Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

Conditional Liberty Must Override Statutory Embargo,” Rules Rajasthan High Court in Espionage Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling that underscores the balance between national security concerns and individual rights, the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur granted bail to Vikas Kumar, who has been in custody since June 8, 2020, on espionage charges. The case, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Upman, highlights the crucial interplay between prolonged custody and constitutional rights.

Vikas Kumar, accused of providing confidential military information to Pakistani intelligence, was detained under the Official Secrets Act, 1923, and Section 120-B of the IPC. Despite two previous bail applications being dismissed, the court’s latest decision pivots on the principle that “this lethargic attitude of the prosecution is seriously violating the fundamental right of the speedy trial of the petitioner as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.”

Justice Upman, in his judgment, emphasized the importance of conditional liberty in cases where statutory processes have been prolonged unduly. He stated, “In such a situation, the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo.” This statement formed the crux of the ruling that granted bail to Kumar, underlining the court’s commitment to safeguarding individual rights even amid grave allegations.

The judgment draws attention to Sections 437(6) and 436-A of the Criminal Procedure Code. Section 437(6) mandates release on bail if a trial is not concluded within 60 days from the first date fixed for taking evidence, provided the delay is not attributable to the accused. Kumar’s case met these criteria, as the trial had exceeded the 60-day limit, and only two of the 37 prosecution witnesses had been examined.

Furthermore, Justice Upman noted that Kumar had already served half of the maximum potential sentence, invoking Section 436-A of the Cr.P.C., which concerns the duration an undertrial prisoner can be detained. The ruling, thus, reflects a nuanced understanding of the legal provisions concerning bail and the right to a speedy trial.

Date of Pronouncement: 29/11/2023

Vikas Kumar VS State of Rajasthan         

Latest Legal News