Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Foetus is not suffering from lethal anomaly – Termination of Pregnancy Refused – Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a significant ruling , the High Court of Kerala, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran, reaffirmed the crucial balance between medical ethics and legal mandates in cases of pregnancy termination. The court dismissed a writ petition seeking the termination of a 30-week pregnancy due to suspected foetal abnormalities.

“This Court is left without any other option, but to close this writ petition without any further orders,” Justice Ramachandran declared, emphasizing the court’s adherence to the medical opinion that the foetus, suspected of having “Bilateral Enlarged Echogenic Kidneys with micro cysts,” does not suffer from a lethal anomaly.

The petitioners, Aswathy Surendran and Ajith Gopi, represented by advocates Cibi Thomas, C.J. Solomon, and E.G. Ambily, approached the court with apprehensions based on medical reports from Sabine Hospital and Research Centre and Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre. They feared grave abnormalities for their unborn child, urging for a termination under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

The court initially directed for a medical evaluation by the District Medical Board, Government Medical College, Kochi, followed by an expert assessment at SAT Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram. The conclusive medical opinion underscored that the anomaly was not life-threatening and recommended the continuation of the pregnancy.

In his judgment, Justice Ramachandran noted, “It is evident and obvious from the afore two reports that it is the specific opinion of the experts and doctors that the foetus is not suffering from lethal anomaly.” He further highlighted the advanced gestational stage of the foetus, which is already fully formed and preparing for life outside the womb.

Date of Decision: 18th December 2023

XXX VS The State of Kerala

 

Latest Legal News