MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

20 Years' jail For 5 Men Who Gangraped School Teacher : Bombay HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Recently, The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction and 20 years of rigorous imprisonment of five men who posed as policemen, kidnapped a 21-year-old schoolteacher, and raped her [Ashwin s/o Ashok Donode & others vs. State of Maharashtra].

A divisional bench composed of Justices Sunil Shukre and Govind Sanap determined that this was not a case of false implication, as the accused had claimed when they claimed to be at odds with the victim.

"The unfortunate victim in her prime of life was subjected to a vicious assault by the accused. Her womanhood, pride, prestige, and dignity were violated based on how she was treated during the incident. The accused individuals indulged their lust in a disgraceful manner. The accused took advantage of the circumstance, "court stated.

The bench was seized of criminal appeals filed by Ashwin Donode (28), Anil Ingle (35), Roshan Ingle (35), Pundlik Bhoyar (34), and Mohammad Afroz Pathan (38) on October 23, 2018 against the order issued by a sessions court in Nagpur.

All of them were convicted by the sessions court on charges of gangrape (376D), kidnapping (366), common intent (34) and criminal intimidation (506) under the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

According to the prosecution, the victim, a teacher at a convent school, and a male friend were standing near a highway in Nagpur at approximately 8 p.m. on December 1, 2014, when the accused, who were on their bikes, stopped and asked what she and the boy were doing on the highway.

They pretended to be police officers. When she asked to see their identification cards, the men forced her to sit on her motorcycle and made her friend sit on another motorcycle. They then threatened them with a knife and demanded cooperation.

Sensing danger, her friend fled and ran to a nearby police station for assistance, but the girl had already been taken to a forest area and raped.

In its order, the court noted that the victim's testimony was credible because she had described the incident in detail and remained steadfast on her statements under cross-examination.

It was noted that the victim was able to identify all of the accused because she had seen them from the light of their bicycles as they assaulted her.

The court also noted that one of the defendants, Bhoyar, was unable to engage in sexual activity with the victim due to a fractured leg. However, he was convicted because his sperm was discovered in the victim's cervix.

"It should be noted that in such a state of fear, the victim may not have felt the penetration. However, a positive DNA report indicates that the accused also had a penetrating sexual encounter with the victim; otherwise, his sperm would not have been detected in the victim's cervix "Judges observed.

Regarding the defendant's claim that the victim did not sustain any injuries, the court reasoned that she would have been defenceless and thus submitted.

"On the basis of the victim's vivid firsthand account of the incident, one can visualise the victim's precarious position in the custody of the accused. The perpetrator had been threatened with dire consequences if she did not submit to their lust. Two minor injuries were present on her back. Major injuries may not have occurred because the victim was defenceless and unable to resist. The only option available to the victim was to comply with the demands of the accused "The bench expressed its opinion.

The court also considered the DNA results that linked all five suspects to the crime.

C R Thakur and S R Shinde represented the defendants in court.

S S Doifode, an assistant public prosecutor, represented the state.

D.D:20-07-2022

Ashwin s/o Ashok Donode & others Vs State of Maharashtra

Latest Legal News