6 to 12 years.

The court took cognizance of the matter after being “shocked” by news articles published in “Purvanchal Prahari” and “The Arunachal Times,” which reported on the granting of bail to the accused. The Court registered a suo moto cancellation of bail application, signaling its concern for the safety of the young victims.

A thorough examination of the case records revealed the gravity of the accusations. The children, who were under the age of 15 when the alleged acts occurred, were subjected to repeated sexual assaults by the accused, who was entrusted with their care as the Hostel Warden. The victims’ statements and medical reports corroborated the horrifying incidents.

The Court, in its judgment, expressed its dismay over the casual manner in which the Special Court granted bail to the accused, despite substantial objections raised by the Special Public Prosecutor. The prosecution had highlighted the risk of witness tampering and evidence tampering as valid reasons to deny bail. Nevertheless, the accused was released on bail, much to the Court’s concern.

“The conscience of the Court has been shaken by the way in which a case of such grave magnitude and sensitive nature has been dealt with in an absolutely cavalier fashion by granting bail to the main accused without assigning any plausible reasons,” the Chief Justice remarked in the judgment.

Recognizing the urgency of the matter, the Court ordered the issuance of notice of bail cancellation proceedings to the accused Yumken Bagra, son of Late Niyum Bagra, and directed the Advocate General of Arunachal Pradesh to ensure service upon the accused through the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned Police Station.

Additionally, the Court emphasized the need for strict implementation of the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018, to safeguard the victims and their families from any potential harm. It directed the Director General of Police, Arunachal Pradesh, to put in place full security measures for all the victims and their families. 

The Court also underscored the importance of sensitizing Special Judges handling cases under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). It mandated that the Judicial Academy, Assam, initiate immediate training and sensitization for all Judicial Officers dealing with POCSO Act cases in the States of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram, and Arunachal Pradesh.

The case is now set to be listed for further hearing on 27th July 2023.                                                

D.D-21th July 2023.  

X X X      VERSUS   IN RE- STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH

Latest Legal News