Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

Foetus is not suffering from lethal anomaly – Termination of Pregnancy Refused – Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a significant ruling , the High Court of Kerala, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran, reaffirmed the crucial balance between medical ethics and legal mandates in cases of pregnancy termination. The court dismissed a writ petition seeking the termination of a 30-week pregnancy due to suspected foetal abnormalities.

“This Court is left without any other option, but to close this writ petition without any further orders,” Justice Ramachandran declared, emphasizing the court’s adherence to the medical opinion that the foetus, suspected of having “Bilateral Enlarged Echogenic Kidneys with micro cysts,” does not suffer from a lethal anomaly.

The petitioners, Aswathy Surendran and Ajith Gopi, represented by advocates Cibi Thomas, C.J. Solomon, and E.G. Ambily, approached the court with apprehensions based on medical reports from Sabine Hospital and Research Centre and Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre. They feared grave abnormalities for their unborn child, urging for a termination under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

The court initially directed for a medical evaluation by the District Medical Board, Government Medical College, Kochi, followed by an expert assessment at SAT Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram. The conclusive medical opinion underscored that the anomaly was not life-threatening and recommended the continuation of the pregnancy.

In his judgment, Justice Ramachandran noted, “It is evident and obvious from the afore two reports that it is the specific opinion of the experts and doctors that the foetus is not suffering from lethal anomaly.” He further highlighted the advanced gestational stage of the foetus, which is already fully formed and preparing for life outside the womb.

Date of Decision: 18th December 2023

XXX VS The State of Kerala

 

Latest Legal News