Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal GST Officer Froze Business Accounts Without Any Legal Basis, Ignored Taxpayer for Three Months: Bombay High Court Imposes Personal Costs Weapon Recovered, But No Forensic Report, No Independent Witness — Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused

Efficient Tax Appeal Disposal System - A Real Time and Practical Approach – Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court has disposed of a long-standing Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the All India Federation of Tax Practitioners, citing substantial measures taken by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to expedite the disposal of income tax appeals. The High Court acknowledged the CBDT's “real time and practical approach” to managing the backlog of appeals, marking a significant move towards improving the efficiency of tax litigation management.

The PIL, which sought directives for the timely disposal of appeals by Commissioners (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act and an increase in the number of such commissioners, has been under the court's consideration since 2013. Addressing the petition's concerns, the court noted the additional affidavit from the CBDT, which outlined a comprehensive roadmap for handling pending appeals. The court was satisfied that the CBDT's plan addressed the petitioner's prayers suitably.

Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, in his judgment, emphasized the importance of the judiciary's role in ensuring that administrative bodies implement policies efficiently. He remarked, "We are satisfied that the prayers as sought by the petitioner have been suitably addressed by the CBDT."

The bench, comprising the Chief Justice and Justice Gedela, observed that the introduction of 'Faceless Appeals' and the proposal to appoint additional Commissioners (Appeals) demonstrated the CBDT's commitment to reducing pendency. The court also acknowledged the Union of India's potential role in filling up vacant posts and possibly increasing the sanctioned strength to meet the objectives of the CBDT's yearly Central Action Plan.

The advocates representing the petitioner, led by Senior Advocate Mr. Prem Lata Bansal, along with Mr. Shivang Bansal and Mr. Anunav Kumar, argued the case, highlighting the delays and inefficiencies that have plagued taxpayers. Responding for the CBDT, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Senior Standing Counsel, presented the steps being taken to resolve the issue.

As the court disposed of the PIL, the judiciary has set a precedent, ensuring that the tax appeal process becomes more streamlined and taxpayer-friendly, thus, enhancing the trust in the country's tax administration and legal systems.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF TAX PRACTIONERS  VS UOI AND ANR  

Latest Legal News