No Arbitration Agreement, No Arbitrator: Supreme Court Voids Award Made Without Municipal Council's Consent, Calls Entire Proceedings "Coram Non Judice" Post-Disposal Miscellaneous Applications Maintainable Only In Rare Situations; Court Becomes Functus Officio After SLP Dismissal: Supreme Court Vague & Omnibus Allegations Against Relatives In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Nipped In The Bud; 7-Year Delay In FIR Fatal: Supreme Court State Can Withdraw Electricity Duty Exemption For Captive Power Plants In Public Interest But Must Give One-Year Notice Period: Supreme Court DSC Personnel Entitled To Second Pension; Shortfall In Service Up To 12 Months Can Be Condoned: Supreme Court Person Professing Christianity Cannot Claim Scheduled Caste Status To Invoke SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Except Matters One May, But Exclude Justice One Cannot: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Holds State Cannot Be Judge In Its Own Cause On Disputed Breach When State Requisitions Your Vehicle For Elections And It Kills Someone, The State Pays — Not Your Insurer: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Financial Burden Cannot Defeat Constitutional Right to Just Compensation: Supreme Court Unsigned Charge Is A Curable Irregularity, Won't Vitiate Trial Unless 'Failure Of Justice' Is Shown: Supreme Court Tenant Files Fresh Petition Before Rent Authority After Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Review And Misc Application — Court Calls It "Gross Abuse of Process", Voids Restoration Order Taxation Law | Exemption For Naphtha Depends On 'Intended Use' At Procurement, Not Actual Exclusive Use: Supreme Court Army's Own Grading System Worked Against Women Officers For Years — Supreme Court Grants Permanent Commission, Pension To Short Service Women Officers

Employees  Not Entitled To Wages If No Work Takes Place Due To A Sit-In Strike: Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal ruling, the Karnataka High Court, presided over by The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyoti Mulimani, has quashed an Industrial Tribunal's award related to workers' wages during strikes, shedding light on crucial legal principles.

The judgment, delivered on November 29, 2023, centered around the dispute between M/S. J.K. Tyres and Industries Ltd. and the Vikrant Tyres Employees' Union. The case raised questions about the entitlement to wages for workers during a strike and the validity of an Industrial Tribunal's decision.

In a pivotal observation, the High Court clarified the legal position on payment of wages during work stoppages due to strikes, stating, "It is an established principle in Industrial law that employees are not entitled to wages if no work takes place due to a sit-in strike or slowdown of production on the part of the workmen in another part of the establishment. This is the principle of law laid down in Section 25E(iii) of the Industrial Disputes Act."

Furthermore, the court emphasized the importance of considering relevant factors and not disregarding the financial repercussions on the management. The judgment pointed out, "The Tribunal has failed to have regard to relevant considerations and disregarded relevant matters."

As a result of the High Court's decision, the Industrial Tribunal's award, which granted 50% wages during the strike period, was quashed. The issuance of a Writ of Certiorari was ordered, leading to the annulment of the Tribunal's decision.

Date of Decision: November 29, 2023

M/S. J.K.Tyres And Industries Ltd., VS General Secretary, Vikrant Tyres Employees' Union

Latest Legal News