Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC

Calcutta High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Truck Driver for Unlawful Entry into No-Entry Zone

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the Calcutta High Court’s Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri has quashed the criminal proceedings against a truck driver accused of unlawfully entering a designated no-entry zone. Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay, presiding over the case of Jamir Hossain v. The State of West Bengal, determined that the petitioner’s actions did not amount to the offenses alleged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

The complaint against the truck driver was filed by a police officer, stating that the driver had affixed a sticker on the vehicle indicating the “On Duty PDS Food and Supply Department, Government of West Bengal” while entering the no-entry zone. However, the court found that the petitioner’s actions did not fall within the definitions of the offenses mentioned.

Justice Bandyopadhyay highlighted that the intercepted truck and its cargo, consisting of river bedded materials, were not proven to be stolen or disputed. Moreover, the court emphasized that the petitioner’s alleged offense was primarily related to violating traffic rules rather than engaging in fraudulent activities or forgery.

While quashing the criminal case, the court also directed the relevant authorities to establish procedures to prevent traffic rule violations through deceptive means. They were instructed to issue restrictive passes to exempted vehicles and maintain strict vigilance to curb malpractices.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the importance of striking a balance between traffic regulations and ensuring compliance with the law.

Date of Decision: 12th May 2023

Jamir Hossain vs The State of West Bengal

Latest Legal News