Knife Never Found, Depth of Wounds Unknown: Delhi HC Refuses To Upgrade Stabbing Conviction From Grievous Hurt To Attempt To Murder 'AL KAMDHENU GOLD' Belongs To Kamdhenu, Not Ashiana: Delhi HC Finds 2002 Agreement Was A Licence, Not An Assignment — Grants Injunction Against Steel Rival Land Acquired In 2004 At ₹19,660/sq.m — Company Can Now Claim ₹1,30,000/sq.m After Neighbour's Plot Gets That Rate: Delhi HC Allows Amendment After 16 Years State Used Eminent Domain to Hand Over 53 Acres to a Non-Existent Company: Karnataka High Court Quashes Acquisition, Orders CBI Investigation Trademark | Passing Off Action Requires Only Likelihood Of Confusion, Not Strict Proof Of Counterfeiting: Madras High Court Buyer Failing To Pay Full Amount On Time Cannot Sustain Cheating Case If Seller Transfers Property To Third Party: Madhya Pradesh High Court State Cannot Arbitrarily Deviate From Merit-Based Posting SOP For Senior Resident Doctors: Calcutta High Court Ready Reckoner Rates Cannot Form Sole Basis For Determining Land Acquisition Compensation: Bombay High Court MACT Cannot Decide Personal Accident Claims of Vehicle Owners: Madras High Court Sets Aside Rs. 15 Lakh Award Specific Performance | Sale Agreement to Cheat Stamp Duty Is Void, But Buyer Still Gets Money Back: Madras High Court Higher Degree Cannot Substitute Essential Work Experience; Preference Operates Only Among Eligible Candidates: Supreme Court Legal Representatives Aggrieved By Arbitral Award Must Challenge It Under Section 34 Arbitration Act, Not Article 227: Supreme Court Advocates Can’t Use Press Conferences To Scandalise Judges; Grievances Must Be Ventilated Through Legal Remedies: Supreme Court Property Register Entry Not Proof Of Ownership: Supreme Court Judicial Integrity Cannot Be Put To Trial By Litigants: Delhi High Court Dismisses Recusal Pleas Of Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia & Others

Delhi High Court Addresses Urgent Need for Regulation of Drug and Alcohol De-addiction Centers in a PIL

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


“It is crucial that the Government continue its efforts and remain steadfast in the endeavor to combat substance abuse.” Delhi High Court.

In a significant development, the High Court of Delhi has addressed the pressing issue of unregulated drug and alcohol de-addiction centers in India. The court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought crucial reliefs to tackle the rampant problem of substance abuse and addiction. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Chief Justice and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, recognized the importance of regulation and monitoring of these centers to protect public health and combat the erosion of the social fabric.

Highlighting the urgency of the matter, the court stated in its judgment, Government of India tackles this problem through ‘supply reduction’ and ‘demand reduction’... It is crucial that the Government continue its efforts and remain steadfast in the endeavor to combat substance abuse.” The court also acknowledged the petitioner’s significant contribution in bringing the issue to light and appreciated their unwavering efforts.

The PIL raised concerns about the lack of regulation and oversight of private rehabilitation centers, while acknowledging the existing frameworks for government-run centers. The court noted the report of the amicus curiae, who emphasized the need for evidence-based medical practices and consensual treatment for addiction, along with the regulation of private rehabilitation centers.

The court further highlighted the initiatives undertaken by the Government of India, including the comprehensive survey on substance use, the National Action Plan for Drug Demand Reduction (NAPDDR), and the Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan (NMBA) aimed at counseling, treatment, capacity building, and awareness programs. These efforts reflect the government’s commitment to combating substance abuse and addiction.

Recognizing the progress made by the government, the court expressed satisfaction with the steps taken to address the issues raised in the PIL. However, it emphasized the need for sustained attention and a multifaceted approach, stating, “By doing so, the Government can contribute to the overall betterment of society and protect public health.”

With many of the reliefs sought in the petition already addressed by the government’s actions, the court disposed of the PIL. While the petitioner had unfortunately passed away before the final hearing, the court acknowledged their significant contribution in bringing attention to the critical issue of substance abuse and rehabilitation.

This judgment serves as a clarion call for the government to continue its efforts and ensure the effective regulation and management of drug and alcohol de-addiction centers across the country. By doing so, it aims to create a healthier and more informed society, free from the clutches of substance abuse.

Date of Decision: 20th July, 2023

RAJIV BOOLCHAND JAIN vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS    

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Rajiv-BOOLCHAND-Vs-State-20-July-23.pdf"]

Latest Legal News