MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

A.P. HIGH COURT SLAMS HOD OF ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY - ABRUPTLY CANCELLED ADMISSION - IMPOSES EXEMPLARY COSTS

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, strongly criticized the “extreme perversity” displayed by the Head of the Department of Rural Development in a case involving the cancellation of an admission. The court ordered the withdrawal of the cancellation order and imposed exemplary costs on the responsible authority.

The case revolved around Gurram Bhagyaraju, who had taken admission in the M.A. Rural Development course at Nagarjuna University. Despite meeting the eligibility criteria specified in the prospectus, the Head of the Department abruptly cancelled Bhagyaraju’s admission, citing his postgraduate degree in MBA (I.B.) as a disqualification.

Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, while delivering the judgment, expressed his displeasure with the lack of application of mind by the Head of the Department. The court labeled the decision as “extremely perverse” and detrimental to the petitioner’s future and career.

Justice Prasad stated, “The eligibility conditions for securing admission are clearly set out in the Prospectus. On a perusal of this Prospectus, it appears to this Court that a person of ordinary prudence and minimum education could have read and understood the eligibility conditions.”

To rectify the injustice caused to the petitioner, the court ordered the immediate withdrawal of the cancellation order. Additionally, exemplary costs of Rs. 15,000 were imposed on the Head of the Department, acknowledging the petitioner’s financial burden in pursuing legal recourse.

The court directed the Registrar of Acharya Nagarjuna University to pay the exemplary costs to the petitioner and recover the amount by deducting it from the salary of the Head of the Department. The Registrar was also instructed to file an affidavit of compliance within five weeks.

This judgment serves as a reminder to educational institutions to exercise due diligence and ensure fair and informed decision-making, as the future and careers of students should not be jeopardized by negligent actions.

The case has shed light on the importance of upholding the integrity of admission procedures and holding responsible authorities accountable for their actions.

 Date of Decision: June 15, 2023

GURRAM BHAGYA RAJU VS STATE OF ANDHRA PARDESH ETC

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Gurram-Bhagya-Raju-Versus-State-of-A.P.-15-June-23-Andhra-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News