Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Custodial Death | Pendency Of Criminal Trial No Bar For Awarding Compensation Under Public Law Remedy: Gauhati High Court Suit For Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act Barred If Filed Beyond Six Months Of Dispossession: Madras High Court Subsequent Purchaser Is Representative Of Judgment Debtor, Separate Suit Challenging Execution Sale Barred Under Section 47 CPC: Kerala High Court Statutory Bail Restrictions Melt Down When Pre-Trial Detention Is Prolonged & Trial Is Unlikely To Conclude Soon: Delhi High Court Failure To Apprise Accused Of Right Under Section 50 NDPS Act Vitiates Search & Recovery: J&K & Ladakh High Court Section 12(5) Arbitration Act Inapplicable To Proceedings Commenced Before 2015 Amendment; Executing Court Can't Apply Neutrality Norms Retrospectively: Punjab & Haryana High Court Banks Can Share Sale Proceeds Of Secured Assets Outside Liquidation Estate With Homebuyers Under Compromise Agreement: Kerala High Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court

Conditional Liberty Must Override Statutory Embargo,” Rules Rajasthan High Court in Espionage Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling that underscores the balance between national security concerns and individual rights, the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur granted bail to Vikas Kumar, who has been in custody since June 8, 2020, on espionage charges. The case, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Upman, highlights the crucial interplay between prolonged custody and constitutional rights.

Vikas Kumar, accused of providing confidential military information to Pakistani intelligence, was detained under the Official Secrets Act, 1923, and Section 120-B of the IPC. Despite two previous bail applications being dismissed, the court’s latest decision pivots on the principle that “this lethargic attitude of the prosecution is seriously violating the fundamental right of the speedy trial of the petitioner as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.”

Justice Upman, in his judgment, emphasized the importance of conditional liberty in cases where statutory processes have been prolonged unduly. He stated, “In such a situation, the conditional liberty must override the statutory embargo.” This statement formed the crux of the ruling that granted bail to Kumar, underlining the court’s commitment to safeguarding individual rights even amid grave allegations.

The judgment draws attention to Sections 437(6) and 436-A of the Criminal Procedure Code. Section 437(6) mandates release on bail if a trial is not concluded within 60 days from the first date fixed for taking evidence, provided the delay is not attributable to the accused. Kumar’s case met these criteria, as the trial had exceeded the 60-day limit, and only two of the 37 prosecution witnesses had been examined.

Furthermore, Justice Upman noted that Kumar had already served half of the maximum potential sentence, invoking Section 436-A of the Cr.P.C., which concerns the duration an undertrial prisoner can be detained. The ruling, thus, reflects a nuanced understanding of the legal provisions concerning bail and the right to a speedy trial.

Date of Pronouncement: 29/11/2023

Vikas Kumar VS State of Rajasthan         

Latest Legal News