Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |     Invalid Bank Guarantee Invocation Found Fatal to Recovery Claim: Delhi High Court Dismisses GAIL’s Appeal    |     Adverse Remarks in APAR Recorded Without Objectivity and Likely Motivated by Bias: Delhi High Court Quashes Biased APAR Downgrade of CRPF Officer    |    

Efficient Tax Appeal Disposal System - A Real Time and Practical Approach – Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court has disposed of a long-standing Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the All India Federation of Tax Practitioners, citing substantial measures taken by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to expedite the disposal of income tax appeals. The High Court acknowledged the CBDT's “real time and practical approach” to managing the backlog of appeals, marking a significant move towards improving the efficiency of tax litigation management.

The PIL, which sought directives for the timely disposal of appeals by Commissioners (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act and an increase in the number of such commissioners, has been under the court's consideration since 2013. Addressing the petition's concerns, the court noted the additional affidavit from the CBDT, which outlined a comprehensive roadmap for handling pending appeals. The court was satisfied that the CBDT's plan addressed the petitioner's prayers suitably.

Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, in his judgment, emphasized the importance of the judiciary's role in ensuring that administrative bodies implement policies efficiently. He remarked, "We are satisfied that the prayers as sought by the petitioner have been suitably addressed by the CBDT."

The bench, comprising the Chief Justice and Justice Gedela, observed that the introduction of 'Faceless Appeals' and the proposal to appoint additional Commissioners (Appeals) demonstrated the CBDT's commitment to reducing pendency. The court also acknowledged the Union of India's potential role in filling up vacant posts and possibly increasing the sanctioned strength to meet the objectives of the CBDT's yearly Central Action Plan.

The advocates representing the petitioner, led by Senior Advocate Mr. Prem Lata Bansal, along with Mr. Shivang Bansal and Mr. Anunav Kumar, argued the case, highlighting the delays and inefficiencies that have plagued taxpayers. Responding for the CBDT, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Senior Standing Counsel, presented the steps being taken to resolve the issue.

As the court disposed of the PIL, the judiciary has set a precedent, ensuring that the tax appeal process becomes more streamlined and taxpayer-friendly, thus, enhancing the trust in the country's tax administration and legal systems.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF TAX PRACTIONERS  VS UOI AND ANR  

Similar News