Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Beneficiaries of Wakf Property Can Acquire Title Through Adverse Possession, Rules Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking judgment, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that beneficiaries of wakf property can acquire title through adverse possession, even if the property belongs to the waqf. The judgment, delivered by Justices K.M. Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy, clarifies the legal position of beneficiaries and their rights in relation to wakf properties.

Justice K.M. Joseph stated, "A beneficiary of a waqf cannot be described as a stranger to the waqf... A beneficiary of a waqf is not like a trustee, who assumes possession in his character as a Trustee, coming under the restraint of discarding his character as Trustee and donning the robes of an encroacher or a person asserting hostile title."

The court further emphasized that a beneficiary of a waqf should not be considered a fiduciary and does not have a duty to protect the interest of another party. This ruling recognizes the distinct position of beneficiaries and upholds their right to claim adverse possession of wakf properties.

The judgment also addressed the issue of void transactions and the application of the Limitation Act. Justice Hrishikesh Roy noted, "A transfer which is void ab initio is in the eye of the law no transfer at all... The Act cannot revive an extinguished title as nothing stood in the way of running of time from the date of the second sale under the law as it stood."

The Supreme Court's decision sets a significant precedent, providing clarity on the rights of beneficiaries in relation to wakf properties. It establishes that beneficiaries can acquire title through adverse possession, ensuring their rightful claim over the property.

Date of Decision: April 13, 2023

SABIR ALI KHAN vs SYED MOHD. AHMAD ALI KHAN  AND OTHERS 

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/13-Apr-2023-SABIR-ALI-KHAN-Vs-SYED-MOHD.pdf"]                          

Latest Legal News