Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Delhi High Court Upholds Tribunal’s Order on Promotion: “The Right to be Considered for Promotion is Fundamental,” Affirms Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the fundamental right to fair consideration for promotion, the Delhi High Court today upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal’s decision mandating a retrospective review of the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for respondent No.4, an employee within the Military Engineering Services.

The bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, delivered the judgment in the case of W.P.(C) 4017/2023. The Court’s decision centered on the principle that “the right to be considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee is a fundamental right guaranteed under Article 16 of the Constitution of India,” highlighting the importance of equitable and fair promotion processes in employment.

The case revolved around the eligibility criteria for promotion from the post of Assistant Surveyor of Works (ASW) to Surveyor of Works (SW) within the Military Engineering Services. A key point of contention was the equivalence of a Civil Engineering degree with the final examination of the Institution of Surveyors (India), a matter previously settled by the Supreme Court.

The petitioners, B.N. Singh and another employee, challenged the Tribunal’s order on the grounds that it affected their seniority and was made without their inclusion in the original application. The High Court, however, dismissed the petition, emphasizing the Tribunal’s rightful direction for a review DPC in light of the Supreme Court’s decision on qualification equivalence.

The Court also noted the significant delay in the consideration of respondent No.4 for promotion, despite the Supreme Court’s clarification on the equivalence of qualifications. This delay was deemed unjust, leading to the decision to uphold the Tribunal’s order for a retrospective review.

Date of Decision: November 20, 2023

B.N. SINGH AND ANR. VS  UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Latest Legal News