Writ Jurisdiction Not Appropriate For Adjudicating Complex Title Disputes; Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Ownership: Madhya Pradesh High Court Joint Account Holder Not Liable Under Section 138 NI Act If Not A Signatory To Dishonoured Cheque: Allahabad High Court Private Individuals Accepting Money Can Be Prosecuted Under MPID Act; Nomenclature As 'Loan' Irrelevant: Supreme Court Nomenclature Of Transaction As 'Loan' Irrelevant; If Ingredients Met, It Is A 'Deposit' Under MPID Act: Supreme Court Pleadings Must State Material Facts, Not Evidence; Deficiency In Pleading Cannot Be Raised For First Time In Appeal: Supreme Court Denial Of Remission Cannot Rest Solely On Heinousness Of Crime; Justice Doesn't Permit Permanent Incarceration In Shadow Of Worst Act: Supreme Court Second Application For Rejection Of Plaint Barred By Res Judicata If Earlier Order Attained Finality: Supreme Court Section 6(5) Hindu Succession Act Is A Saving Clause, Not A Jurisdictional Bar To Partition Suits: Supreme Court Sale Of Natural Gas Via Common Carrier Pipelines Is An Inter-State Sale; UP Has No Jurisdiction To Levy VAT: Supreme Court Mediclaim Reimbursement Not Deductible From Motor Accident Compensation; Tortfeasor Can’t Benefit From Claimant’s Prudence: Supreme Court Rules Of Procedure Are Handmaid Of Justice, Not Mistress; Striking Off Defence Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Not Mechanical: Supreme Court Power To Strike Off Tenant's Defense Under Order XV Rule 5 CPC Is Discretionary, Not To Be Exercised Mechanically: Supreme Court Areas Urbanised Before 1959 Don't Require Separate Notification To Fall Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Delhi High Court Police Cannot Freeze Bank Accounts To Perform Compensatory Justice; Direct Nexus With Offence Essential: Bombay High Court FSL Probe Before Electronic Evidence Meets Section 65B Admissibility Standards: Gujarat High Court Court Shouldn't Adjudicate Rights At Stage Of Granting Leave Under Section 92 CPC, Only Prima Facie Case Required: Allahabad High Court Right To Seek Bail Based On Non-Furnishing Of 'Grounds Of Arrest' Applies Only Prospectively From November 6, 2025: Madras High Court Prior Exposure To Accused Before TIP Renders Identification Meaningless: Delhi High Court Acquits Four In Uphaar Cinema Murder Case No Particular Format Prescribed For 'Proposed Resolution' In No-Confidence Motion; Intention Of Members To Be Gathered From Document As A Whole: Orissa High Court Trial Court Cannot Grant Temporary Injunction Without Adverting To Allegations Of Fraud And Collusion: Calcutta High Court "Ganja" Definition Under NDPS Act Excludes Roots & Stems: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail As Seized Weight Included Whole Plants Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Doesn't Displace Section 37 NDPS Mandate In Commercial Quantity Cases: Orissa High Court

Employees  Not Entitled To Wages If No Work Takes Place Due To A Sit-In Strike: Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal ruling, the Karnataka High Court, presided over by The Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyoti Mulimani, has quashed an Industrial Tribunal's award related to workers' wages during strikes, shedding light on crucial legal principles.

The judgment, delivered on November 29, 2023, centered around the dispute between M/S. J.K. Tyres and Industries Ltd. and the Vikrant Tyres Employees' Union. The case raised questions about the entitlement to wages for workers during a strike and the validity of an Industrial Tribunal's decision.

In a pivotal observation, the High Court clarified the legal position on payment of wages during work stoppages due to strikes, stating, "It is an established principle in Industrial law that employees are not entitled to wages if no work takes place due to a sit-in strike or slowdown of production on the part of the workmen in another part of the establishment. This is the principle of law laid down in Section 25E(iii) of the Industrial Disputes Act."

Furthermore, the court emphasized the importance of considering relevant factors and not disregarding the financial repercussions on the management. The judgment pointed out, "The Tribunal has failed to have regard to relevant considerations and disregarded relevant matters."

As a result of the High Court's decision, the Industrial Tribunal's award, which granted 50% wages during the strike period, was quashed. The issuance of a Writ of Certiorari was ordered, leading to the annulment of the Tribunal's decision.

Date of Decision: November 29, 2023

M/S. J.K.Tyres And Industries Ltd., VS General Secretary, Vikrant Tyres Employees' Union

Latest Legal News