IBC Moratorium | Criminal Court Cannot Direct Disbursal Of Corporate Debtor's Assets To Complainant Pending CIRP: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act | Failure To Implead Company As Accused Renders Complaint Fatally Defective; Section 319 CrPC Cannot Be Used To Cure Such Fundamental Defect: Supreme Court 'Last Seen Theory' Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court Acquits Man In Murder Case 'Every Lawyer Has A Duty To Act Decently': Supreme Court Modifies Suspension Of Advocate For Misconduct In Court Premises Mere Declaration Of 'Transitional Area' Under Article 243-Q(1)(a) Of Constitution Does Not Automatically Convert Rural Area Into Urban Area: Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Externment Order, Terms Non-Compliance With Natural Justice A "Travesty Of Constitutional Guarantees" 'Certiorari Is Not Appellate': Supreme Court Rejects Plea In Decades-Old Co-operative Society Membership Dispute Victim Must Authorize Settlement: Supreme Court Rules Informants Cannot Quash Criminal Cases Without Real Victim's Consent State Cannot Pick And Choose: Supreme Court Restores Right To Retrospective Regularisation For Daily Wage Employees Order VI Rule 17 CPC | Amendment of Plaint After Commencement Of Trial Cannot Be Allowed Without Proving Due Diligence: Supreme Court Discrepancy Between Ocular Testimony And Medical Evidence Creates Reasonable Doubt: Supreme Court Order VI Rule 17 & Order VIII Rule 6A CPC | Counter Claim Cannot Be Permitted After Trial Concludes When Party Fails To Pay Court Fees Initially: Supreme Court Nominee Holds Insurance Proceeds In Trust For Legal Heirs; Supreme Court Directs Equitable Distribution Pending Succession Proceedings PC Act | Court Must Impose Statutory Minimum Imprisonment Upon Conviction Under Sections 7 And 13(2): Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Corruption Case Against Official Caught In Factional Crossfire Retaliatory Counterblasts Cannot Be Used As Weapons Of Harassment: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Over Civil Land Dispute Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Court Must Defer Question Of Ad-Valorem Court Fee To Evidence When Possession Status Is Disputed: Supreme Court Minor Shortfall In Earnest Money Deposit Does Not Vitiate Auction Sale If It Causes No Prejudice: Supreme Court 'Flimsy And Untenable': Supreme Court Cancels Bail Of Accused In Gruesome 'Petrol-Burning' Murder Case Parity Is Not A Mechanical Mathematical Formula: Supreme Court Rejects Bail Plea Of Murder Accused Article 142 Constitution of India | Supreme Court May Protect Retiral Benefits Of Employees Whose Caste Certificates Are Invalidated In Exceptional Cases Omission Of CGST Rule 96(10) Applies To All Pending Proceedings: Supreme Court Mere Marking Does Not Prove Contents: Supreme Court Clarifies Evidence Law In Testamentary Proceedings Arbitral Tribunal Under Section 16 Of A&C Act Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Determine Arbitrability Of Claims Including Excepted Matters: Supreme Court Arbitration Agreement Can Be Incorporated Into A Personal Guarantee Through A Composite Transaction: Supreme Court

Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Fundamental Principle

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court reaffirmed the fundamental principle of "Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception." This crucial principle was upheld in a recent judgement delivered by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI on December 15, 2023.

The case in question involved a petition for regular bail filed by the petitioner, SUNNY, who faced charges under Sections 379-B, 411, 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, with Section 394 IPC added later. These charges were related to the alleged snatching of a mobile phone.

The court's observation on this fundamental principle of bail was clear and resolute: "Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception." This principle has been a cornerstone of criminal jurisprudence in India, emphasizing that detention should not be mandatory, especially when other means can secure the presence of the accused for trial.

In its detailed judgement, the court also considered the petitioner's detention for about one year and the fact that neither the complainant nor another victim identified the petitioner as one of the accused. The trial was at an initial stage, and the court took into account the right to a speedy trial and the presumption of innocence of the accused.

The final order of the court granted the concession of regular bail to the petitioner, ordering their release on bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Chief Judicial Magistrate or trial court.

However, the court made it clear that if the petitioner were found involved in similar offenses in the future, the State had the right to seek the cancellation of the regular bail.

Date of Decision: December 15, 2023

SUNNY VS STATE OF PUNJAB

 

Latest Legal News