Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court

Employees  Not Entitled To Wages If No Work Takes Place Due To A Sit-In Strike: Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal ruling, the Karnataka High Court, presided over by The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyoti Mulimani, has quashed an Industrial Tribunal's award related to workers' wages during strikes, shedding light on crucial legal principles.

The judgment, delivered on November 29, 2023, centered around the dispute between M/S. J.K. Tyres and Industries Ltd. and the Vikrant Tyres Employees' Union. The case raised questions about the entitlement to wages for workers during a strike and the validity of an Industrial Tribunal's decision.

In a pivotal observation, the High Court clarified the legal position on payment of wages during work stoppages due to strikes, stating, "It is an established principle in Industrial law that employees are not entitled to wages if no work takes place due to a sit-in strike or slowdown of production on the part of the workmen in another part of the establishment. This is the principle of law laid down in Section 25E(iii) of the Industrial Disputes Act."

Furthermore, the court emphasized the importance of considering relevant factors and not disregarding the financial repercussions on the management. The judgment pointed out, "The Tribunal has failed to have regard to relevant considerations and disregarded relevant matters."

As a result of the High Court's decision, the Industrial Tribunal's award, which granted 50% wages during the strike period, was quashed. The issuance of a Writ of Certiorari was ordered, leading to the annulment of the Tribunal's decision.

Date of Decision: November 29, 2023

M/S. J.K.Tyres And Industries Ltd., VS General Secretary, Vikrant Tyres Employees' Union

Latest Legal News