Accused Not Entitled To Copies Of 'Unrelied' Upon Documents At The Stage Of Framing Of Charges Under Section 91 CrPC: Supreme Court Elected Representatives Have No Privilege To Resort To Violence; Criminal Antecedents Are Material For Bail Adjudication: Supreme Court Mere Absence Of Transport Documents Does Not Create A Presumption Of Violation Of Chhattisgarh Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act, 2004: Supreme Court Section 396 IPC | Conviction For 'Dacoity With Murder' Requires Proof That Murder Was Committed In The Course Of Dacoity: Allahabad High Court 'Developers Cannot Delay Conveyance For Eternity And Milk Additional FSI Benefits': Bombay High Court Upholds Societies' Deemed Conveyance Pre-Approval Statutory Dues Stand Extinguished Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan; GST Authorities Cannot Initiate Fresh Proceedings: Calcutta High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell With Delivery Of Possession Is Admissible In A Suit For Specific Performance: Delhi High Court Stigmatic Order Discharging Probationer Without Inquiry Is Void For Violation Of Natural Justice: Gujarat High Court Execution Proceedings | Court Cannot Impose Arbitrary Financial Conditions Without Reason In Stay Applications: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 528 BNSS | High Court Cannot Exercise Inherent Powers To Circumvent Statutory Bar Against Second Revision: Delhi High Court Advocate Empanelment | Restriction On Multiple Applications Is A Procedural Choice Within Employer’s Domain: Delhi High Court Acquittal Appeal | Double Presumption Of Innocence In Favour Of Accused Cannot Be Disturbed Merely Because Another View Is Possible: Gujarat High Court SC/ST Act | Offence Under Section 3(1)(g) Not Attracted If Dispossession Or Interference Is Not Due To Victim's Caste: Himachal Pradesh High Court Judicial Officer Must Maintain Distance From Practicing Advocates To Avoid Impropriety: Gujarat High Court Upholds Dismissal Section 183 BNSS | Investigating Officer Cannot Independently Record Further Statement Of Victim After Recording Before Magistrate: Karnataka High Court Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court

EVICTION ORDERS QUASHED DUE TO INVALID DEMARCATION REPORT – P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement , the Punjab and Haryana High Court, comprising Justices Sureshwar Thakur and Kuldeep Tiwari, delivered a verdict in CWP No. 15051 of 2015, quashing eviction orders issued against the petitioners. The court found that the eviction orders, based on a demarcation report, were untenable due to various irregularities.

The case revolved around the alleged encroachment by the petitioners on a gair mumkin rasta (pathway) in khasra No. 145, owned by the Gram Panchayat. The eviction orders were issued by the Assistant Collector Ist Grade, Rewari, and the Collector, Rewari, relying on the demarcation report prepared by a revenue officer.

However, the court noted that the demarcation report had several flaws and was not valid. The petitioners had raised objections, highlighting violations of guidelines, an ex parte demarcation process, and the failure to establish fixed points from the map onto the ground. The demarcating officer's failure to serve certain respondents and obtain necessary signatures further weakened the credibility of the report.

Upon careful examination, the court determined that the reliance placed on the infirm demarcation report by the authorities was inappropriate. Consequently, the court set aside the eviction orders and remanded the case to the Assistant Collector. The court directed the Assistant Collector to obtain a fresh and valid demarcation report, ensuring compliance with all relevant rules and instructions. The report would be tendered as evidence, and affected parties would have an opportunity to cross-examine the demarcating officer.

The court emphasized the importance of justice and set a timeframe of six months for the Assistant Collector to decide the case upon receiving the new demarcation report. This ruling aims to ensure a fair resolution for all concerned parties.

Legal experts and observers anticipate that this judgment will have a significant impact on similar cases involving demarcation reports and eviction orders, emphasizing the need for proper adherence to guidelines and due process.

Decided on: 26.05.2023

Savita and others vs Deputy Commissioner, Rewari and others

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Savita-Vs-DC-26-May-23-P^0H-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News