Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

EVICTION ORDERS QUASHED DUE TO INVALID DEMARCATION REPORT – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement , the Punjab and Haryana High Court, comprising Justices Sureshwar Thakur and Kuldeep Tiwari, delivered a verdict in CWP No. 15051 of 2015, quashing eviction orders issued against the petitioners. The court found that the eviction orders, based on a demarcation report, were untenable due to various irregularities.

The case revolved around the alleged encroachment by the petitioners on a gair mumkin rasta (pathway) in khasra No. 145, owned by the Gram Panchayat. The eviction orders were issued by the Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Rewari, and the Collector, Rewari, relying on the demarcation report prepared by a revenue officer.

However, the court noted that the demarcation report had several flaws and was not valid. The petitioners had raised objections, highlighting violations of guidelines, an ex parte demarcation process, and the failure to establish fixed points from the map onto the ground. The demarcating officer's failure to serve certain respondents and obtain necessary signatures further weakened the credibility of the report.

Upon careful examination, the court determined that the reliance placed on the infirm demarcation report by the authorities was inappropriate. Consequently, the court set aside the eviction orders and remanded the case to the Assistant Collector. The court directed the Assistant Collector to obtain a fresh and valid demarcation report, ensuring compliance with all relevant rules and instructions. The report would be tendered as evidence, and affected parties would have an opportunity to cross-examine the demarcating officer.

The court emphasized the importance of justice and set a timeframe of six months for the Assistant Collector to decide the case upon receiving the new demarcation report. This ruling aims to ensure a fair resolution for all concerned parties.

Legal experts and observers anticipate that this judgment will have a significant impact on similar cases involving demarcation reports and eviction orders, emphasizing the need for proper adherence to guidelines and due process.

Decided on: 26.05.2023

Savita and others vs Deputy Commissioner, Rewari and others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Savita-Vs-DC-26-May-23-P^0H-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News