Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Allahabad High Court Constitutes Judicial Committee to Investigate Lawyers' Grievances in Hapur Incident

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In an unprecedented move, the Allahabad High Court has constituted a special judicial committee to address grievances pertaining to the recent Hapur Incident involving lawyers. This decision came after the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking an urgent hearing on the matter.

 "We Deem it Appropriate to Refer the Application"

 The bench, comprising Chief Justice Pritinker Diwaker and Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, stated in their order, "We deem it appropriate to refer the application dated 7.9.2023 of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, containing its grievances in respect of the incident, to the Committee." The judicial committee will be chaired by Justice Manoj Kumar Gupta and includes Justices Rajan Roy and Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, along with the Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh or his nominee, Chairman of the Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, and the President of the High Court Bar Association.

 Addressing Lawyers' Concerns

 Various issues have been raised by the legal community following the incident in Hapur, Uttar Pradesh. The Bar Council members and other office bearers of the High Court Bar Association presented their concerns during the hearing. The Court directed the Special Investigation Team (SIT), already constituted by the State Government, to update on the action taken concerning the First Information Reports (FIRs) lodged by the lawyers involved in the incident.

 Next Steps

 The bench ordered that the matter be listed on 15th September 2023, on which date the SIT is directed to submit an interim report before the Court. The registry has also been directed to place a copy of the Court’s order before the Chairman of the Committee for further necessary action.

This pivotal decision has highlighted the Court’s commitment to addressing issues affecting the legal community and ensuring that grievances are dealt with in a structured and efficient manner.

F.I.R copy 

D.D-9.9.2023

In Re vs Bar Council Of U.P.

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/ALLHABAD-High-Court.pdf"]

 

Latest Legal News