Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Delhi High Court Addresses Urgent Need for Regulation of Drug and Alcohol De-addiction Centers in a PIL

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


“It is crucial that the Government continue its efforts and remain steadfast in the endeavor to combat substance abuse.” Delhi High Court.

In a significant development, the High Court of Delhi has addressed the pressing issue of unregulated drug and alcohol de-addiction centers in India. The court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought crucial reliefs to tackle the rampant problem of substance abuse and addiction. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Chief Justice and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, recognized the importance of regulation and monitoring of these centers to protect public health and combat the erosion of the social fabric.

Highlighting the urgency of the matter, the court stated in its judgment, “Government of India tackles this problem through ‘supply reduction’ and ‘demand reduction’... It is crucial that the Government continue its efforts and remain steadfast in the endeavor to combat substance abuse.” The court also acknowledged the petitioner’s significant contribution in bringing the issue to light and appreciated their unwavering efforts.

The PIL raised concerns about the lack of regulation and oversight of private rehabilitation centers, while acknowledging the existing frameworks for government-run centers. The court noted the report of the amicus curiae, who emphasized the need for evidence-based medical practices and consensual treatment for addiction, along with the regulation of private rehabilitation centers.

The court further highlighted the initiatives undertaken by the Government of India, including the comprehensive survey on substance use, the National Action Plan for Drug Demand Reduction (NAPDDR), and the Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan (NMBA) aimed at counseling, treatment, capacity building, and awareness programs. These efforts reflect the government’s commitment to combating substance abuse and addiction.

Recognizing the progress made by the government, the court expressed satisfaction with the steps taken to address the issues raised in the PIL. However, it emphasized the need for sustained attention and a multifaceted approach, stating, “By doing so, the Government can contribute to the overall betterment of society and protect public health.”

With many of the reliefs sought in the petition already addressed by the government’s actions, the court disposed of the PIL. While the petitioner had unfortunately passed away before the final hearing, the court acknowledged their significant contribution in bringing attention to the critical issue of substance abuse and rehabilitation.

This judgment serves as a clarion call for the government to continue its efforts and ensure the effective regulation and management of drug and alcohol de-addiction centers across the country. By doing so, it aims to create a healthier and more informed society, free from the clutches of substance abuse.

Date of Decision: 20th July, 2023

RAJIV BOOLCHAND JAIN vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS    

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Rajiv-BOOLCHAND-Vs-State-20-July-23.pdf"]

Latest Legal News