Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

A.P. HIGH COURT SLAMS HOD OF ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY - ABRUPTLY CANCELLED ADMISSION - IMPOSES EXEMPLARY COSTS

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, strongly criticized the “extreme perversity” displayed by the Head of the Department of Rural Development in a case involving the cancellation of an admission. The court ordered the withdrawal of the cancellation order and imposed exemplary costs on the responsible authority.

The case revolved around Gurram Bhagyaraju, who had taken admission in the M.A. Rural Development course at Nagarjuna University. Despite meeting the eligibility criteria specified in the prospectus, the Head of the Department abruptly cancelled Bhagyaraju’s admission, citing his postgraduate degree in MBA (I.B.) as a disqualification.

Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, while delivering the judgment, expressed his displeasure with the lack of application of mind by the Head of the Department. The court labeled the decision as “extremely perverse” and detrimental to the petitioner’s future and career.

Justice Prasad stated, “The eligibility conditions for securing admission are clearly set out in the Prospectus. On a perusal of this Prospectus, it appears to this Court that a person of ordinary prudence and minimum education could have read and understood the eligibility conditions.”

To rectify the injustice caused to the petitioner, the court ordered the immediate withdrawal of the cancellation order. Additionally, exemplary costs of Rs. 15,000 were imposed on the Head of the Department, acknowledging the petitioner’s financial burden in pursuing legal recourse.

The court directed the Registrar of Acharya Nagarjuna University to pay the exemplary costs to the petitioner and recover the amount by deducting it from the salary of the Head of the Department. The Registrar was also instructed to file an affidavit of compliance within five weeks.

This judgment serves as a reminder to educational institutions to exercise due diligence and ensure fair and informed decision-making, as the future and careers of students should not be jeopardized by negligent actions.

The case has shed light on the importance of upholding the integrity of admission procedures and holding responsible authorities accountable for their actions.

 Date of Decision: June 15, 2023

GURRAM BHAGYA RAJU VS STATE OF ANDHRA PARDESH ETC

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Gurram-Bhagya-Raju-Versus-State-of-A.P.-15-June-23-Andhra-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News