Benefit Of Acquittal Can Be Extended To Non-Appealing Co-Accused If Prosecution Case Is Found To Be Fundamentally Unreliable: Madras High Court Hindu Marriage Act | Petition For Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Serves As A Valid Defence Against Allegations Of Desertion: Kerala High Court Employee Has No Vested Right To Seek Or Retain Additional Charge; Writ Petition Not Maintainable To Challenge Its Withdrawal: Madhya Pradesh High Court Insurance Act | Insurer Cannot Waive Statutory Deadline For Premium Payment Under Bank Guarantee; No Estoppel Against Statute: NCDRC Absence Of Crime Number In Inquest Report & Discrepancy In Sec 157 CrPC Special Report Renders FIR Doubtful: Allahabad High Court MTP Act  | Termination Of Pregnancy Beyond 24 Weeks Permissible If It Involves Risk To Life Or Grave Injury To Mental Health Of The Victim: Gujarat High Court Section 174A IPC | FIR Cannot Be Quashed If Process Server Reports Indicate Failure To Serve At Ordinary Residence: Delhi High Court Issues Guidelines Insolvency Petition | Transferees Of Debtor Cannot Substitute Debtor To Rebut Allegation Of Intent To Defeat Creditors Under Section 6(b) Provincial Insolvency Act: High Court Medical Negligence | Doctor Cannot Be Held Liable For Choosing One Reasonable Course Of Treatment Over Another: Bombay High Court Cruelty | Non-Registration Of FIR Cannot Be Ground To Discredit Testimony Of Wife Seeking Divorce: Jharkhand High Court No Deception At Inception: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Revive Cheating Charges Against Borrower After One-Time Settlement Consumer Protection Act | Doctrine Of 'Caveat Emptor' Subservient To 'Caveat Venditor'; Auctioneer Liable For Sale Of Encumbered Vehicle: State Commission Section 127 CrPC | Past Compromise Not An Eternal Estoppel To Bar Wife From Seeking Enhancement In Maintenance: Orissa High Court States Can Prescribe Higher Qualifications Than UGC Norms, Additional Tests Promote Meritocracy: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cancel Registered Sale Deed Or Adjudicate Title Disputes: Telangana High Court Principal Employer Cannot Abdicate Statutory Liability For Overtime Wages Of Contract Labour Despite Contractual Indemnity Clauses: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory For Invoking SC/ST Act Provisions If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked For Re-valuation Of Structures Once Compensation Dispute Is Adjudicated Under Section 64 RFCTLARR Act: Telangana High Court Revenue Village Naming | Government Must Ensure Names Do Not Reflect Any Person, Caste, Or Religion Under Policy Guidelines: Rajasthan High Court Section 138 NI Act | Complainant Must Prove Proprietorship Of Firm To Establish Status As 'Payee' Or 'Holder In Due Course': Himachal Pradesh High Court

Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Fundamental Principle

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court reaffirmed the fundamental principle of "Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception." This crucial principle was upheld in a recent judgement delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI on December 15, 2023.

The case in question involved a petition for regular bail filed by the petitioner, SUNNY, who faced charges under Sections 379-B, 411, 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, with Section 394 IPC added later. These charges were related to the alleged snatching of a mobile phone.

The court's observation on this fundamental principle of bail was clear and resolute: "Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception." This principle has been a cornerstone of criminal jurisprudence in India, emphasizing that detention should not be mandatory, especially when other means can secure the presence of the accused for trial.

In its detailed judgement, the court also considered the petitioner's detention for about one year and the fact that neither the complainant nor another victim identified the petitioner as one of the accused. The trial was at an initial stage, and the court took into account the right to a speedy trial and the presumption of innocence of the accused.

The final order of the court granted the concession of regular bail to the petitioner, ordering their release on bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate or trial court.

However, the court made it clear that if the petitioner were found involved in similar offenses in the future, the State had the right to seek the cancellation of the regular bail.

Date of Decision: December 15, 2023

SUNNY VS STATE OF PUNJAB

 

Latest Legal News