Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court Mother Killing Minor Children Over Husband's Refusal To Take Her To Workplace Is Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Of Registered Agreement To Sell Is No Longer Discretionary Post-2018 Amendment: Allahabad High Court Civil Court Has Jurisdiction To Determine If Tenanted Property Belongs To Joint Family Even If Tenancy Order Stands In Individual Karta's Name: Bombay High Court Notice Under Section 107 BNSS Mandatory Before Attaching Property; Right To Property Is A Constitutional Right: Calcutta High Court Post-Cognizance Arrest 'Makes No Sense' If Investigation Completed Without Arrest: Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under BNSS Criminal Courts Cannot Be Used To Settle Civil Inheritance Disputes Over Appreciated Land Values: Gujarat High Court Quashes Fraud Case Accused Must Raise Probable Defence To Rebut Statutory Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act If Signatures Are Undisputed: Himachal Pradesh High Court Passing Departmental Exam Not A Pre-requisite For Grant Of ACP/MACP Benefits: Jharkhand High Court Convenience Of Family And Accused Paramount For Jail Shifting; Trial Court Can't Reject Application Merely For Non-Residency: J&K High Court Litigants Who Attempt To Pollute The Stream Of Justice With Tainted Hands Are Not Entitled To Any Relief: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Must Implement Modified Preliminary Decree In Full: Telangana High Court Directs Partition Of Property Omitted In Final Decree Proceedings If Grievance Is Real But Lies Before Different Forum, Plaint Should Be Returned Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC, Not Rejected: Rajasthan High Court Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Severity Of Economic Offence If Evidence Is Documentary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Non-Compliance With Mandatory Duty To Inform Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Is Impermissible: Orissa High Court Grants Bail Land Acquisition Award Finality Under Section 12 Is A Bar To Writ Petitions Challenging 'Public Necessity': Madhya Pradesh High Court State As Eminent Domain Is Obligated To Pay Adequate Compensation, Not Minimum To Suit Its Convenience: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Grants Emergency Parole To Life Convict To Execute Sale Deed, Repay Bank Loan To Prevent Family's Eviction High Court Cannot Act As Court Of First Instance In Service Matters Amenable To CAT Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Election Tribunal Has No Jurisdiction To Declare Caste Certificate Forged, Authority Vests Solely With Scrutiny Committee: Allahabad High Court Order IX Rule 7 CPC Requires 'Good Cause' Not 'Sufficient Cause'; Trial Court Can't Apply Higher Threshold To Pre-Decree Proceedings: Telangana High Court Victim Cannot Maintain Appeal Seeking Enhancement Of Sentence Under Section 372 CrPC; Such Power Exclusively With State: Rajasthan High Court Disability Pension: Presumption In Favour Of Personnel If Found Fit At Enrollment; Percentage Must Be Rounded Off: Punjab & Haryana HC Employee Entitled To Second Kramonnati Benefit If Promotion To Higher Post Does Not Result In Higher Pay Scale: Madhya Pradesh High Court Borrowers Can Be Granted Opportunity To Clear Loan Overdues In Installments To Prevent Coercive Action Under SARFAESI Act: Kerala High Court

Delay in Compliance of NDPS Act Procedures Not Ground for Bail: Delhi High Court Upholds Rigorous Standards”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court today upheld the stringent standards of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), with Justice Amit Bansal denying bail to Somdutt Singh @ Shivam in a high-profile narcotics case. The court emphasized that “mere delayed compliance [of Section 52-A of the NDPS Act] cannot be a ground for grant of bail,” setting a precedent for future narcotics-related legal proceedings.

Somdutt Singh, detained since April 2021, faced charges of trafficking commercial quantities of psychotropic substances. His bail application was scrutinized against the backdrop of stringent NDPS Act provisions, with the court finding overwhelming evidence of his involvement in the illicit drug trade. This included substantial recoveries of psychotropic substances and incriminating digital communications.

The judgment delved into the procedural nuances of the NDPS Act, particularly focusing on Sections 42 and 52-A, which relate to the seizure and sampling of contraband substances. Justice Bansal’s assertion that procedural delays under these sections are not sufficient grounds for bail highlights the court’s commitment to upholding the law’s integrity while balancing individual rights.

Represented by advocates Mr. Pritish Sabharwal and Mr. Sharad Pandey, the petitioner’s arguments centered around alleged procedural lapses and the inadmissibility of certain evidence. However, these were effectively countered by the NCB’s Senior Standing Counsel, Mr. Subhash Bansal, with Mr. Raghav Bansal, who argued for the necessity of strict adherence to legal procedures in NDPS cases.

Date of Decision: 1st December, 2023

SOMDUTT SINGH @ SHIVAM  VS NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU

Latest Legal News