Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court

DELIBERATE INSULTS TO RELIGION NOT PROTECTED, CHARGE SHEET TO STAND – ALLH. HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court delivered a judgment regarding a social media case involving the alleged outraging of religious sentiments. The court dismissed an application seeking to quash the charge sheet and emphasized the importance of responsible online speech.

The case revolved around an objectionable message posted on WhatsApp regarding "Maa Durga," which had led to hurt sentiments among the Hindu community. The complainant had filed an FIR, resulting in a charge sheet being filed against the applicant under Sections 295A IPC and Section 67 of the I.T. Act, 2008.

During the proceedings, the applicant claimed innocence and asserted that they had received the message but did not send or forward it. However, the court took note of the evidence, including WhatsApp chats, indicating the applicant's admission of receiving and forwarding the message to other groups.

The court highlighted that Section 295A IPC penalizes deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings. It emphasized that not all acts would qualify as an offense and that unintentional or careless insults were not covered. The judgment stressed that freedom of expression on social media comes with responsibilities and does not grant unfettered license for language use.

The ruling recognized social media as a global platform for exchanging thoughts and opinions but emphasized the need for responsible speech. The court underlined that citizens do not have the right to speak without responsibility and that freedom of expression should be exercised while considering its special responsibilities and duties.

The court further noted that the charge sheet was supported by cogent and reliable evidence, as collected during the investigation. Considering the prima facie case made against the applicant, the court affirmed the decision to summon the applicant for trial.

Date :- 16.5.2023

Dr.Shiv Sidharth @ Shiv Kumar Bharti vs State Of U.P And Another     

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/16-May-2023-Dr-Shiv-Vs-State-Allh-HC.pdf"]                                   

Latest Legal News