MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Efficient Tax Appeal Disposal System - A Real Time and Practical Approach – Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court has disposed of a long-standing Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the All India Federation of Tax Practitioners, citing substantial measures taken by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) to expedite the disposal of income tax appeals. The High Court acknowledged the CBDT's “real time and practical approach” to managing the backlog of appeals, marking a significant move towards improving the efficiency of tax litigation management.

The PIL, which sought directives for the timely disposal of appeals by Commissioners (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act and an increase in the number of such commissioners, has been under the court's consideration since 2013. Addressing the petition's concerns, the court noted the additional affidavit from the CBDT, which outlined a comprehensive roadmap for handling pending appeals. The court was satisfied that the CBDT's plan addressed the petitioner's prayers suitably.

Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, in his judgment, emphasized the importance of the judiciary's role in ensuring that administrative bodies implement policies efficiently. He remarked, "We are satisfied that the prayers as sought by the petitioner have been suitably addressed by the CBDT."

The bench, comprising the Chief Justice and Justice Gedela, observed that the introduction of 'Faceless Appeals' and the proposal to appoint additional Commissioners (Appeals) demonstrated the CBDT's commitment to reducing pendency. The court also acknowledged the Union of India's potential role in filling up vacant posts and possibly increasing the sanctioned strength to meet the objectives of the CBDT's yearly Central Action Plan.

The advocates representing the petitioner, led by Senior Advocate Mr. Prem Lata Bansal, along with Mr. Shivang Bansal and Mr. Anunav Kumar, argued the case, highlighting the delays and inefficiencies that have plagued taxpayers. Responding for the CBDT, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Senior Standing Counsel, presented the steps being taken to resolve the issue.

As the court disposed of the PIL, the judiciary has set a precedent, ensuring that the tax appeal process becomes more streamlined and taxpayer-friendly, thus, enhancing the trust in the country's tax administration and legal systems.

Date of Decision: 06.11.2023

ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF TAX PRACTIONERS  VS UOI AND ANR  

Latest Legal News