Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

A.P. HIGH COURT SLAMS HOD OF ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY - ABRUPTLY CANCELLED ADMISSION - IMPOSES EXEMPLARY COSTS

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati, strongly criticized the “extreme perversity” displayed by the Head of the Department of Rural Development in a case involving the cancellation of an admission. The court ordered the withdrawal of the cancellation order and imposed exemplary costs on the responsible authority.

The case revolved around Gurram Bhagyaraju, who had taken admission in the M.A. Rural Development course at Nagarjuna University. Despite meeting the eligibility criteria specified in the prospectus, the Head of the Department abruptly cancelled Bhagyaraju’s admission, citing his postgraduate degree in MBA (I.B.) as a disqualification.

Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, while delivering the judgment, expressed his displeasure with the lack of application of mind by the Head of the Department. The court labeled the decision as “extremely perverse” and detrimental to the petitioner’s future and career.

Justice Prasad stated, “The eligibility conditions for securing admission are clearly set out in the Prospectus. On a perusal of this Prospectus, it appears to this Court that a person of ordinary prudence and minimum education could have read and understood the eligibility conditions.”

To rectify the injustice caused to the petitioner, the court ordered the immediate withdrawal of the cancellation order. Additionally, exemplary costs of Rs. 15,000 were imposed on the Head of the Department, acknowledging the petitioner’s financial burden in pursuing legal recourse.

The court directed the Registrar of Acharya Nagarjuna University to pay the exemplary costs to the petitioner and recover the amount by deducting it from the salary of the Head of the Department. The Registrar was also instructed to file an affidavit of compliance within five weeks.

This judgment serves as a reminder to educational institutions to exercise due diligence and ensure fair and informed decision-making, as the future and careers of students should not be jeopardized by negligent actions.

The case has shed light on the importance of upholding the integrity of admission procedures and holding responsible authorities accountable for their actions.

 Date of Decision: June 15, 2023

GURRAM BHAGYA RAJU VS STATE OF ANDHRA PARDESH ETC

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Gurram-Bhagya-Raju-Versus-State-of-A.P.-15-June-23-Andhra-HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News