Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud

A.P. HIGH COURT SLAMS HOD OF ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY - ABRUPTLY CANCELLED ADMISSION - IMPOSES EXEMPLARY COSTS

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, strongly criticized the “extreme perversity” displayed by the Head of the Department of Rural Development in a case involving the cancellation of an admission. The court ordered the withdrawal of the cancellation order and imposed exemplary costs on the responsible authority.

The case revolved around Gurram Bhagyaraju, who had taken admission in the M.A. Rural Development course at Nagarjuna University. Despite meeting the eligibility criteria specified in the prospectus, the Head of the Department abruptly cancelled Bhagyaraju’s admission, citing his postgraduate degree in MBA (I.B.) as a disqualification.

Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, while delivering the judgment, expressed his displeasure with the lack of application of mind by the Head of the Department. The court labeled the decision as “extremely perverse” and detrimental to the petitioner’s future and career.

Justice Prasad stated, “The eligibility conditions for securing admission are clearly set out in the Prospectus. On a perusal of this Prospectus, it appears to this Court that a person of ordinary prudence and minimum education could have read and understood the eligibility conditions.”

To rectify the injustice caused to the petitioner, the court ordered the immediate withdrawal of the cancellation order. Additionally, exemplary costs of Rs. 15,000 were imposed on the Head of the Department, acknowledging the petitioner’s financial burden in pursuing legal recourse.

The court directed the Registrar of Acharya Nagarjuna University to pay the exemplary costs to the petitioner and recover the amount by deducting it from the salary of the Head of the Department. The Registrar was also instructed to file an affidavit of compliance within five weeks.

This judgment serves as a reminder to educational institutions to exercise due diligence and ensure fair and informed decision-making, as the future and careers of students should not be jeopardized by negligent actions.

The case has shed light on the importance of upholding the integrity of admission procedures and holding responsible authorities accountable for their actions.

 Date of Decision: June 15, 2023

GURRAM BHAGYA RAJU VS STATE OF ANDHRA PARDESH ETC

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Gurram-Bhagya-Raju-Versus-State-of-A.P.-15-June-23-Andhra-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News