“Possession Follows Title” Not An Absolute Rule When Ownership Is Disputed: Andhra Pradesh High Court ORDER 30 CPC | Appeal Filed by Firm Does Not Abate on Death of Partners: Calcutta High Court Bank Cannot Freeze Customer’s Account Based on Third-Party Dispute: Calcutta High Court Slams Axis Bank Not Every Middleman Is a Trafficker: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail in International Cyber Trafficking Case, Cites Absence of Mens Rea Stay in One Corner Freezes the Whole Map: Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Decades-Old Land Acquisition Despite 11-Year Delay in Award Parole Once Granted Cannot Be Made Illusory by Imposing Impossible Conditions: Rajasthan High Court Declares Mechanical Surety Requirement for Indigent Convicts Unconstitutional Once Acquisition Is Complete, Title Disputes Fall Outside Civil Court Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Appeal Lies Against Lok Adalat Compromise Decree Even on Grounds of Fraud: Orissa High Court Declares First Appeal Not Maintainable POCSO | Absence of Medical Corroboration Not Fatal; Sole Testimony of Minor Victim Sufficient for Conviction: Orissa High Court Limitation Act | Article 137 Applies to Applications Under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC; 3-Year Limit Cannot Be Rendered Illusory: Punjab & Haryana High Court Benami Defence Cannot Override Registered Ownership: Delhi High Court Buries 35-Year-Old Family Settlement Claim Over Property Dispute Off-Road Construction Vehicles Not ‘Motor Vehicles’ Under Law: Supreme Court Quashes Road Tax on Dumpers, Excavators, and Dozers

Allahabad High Court Constitutes Judicial Committee to Investigate Lawyers' Grievances in Hapur Incident

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In an unprecedented move, the Allahabad High Court has constituted a special judicial committee to address grievances pertaining to the recent Hapur Incident involving lawyers. This decision came after the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking an urgent hearing on the matter.

 "We Deem it Appropriate to Refer the Application"

 The bench, comprising Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker and Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, stated in their order, "We deem it appropriate to refer the application dated 7.9.2023 of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, containing its grievances in respect of the incident, to the Committee." The judicial committee will be chaired by Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and includes Justices Rajan Roy and Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, along with the Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh or his nominee, Chairman of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, and the President of the High Court Bar Association.

 Addressing Lawyers' Concerns

 Various issues have been raised by the legal community following the incident in Hapur, Uttar Pradesh. The Bar Council members and other office bearers of the High Court Bar Association presented their concerns during the hearing. The Court directed the Special Investigation Team (SIT), already constituted by the State Government, to update on the action taken concerning the First Information Reports (FIRs) lodged by the lawyers involved in the incident.

 Next Steps

 The bench ordered that the matter be listed on 15th September 2023, on which date the SIT is directed to submit an interim report before the Court. The registry has also been directed to place a copy of the Court’s order before the Chairman of the Committee for further necessary action.

This pivotal decision has highlighted the Court’s commitment to addressing issues affecting the legal community and ensuring that grievances are dealt with in a structured and efficient manner.

F.I.R copy 

D.D-9.9.2023

In Re vs Bar Council Of U.P.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ALLHABAD-High-Court.pdf"]

 

Latest Legal News