Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Delhi High Court Addresses Urgent Need for Regulation of Drug and Alcohol De-addiction Centers in a PIL

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


“It is crucial that the Government continue its efforts and remain steadfast in the endeavor to combat substance abuse.” Delhi High Court.

In a significant development, the High Court of Delhi has addressed the pressing issue of unregulated drug and alcohol de-addiction centers in India. The court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought crucial reliefs to tackle the rampant problem of substance abuse and addiction. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Chief Justice and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, recognized the importance of regulation and monitoring of these centers to protect public health and combat the erosion of the social fabric.

Highlighting the urgency of the matter, the court stated in its judgment, Government of India tackles this problem through ‘supply reduction’ and ‘demand reduction’... It is crucial that the Government continue its efforts and remain steadfast in the endeavor to combat substance abuse.” The court also acknowledged the petitioner’s significant contribution in bringing the issue to light and appreciated their unwavering efforts.

The PIL raised concerns about the lack of regulation and oversight of private rehabilitation centers, while acknowledging the existing frameworks for government-run centers. The court noted the report of the amicus curiae, who emphasized the need for evidence-based medical practices and consensual treatment for addiction, along with the regulation of private rehabilitation centers.

The court further highlighted the initiatives undertaken by the Government of India, including the comprehensive survey on substance use, the National Action Plan for Drug Demand Reduction (NAPDDR), and the Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan (NMBA) aimed at counseling, treatment, capacity building, and awareness programs. These efforts reflect the government’s commitment to combating substance abuse and addiction.

Recognizing the progress made by the government, the court expressed satisfaction with the steps taken to address the issues raised in the PIL. However, it emphasized the need for sustained attention and a multifaceted approach, stating, “By doing so, the Government can contribute to the overall betterment of society and protect public health.”

With many of the reliefs sought in the petition already addressed by the government’s actions, the court disposed of the PIL. While the petitioner had unfortunately passed away before the final hearing, the court acknowledged their significant contribution in bringing attention to the critical issue of substance abuse and rehabilitation.

This judgment serves as a clarion call for the government to continue its efforts and ensure the effective regulation and management of drug and alcohol de-addiction centers across the country. By doing so, it aims to create a healthier and more informed society, free from the clutches of substance abuse.

Date of Decision: 20th July, 2023

RAJIV BOOLCHAND JAIN vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS    

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Rajiv-BOOLCHAND-Vs-State-20-July-23.pdf"]

Latest Legal News