Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Foetus is not suffering from lethal anomaly – Termination of Pregnancy Refused – Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a significant ruling , the High Court of Kerala, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran, reaffirmed the crucial balance between medical ethics and legal mandates in cases of pregnancy termination. The court dismissed a writ petition seeking the termination of a 30-week pregnancy due to suspected foetal abnormalities.

“This Court is left without any other option, but to close this writ petition without any further orders,” Justice Ramachandran declared, emphasizing the court’s adherence to the medical opinion that the foetus, suspected of having “Bilateral Enlarged Echogenic Kidneys with micro cysts,” does not suffer from a lethal anomaly.

The petitioners, Aswathy Surendran and Ajith Gopi, represented by advocates Cibi Thomas, C.J. Solomon, and E.G. Ambily, approached the court with apprehensions based on medical reports from Sabine Hospital and Research Centre and Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre. They feared grave abnormalities for their unborn child, urging for a termination under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

The court initially directed for a medical evaluation by the District Medical Board, Government Medical College, Kochi, followed by an expert assessment at SAT Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram. The conclusive medical opinion underscored that the anomaly was not life-threatening and recommended the continuation of the pregnancy.

In his judgment, Justice Ramachandran noted, “It is evident and obvious from the afore two reports that it is the specific opinion of the experts and doctors that the foetus is not suffering from lethal anomaly.” He further highlighted the advanced gestational stage of the foetus, which is already fully formed and preparing for life outside the womb.

Date of Decision: 18th December 2023

XXX VS The State of Kerala

 

Latest Legal News