No Arbitration Agreement, No Arbitrator: Supreme Court Voids Award Made Without Municipal Council's Consent, Calls Entire Proceedings "Coram Non Judice" Post-Disposal Miscellaneous Applications Maintainable Only In Rare Situations; Court Becomes Functus Officio After SLP Dismissal: Supreme Court Vague & Omnibus Allegations Against Relatives In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Nipped In The Bud; 7-Year Delay In FIR Fatal: Supreme Court State Can Withdraw Electricity Duty Exemption For Captive Power Plants In Public Interest But Must Give One-Year Notice Period: Supreme Court DSC Personnel Entitled To Second Pension; Shortfall In Service Up To 12 Months Can Be Condoned: Supreme Court Person Professing Christianity Cannot Claim Scheduled Caste Status To Invoke SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Except Matters One May, But Exclude Justice One Cannot: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Award, Holds State Cannot Be Judge In Its Own Cause On Disputed Breach When State Requisitions Your Vehicle For Elections And It Kills Someone, The State Pays — Not Your Insurer: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Financial Burden Cannot Defeat Constitutional Right to Just Compensation: Supreme Court Unsigned Charge Is A Curable Irregularity, Won't Vitiate Trial Unless 'Failure Of Justice' Is Shown: Supreme Court Tenant Files Fresh Petition Before Rent Authority After Supreme Court Dismisses SLP, Review And Misc Application — Court Calls It "Gross Abuse of Process", Voids Restoration Order Taxation Law | Exemption For Naphtha Depends On 'Intended Use' At Procurement, Not Actual Exclusive Use: Supreme Court Army's Own Grading System Worked Against Women Officers For Years — Supreme Court Grants Permanent Commission, Pension To Short Service Women Officers

Accused’s Right to Be Heard in Revision Petition Upheld: P&H High Court Sets Aside Dismissal Order

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in a recent judgment dated November 20, 2023, reaffirmed the right of the accused to be heard in a revision petition filed by the complainant. The court set aside an earlier dismissal order and directed a fresh examination of the case after hearing the accused.

The case, Harinder Singh vs. Rajinder Singh, revolved around the dismissal of a criminal complaint under Sections 420, 406, 465, 466, 467, 471, and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The complaint had been initially dismissed for non-appearance of the complainant. Subsequently, the Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar, Mohali, had set aside the dismissal order and remanded the case for fresh consideration, all without hearing the petitioner-accused.

The crucial legal point addressed in the judgment was the interpretation of Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C). The court cited the precedent set in ‘Manharibhai Muljibhai Kakadia and another versus Shaileshbhai Mohanbhai Patel and others, 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 689,’ to establish that the accused have a right to be heard in a revision petition filed by the complainant when challenging the dismissal of a complaint by the Magistrate.

The High Court, in its observation, stated, “In a revision petition preferred by the complainant before the High Court or the Sessions Judge challenging an order of the Magistrate dismissing the complaint under Section 203 of the Code at the stage under Section 200 or after following the process contemplated under Section 202 of the Code, the accused or a person who is suspected to have committed a crime is entitled to hearing by the revisional court.”

The judgment emphasized the importance of ensuring due process and the right to be heard for the accused, even in cases where a complaint has been dismissed. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the Sessions Judge was directed to reexamine the matter after affording the accused an opportunity to present their case.

Date of Decision: 20 November 2023

Harinder Singh VS Rajinder Singh

Latest Legal News