No Arbitration Agreement, No Arbitrator: Supreme Court Voids Award Made Without Municipal Council's Consent, Calls Entire Proceedings "Coram Non Judice" Post-Disposal Miscellaneous Applications Maintainable Only In Rare Situations; Court Becomes Functus Officio After SLP Dismissal: Supreme Court Vague & Omnibus Allegations Against Relatives In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Nipped In The Bud; 7-Year Delay In FIR Fatal: Supreme Court State Can Withdraw Electricity Duty Exemption For Captive Power Plants In Public Interest But Must Give One-Year Notice Period: Supreme Court DSC Personnel Entitled To Second Pension; Shortfall In Service Up To 12 Months Can Be Condoned: Supreme Court Person Professing Christianity Cannot Claim Scheduled Caste Status To Invoke SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Except Matters One May, But Exclude Justice One Cannot: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Holds State Cannot Be Judge In Its Own Cause On Disputed Breach When State Requisitions Your Vehicle For Elections And It Kills Someone, The State Pays — Not Your Insurer: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Financial Burden Cannot Defeat Constitutional Right to Just Compensation: Supreme Court Unsigned Charge Is A Curable Irregularity, Won't Vitiate Trial Unless 'Failure Of Justice' Is Shown: Supreme Court Tenant Files Fresh Petition Before Rent Authority After Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Review And Misc Application — Court Calls It "Gross Abuse of Process", Voids Restoration Order Taxation Law | Exemption For Naphtha Depends On 'Intended Use' At Procurement, Not Actual Exclusive Use: Supreme Court Army's Own Grading System Worked Against Women Officers For Years — Supreme Court Grants Permanent Commission, Pension To Short Service Women Officers

Delhi High Court Upholds Tribunal’s Order on Promotion: “The Right to be Considered for Promotion is Fundamental,” Affirms Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the fundamental right to fair consideration for promotion, the Delhi High Court today upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal’s decision mandating a retrospective review of the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for respondent No.4, an employee within the Military Engineering Services.

The bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, delivered the judgment in the case of W.P.(C) 4017/2023. The Court’s decision centered on the principle that “the right to be considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee is a fundamental right guaranteed under Article 16 of the Constitution of India,” highlighting the importance of equitable and fair promotion processes in employment.

The case revolved around the eligibility criteria for promotion from the post of Assistant Surveyor of Works (ASW) to Surveyor of Works (SW) within the Military Engineering Services. A key point of contention was the equivalence of a Civil Engineering degree with the final examination of the Institution of Surveyors (India), a matter previously settled by the Supreme Court.

The petitioners, B.N. Singh and another employee, challenged the Tribunal’s order on the grounds that it affected their seniority and was made without their inclusion in the original application. The High Court, however, dismissed the petition, emphasizing the Tribunal’s rightful direction for a review DPC in light of the Supreme Court’s decision on qualification equivalence.

The Court also noted the significant delay in the consideration of respondent No.4 for promotion, despite the Supreme Court’s clarification on the equivalence of qualifications. This delay was deemed unjust, leading to the decision to uphold the Tribunal’s order for a retrospective review.

Date of Decision: November 20, 2023

B.N. SINGH AND ANR. VS  UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Latest Legal News