Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Arbitrary No More: Supreme Court Orders Overhaul of Army's Promotion Criteria for Women Officers

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision dated November 3, 2023, the Supreme Court of India, headed by Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, has directed a reassessment for the promotion of women officers in the Indian Army to the rank of Colonel. The apex court, while addressing the grievances of women officers regarding their non-empanelment for promotion, observed, “The nub of the dispute in the present case relates to the manner in which the CRs of the women officers were assessed... the manner in which the cut off has been applied for reckoning CRs of the women officers for empanelment as Colonels is arbitrary.”

The bench, which also included Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra, found that the process used to evaluate the Confidential Reports (CRs) for the promotion of women officers post their Permanent Commission (PC) was not in line with the established policy framework or the earlier judgment of this Court in the case of Lieutenant Colonel Nitisha vs Union of India.

The Supreme Court’s decision rectifies the arbitrariness in the cutoff dates for CRs, which were deemed contrary to the principles laid down in Nitisha’s case and the policy directives of the Army itself. “Such an approach does disservice to the need to provide justice to the women officers who have fought a long and hard battle before this Court,” the bench remarked.

The Court has ordered the convening of a Special No 3 Selection Board within a fortnight from the date of the order, ensuring that all women officers, except those already empaneled, will be reconsidered for promotion.

Date of Decision: November 3, 2023

Nitisha and Others VS Union of India and Others     

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/06-Nov-2023-Nitisha-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News