No Arbitration Agreement, No Arbitrator: Supreme Court Voids Award Made Without Municipal Council's Consent, Calls Entire Proceedings "Coram Non Judice" Post-Disposal Miscellaneous Applications Maintainable Only In Rare Situations; Court Becomes Functus Officio After SLP Dismissal: Supreme Court Vague & Omnibus Allegations Against Relatives In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Nipped In The Bud; 7-Year Delay In FIR Fatal: Supreme Court State Can Withdraw Electricity Duty Exemption For Captive Power Plants In Public Interest But Must Give One-Year Notice Period: Supreme Court DSC Personnel Entitled To Second Pension; Shortfall In Service Up To 12 Months Can Be Condoned: Supreme Court Person Professing Christianity Cannot Claim Scheduled Caste Status To Invoke SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Except Matters One May, But Exclude Justice One Cannot: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Holds State Cannot Be Judge In Its Own Cause On Disputed Breach When State Requisitions Your Vehicle For Elections And It Kills Someone, The State Pays — Not Your Insurer: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Financial Burden Cannot Defeat Constitutional Right to Just Compensation: Supreme Court Unsigned Charge Is A Curable Irregularity, Won't Vitiate Trial Unless 'Failure Of Justice' Is Shown: Supreme Court Tenant Files Fresh Petition Before Rent Authority After Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Review And Misc Application — Court Calls It "Gross Abuse of Process", Voids Restoration Order Taxation Law | Exemption For Naphtha Depends On 'Intended Use' At Procurement, Not Actual Exclusive Use: Supreme Court Army's Own Grading System Worked Against Women Officers For Years — Supreme Court Grants Permanent Commission, Pension To Short Service Women Officers

Eligibility Criteria For Promotion Cannot Be Ignored or Waived: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment by the High Court of Delhi, the court has underlined the significance of adhering to eligibility criteria in promotional examinations. The judgment, delivered on December 7, 2023, came in response to an application filed by a petitioner seeking permission to apply for promotion from Scale II to Scale IV within a government organization.

The court’s observation regarding the eligibility criteria for promotional exams was a key highlight of the judgment. In its ruling, the court stated, “The eligibility criteria for participating in this promotional exercise have been clearly enunciated in the notices issued. Every applicant who wishes to participate in this promotional exercise is required to cross the threshold of the eligibility criteria, since that would be the foundation of selecting as to which candidate is fit to be promoted to the next scale. These eligibility criteria cannot be ignored or waived, just for the asking.”

The petitioner had sought permission to appear in the promotional examination, despite presently holding a position in Scale II and lacking the requisite three years of continuous service in Scale III, as mandated by the eligibility criteria. Additionally, the court noted that the last date for applying for the examination had already passed, further complicating the petitioner’s request.

The court ultimately dismissed the petitioner’s application, stating that eligibility criteria must be met before a candidate can sit for an examination. The judgment underscores the importance of maintaining fairness and adherence to established rules in government promotions. It highlights the court’s commitment to safeguarding the rights and opportunities of all eligible candidates, ensuring that promotional prospects and seniority among government employees remain unaffected.

Date of Decision: December 7, 2023

SHALINI SINGH  VS UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. & ORS.   

Latest Legal News