UDCPR | Municipal Authorities Empowered To Grant Relaxation For Recreational Open Spaces In Redevelopment Projects: Bombay High Court Appellate Court Can Enhance Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act Even Without Cross-Appeal By Claimants: Allahabad High Court State Instrumentalities Cannot Supplement Reasons For Withholding Public Money Via Affidavits Years Later: Calcutta High Court Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act | Victim's Status As 'Illegal Immigrant' Does Not Dilute Offence Or Shield Perpetrator: Bombay High Court Clubbing Of Criminal Trials | No Basis To Direct Consolidation If Connected Proceedings Have Already Concluded: Delhi High Court IBC ‘Clean Slate’ Principle Cannot Extinguish Pre-existing Crystallized Liability Under Labour Awards: Bombay High Court Section 406 IPC | 'Donation' Does Not Constitute 'Entrustment'; Criminal Prosecution Quashed In Absence Of Aggrieved Victim: Delhi High Court Failure To Deliver Possession Of Plot Constitutes "Continuous Wrong" Giving Rise To Recurrent Cause Of Action Under Consumer Protection Act: Delhi State Commission High Court Cannot Entertain Writ Petition Under Article 226 When Statutory Appellate Remedy Under Section 107 CGST Act Is Available: Gujarat High Court Appointment Of Temple Servants Is The Exclusive Prerogative Of The Hereditary Trustee: Kerala High Court Stay Of Suit Proceedings Under CPC Does Not Automatically Bar Adjudication Of Pending Temporary Injunction Application: Rajasthan High Court Section 136A MV Act | Supreme Court Directs States To Impound Vehicles With Unpaid E-Challans And Mandates Electronic Enforcement Compliance Section 115 CPC | Executing Court Cannot Dismiss Execution Petition On Hyper-Technical Grounds Regarding LRs Of Judgment Debtor: Himachal Pradesh High Court Succession Act | Will Not Validly Executed If Attesting Witness Admits Signing Without Witnessing Testator’s Signature: Madras High Court High Court Cannot Interfere Under Article 227 To Correct Errors Of Fact Or Act As An Appellate Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Act 1961 | Bar Council Has No Power To Suspend Advocate Pending Disciplinary Enquiry: Allahabad High Court Identification Of Accused By Police Personnel In Pitch Darkness Without Prior Acquaintance Is Unreliable: Himachal Pradesh High Court Body Shaming Or Insulting Physical Appearance Does Not Per Se Constitute Offence Under Section 509 IPC: Karnataka High Court Drishyam 3 | Interim Injunction To Restrain Film Release Cannot Be Granted Without Establishing Clear Subsisting Legal Right: Madras High Court Town Planning Scheme | Statutory Notice To Occupiers Under Rule 12(2)(a) Punjab Municipal Rules Is Mandatory And Independent Of Notice To Owner: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Foetus is not suffering from lethal anomaly – Termination of Pregnancy Refused – Kerala High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a significant ruling , the High Court of Kerala, presided over by the Honorable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran, reaffirmed the crucial balance between medical ethics and legal mandates in cases of pregnancy termination. The court dismissed a writ petition seeking the termination of a 30-week pregnancy due to suspected foetal abnormalities.

“This Court is left without any other option, but to close this writ petition without any further orders,” Justice Ramachandran declared, emphasizing the court’s adherence to the medical opinion that the foetus, suspected of having “Bilateral Enlarged Echogenic Kidneys with micro cysts,” does not suffer from a lethal anomaly.

The petitioners, Aswathy Surendran and Ajith Gopi, represented by advocates Cibi Thomas, C.J. Solomon, and E.G. Ambily, approached the court with apprehensions based on medical reports from Sabine Hospital and Research Centre and Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre. They feared grave abnormalities for their unborn child, urging for a termination under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

The court initially directed for a medical evaluation by the District Medical Board, Government Medical College, Kochi, followed by an expert assessment at SAT Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram. The conclusive medical opinion underscored that the anomaly was not life-threatening and recommended the continuation of the pregnancy.

In his judgment, Justice Ramachandran noted, “It is evident and obvious from the afore two reports that it is the specific opinion of the experts and doctors that the foetus is not suffering from lethal anomaly.” He further highlighted the advanced gestational stage of the foetus, which is already fully formed and preparing for life outside the womb.

Date of Decision: 18th December 2023

XXX VS The State of Kerala

 

Latest Legal News