Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Efficient Tax Appeal Disposal System - A Real Time and Practical Approach – Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court has disposed of a long-standing Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the All India Federation of Tax Practitioners, citing substantial measures taken by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to expedite the disposal of income tax appeals. The High Court acknowledged the CBDT's “real time and practical approach” to managing the backlog of appeals, marking a significant move towards improving the efficiency of tax litigation management.

The PIL, which sought directives for the timely disposal of appeals by Commissioners (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act and an increase in the number of such commissioners, has been under the court's consideration since 2013. Addressing the petition's concerns, the court noted the additional affidavit from the CBDT, which outlined a comprehensive roadmap for handling pending appeals. The court was satisfied that the CBDT's plan addressed the petitioner's prayers suitably.

Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, in his judgment, emphasized the importance of the judiciary's role in ensuring that administrative bodies implement policies efficiently. He remarked, "We are satisfied that the prayers as sought by the petitioner have been suitably addressed by the CBDT."

The bench, comprising the Chief Justice and Justice Gedela, observed that the introduction of 'Faceless Appeals' and the proposal to appoint additional Commissioners (Appeals) demonstrated the CBDT's commitment to reducing pendency. The court also acknowledged the Union of India's potential role in filling up vacant posts and possibly increasing the sanctioned strength to meet the objectives of the CBDT's yearly Central Action Plan.

The advocates representing the petitioner, led by Senior Advocate Mr. Prem Lata Bansal, along with Mr. Shivang Bansal and Mr. Anunav Kumar, argued the case, highlighting the delays and inefficiencies that have plagued taxpayers. Responding for the CBDT, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Senior Standing Counsel, presented the steps being taken to resolve the issue.

As the court disposed of the PIL, the judiciary has set a precedent, ensuring that the tax appeal process becomes more streamlined and taxpayer-friendly, thus, enhancing the trust in the country's tax administration and legal systems.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF TAX PRACTIONERS  VS UOI AND ANR  

Latest Legal News