Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

Allahabad High Court Constitutes Judicial Committee to Investigate Lawyers' Grievances in Hapur Incident

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In an unprecedented move, the Allahabad High Court has constituted a special judicial committee to address grievances pertaining to the recent Hapur Incident involving lawyers. This decision came after the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking an urgent hearing on the matter.

 "We Deem it Appropriate to Refer the Application"

 The bench, comprising Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker and Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, stated in their order, "We deem it appropriate to refer the application dated 7.9.2023 of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, containing its grievances in respect of the incident, to the Committee." The judicial committee will be chaired by Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and includes Justices Rajan Roy and Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, along with the Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh or his nominee, Chairman of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, and the President of the High Court Bar Association.

 Addressing Lawyers' Concerns

 Various issues have been raised by the legal community following the incident in Hapur, Uttar Pradesh. The Bar Council members and other office bearers of the High Court Bar Association presented their concerns during the hearing. The Court directed the Special Investigation Team (SIT), already constituted by the State Government, to update on the action taken concerning the First Information Reports (FIRs) lodged by the lawyers involved in the incident.

 Next Steps

 The bench ordered that the matter be listed on 15th September 2023, on which date the SIT is directed to submit an interim report before the Court. The registry has also been directed to place a copy of the Court’s order before the Chairman of the Committee for further necessary action.

This pivotal decision has highlighted the Court’s commitment to addressing issues affecting the legal community and ensuring that grievances are dealt with in a structured and efficient manner.

F.I.R copy 

D.D-9.9.2023

In Re vs Bar Council Of U.P.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ALLHABAD-High-Court.pdf"]

 

Latest Legal News