Delay in Test Identification & Absence of Motive Fatal to Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man for Murder Tokre Koli or Dhor Koli – Both Stand on Same Legal Footing: Bombay High Court Slams Scrutiny Committee for Disregarding Pre-Constitutional Records Consent Is No Defence When Victim Is Under 16: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Granting Pre-Arrest Bail in Minor Rape Cases Would Send a Harmful Societal Signal: Delhi High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail to Accused Citing POCSO’s Rigorous Standards Void Marriage No Shield Against Cruelty Charges: Karnataka High Court Affirms Section 498A Applies Even In Deceptive and Void Marital Relationships Consolidation Authorities Cannot Confer Ownership Or Alter Scheme Post Confirmation Without Due Process: Punjab & Haryana High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Jurisdiction Over Void Post-Scheme Orders Litigation Policy is Not Law, Can’t Enforce Guidelines Through Courts: Rajasthan High Court Refuses to Entertain Quo Warranto Against Additional Advocate General’s Appointment Police and Lawyers Are Two Limbs of Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Police Misconduct Incident Sole Testimony, Forensic Gaps, and Withheld Witness: No Conviction Possible: Delhi High Court Affirms Acquittal in Murder Trial Remand Keeps the Dispute Alive – Not Arrears: Bombay High Court Holds SVLDRS Relief Must Be Computed Under Litigation Category Use of ‘Absconding’ in Employment Context Not Defamatory Per Se, But A Privileged Communication Under Exception 7 of Section 499 IPC: Allahabad High Court Daughter’s Right Extinguished When Partition Effected Prior to 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Trial Courts Cannot Direct Filing of Challan After Conviction — Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Directions Against DSP Veer Singh Rule 4 Creates Parity, Not a Parallel Pension Pipeline: Rajasthan High Court Denies Dual Pension to Ex-Chief Justice Serving as SHRC Chairperson Right to Be Heard Must Be Preserved Where Claim Has a Legal Basis: Orissa High Court Upholds Impleadment of Will Beneficiary in Partition Suit Long-Term Ad Hocism Is Exploitation, Not Employment: Orissa High Court Orders Regularization Of Junior Typist After 25 Years Of Service PIL Cannot Be a Tool for Personal Grievances: Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Body’s Power to Revise Property Tax After 16 Years Omission of Accused’s Name by Eyewitness in FIR is a Fatal Lacuna: Supreme Court Acquits Man Convicted of Murder Correction In Revenue Map Under Section 30 Isn’t A Tool To Shift Plot Location After 17 Years: Supreme Court Quashes High Court’s Remand Casteist Abuses Must Be In Public View: Supreme Court Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Where Alleged Insults Occurred Inside Complainant’s House Resignation Bars Pension, But Not Gratuity: Supreme Court Draws Sharp Line Between Voluntary Retirement and Resignation in DTC Employee Case Patta Without SDM’s Prior Approval Is Void Ab Initio And Cannot Be Cancelled – It Never Legally Existed: Allahabad High Court Natural Guardian Means Legal Guardian: Custody Cannot Be Denied to Father Without Strong Reason: Orissa High Court Slams Family Court for Technical Rejection Affidavit Is Not a Caste Certificate: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Zila Panchayat Member's Election for Failing Eligibility Under OBC Quota Confession Recorded By DCP Is Legally Valid Under KCOCA – Bengaluru DCP Holds Rank Equivalent To SP: Karnataka High Court Difference of Opinion Cannot End in Death: Jharkhand High Court Commutes Death Sentence in Maoist Ambush Killing SP Pakur and Five Policemen Mere Presence Of Beneficiary During Execution Does Not Cast Suspicion On Will: Delhi High Court Litigants Have No Right to Choose the Bench: Bombay High Court Rules Rule 3A Is Mandatory, Sends Writ to Kolhapur Testimony Must Be of Sterling Quality: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Grandfather in Rape Case, Citing Unnatural Conduct and Infirm Evidence Cheating and Forgery Taint Even Legal Funds: No Safe Haven in Law for Laundered Money: Bombay High Court Final Maintenance Is Not Bound by Interim Orders – Section 125 Determination Must Be Based on Real Evidence: Delhi High Court

EVICTION ORDERS QUASHED DUE TO INVALID DEMARCATION REPORT – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement , the Punjab and Haryana High Court, comprising Justices Sureshwar Thakur and Kuldeep Tiwari, delivered a verdict in CWP No. 15051 of 2015, quashing eviction orders issued against the petitioners. The court found that the eviction orders, based on a demarcation report, were untenable due to various irregularities.

The case revolved around the alleged encroachment by the petitioners on a gair mumkin rasta (pathway) in khasra No. 145, owned by the Gram Panchayat. The eviction orders were issued by the Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Rewari, and the Collector, Rewari, relying on the demarcation report prepared by a revenue officer.

However, the court noted that the demarcation report had several flaws and was not valid. The petitioners had raised objections, highlighting violations of guidelines, an ex parte demarcation process, and the failure to establish fixed points from the map onto the ground. The demarcating officer's failure to serve certain respondents and obtain necessary signatures further weakened the credibility of the report.

Upon careful examination, the court determined that the reliance placed on the infirm demarcation report by the authorities was inappropriate. Consequently, the court set aside the eviction orders and remanded the case to the Assistant Collector. The court directed the Assistant Collector to obtain a fresh and valid demarcation report, ensuring compliance with all relevant rules and instructions. The report would be tendered as evidence, and affected parties would have an opportunity to cross-examine the demarcating officer.

The court emphasized the importance of justice and set a timeframe of six months for the Assistant Collector to decide the case upon receiving the new demarcation report. This ruling aims to ensure a fair resolution for all concerned parties.

Legal experts and observers anticipate that this judgment will have a significant impact on similar cases involving demarcation reports and eviction orders, emphasizing the need for proper adherence to guidelines and due process.

Decided on: 26.05.2023

Savita and others vs Deputy Commissioner, Rewari and others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Savita-Vs-DC-26-May-23-P^0H-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News