Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Eligibility Criteria For Promotion Cannot Be Ignored or Waived: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment by the High Court of Delhi, the court has underlined the significance of adhering to eligibility criteria in promotional examinations. The judgment, delivered on December 7, 2023, came in response to an application filed by a petitioner seeking permission to apply for promotion from Scale II to Scale IV within a government organization.

The court’s observation regarding the eligibility criteria for promotional exams was a key highlight of the judgment. In its ruling, the court stated, “The eligibility criteria for participating in this promotional exercise have been clearly enunciated in the notices issued. Every applicant who wishes to participate in this promotional exercise is required to cross the threshold of the eligibility criteria, since that would be the foundation of selecting as to which candidate is fit to be promoted to the next scale. These eligibility criteria cannot be ignored or waived, just for the asking.”

The petitioner had sought permission to appear in the promotional examination, despite presently holding a position in Scale II and lacking the requisite three years of continuous service in Scale III, as mandated by the eligibility criteria. Additionally, the court noted that the last date for applying for the examination had already passed, further complicating the petitioner’s request.

The court ultimately dismissed the petitioner’s application, stating that eligibility criteria must be met before a candidate can sit for an examination. The judgment underscores the importance of maintaining fairness and adherence to established rules in government promotions. It highlights the court’s commitment to safeguarding the rights and opportunities of all eligible candidates, ensuring that promotional prospects and seniority among government employees remain unaffected.

Date of Decision: December 7, 2023

SHALINI SINGH  VS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. & ORS.   

Latest Legal News