MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Employees  Not Entitled To Wages If No Work Takes Place Due To A Sit-In Strike: Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal ruling, the Karnataka High Court, presided over by The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyoti Mulimani, has quashed an Industrial Tribunal's award related to workers' wages during strikes, shedding light on crucial legal principles.

The judgment, delivered on November 29, 2023, centered around the dispute between M/S. J.K. Tyres and Industries Ltd. and the Vikrant Tyres Employees' Union. The case raised questions about the entitlement to wages for workers during a strike and the validity of an Industrial Tribunal's decision.

In a pivotal observation, the High Court clarified the legal position on payment of wages during work stoppages due to strikes, stating, "It is an established principle in Industrial law that employees are not entitled to wages if no work takes place due to a sit-in strike or slowdown of production on the part of the workmen in another part of the establishment. This is the principle of law laid down in Section 25E(iii) of the Industrial Disputes Act."

Furthermore, the court emphasized the importance of considering relevant factors and not disregarding the financial repercussions on the management. The judgment pointed out, "The Tribunal has failed to have regard to relevant considerations and disregarded relevant matters."

As a result of the High Court's decision, the Industrial Tribunal's award, which granted 50% wages during the strike period, was quashed. The issuance of a Writ of Certiorari was ordered, leading to the annulment of the Tribunal's decision.

Date of Decision: November 29, 2023

M/S. J.K.Tyres And Industries Ltd., VS General Secretary, Vikrant Tyres Employees' Union

Latest Legal News