Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

Delhi High Court Upholds Tribunal’s Order on Promotion: “The Right to be Considered for Promotion is Fundamental,” Affirms Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling that underscores the fundamental right to fair consideration for promotion, the Delhi High Court today upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal’s decision mandating a retrospective review of the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) for respondent No.4, an employee within the Military Engineering Services.

The bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, delivered the judgment in the case of W.P.(C) 4017/2023. The Court’s decision centered on the principle that “the right to be considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee is a fundamental right guaranteed under Article 16 of the Constitution of India,” highlighting the importance of equitable and fair promotion processes in employment.

The case revolved around the eligibility criteria for promotion from the post of Assistant Surveyor of Works (ASW) to Surveyor of Works (SW) within the Military Engineering Services. A key point of contention was the equivalence of a Civil Engineering degree with the final examination of the Institution of Surveyors (India), a matter previously settled by the Supreme Court.

The petitioners, B.N. Singh and another employee, challenged the Tribunal’s order on the grounds that it affected their seniority and was made without their inclusion in the original application. The High Court, however, dismissed the petition, emphasizing the Tribunal’s rightful direction for a review DPC in light of the Supreme Court’s decision on qualification equivalence.

The Court also noted the significant delay in the consideration of respondent No.4 for promotion, despite the Supreme Court’s clarification on the equivalence of qualifications. This delay was deemed unjust, leading to the decision to uphold the Tribunal’s order for a retrospective review.

Date of Decision: November 20, 2023

B.N. SINGH AND ANR. VS  UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Latest Legal News