Unregistered Agreement Of Sale Entered Before Attachment Cannot Defeat Decree-Holder’s Claim: Andhra Pradesh High Court No Presumption That Joint Family Possesses Joint Property; Female Hindu Absolute Owner Of Property Purchased In Her Name: Allahabad High Court Age Determination Must Strictly Follow Hierarchy Of Documents Under JJ Act: Orissa High Court Acquits Man Of POCSO Charges Once 'C' Form Declarations Are Signed, Burden Shifts To Buyer To Prove Payment Of Outstanding Dues: Madras High Court Section 213 Succession Act No Bar To Eviction Suit If Claim Is Based On Landlord-Tenant Relationship, Not Title Under Will: Bombay High Court Meritorious Candidate Wrongfully Denied Appointment Entitled To Notional Seniority & Old Pension Scheme: J&K & Ladakh High Court 6-Year Delay In Propounding Will & Hostile Attesting Witness Constitute 'Grave Suspicious Circumstances': Delhi High Court Refuses Probate Section 319 CrPC Power Cannot Be Exercised Based On FIR Or Section 161 Statements: Allahabad High Court Quashes Summoning Of Unmarried Sisters Bail Proceedings Cannot Be Converted Into Recovery Proceedings; Court Can't Order Sale Of Accused's Property: Supreme Court Able-Bodied Husband Cannot Defeat Maintenance Claim By Projecting Income Below Minimum Wages: Delhi High Court Recording Section 313 CrPC Statement Before Cross-Examination Of Prosecution Witness Does Not Vitiate Trial: Karnataka High Court Murder By Unknown Assailants Is Not 'Accidental Death' Under Mukhymantri Kisan Bima Yojna: Allahabad High Court Section 311 CrPC | Court Not A Passive Bystander, Must Summon Material Witness If Essential For Just Decision: Rajasthan High Court GST Act Does Not Prima Facie Prohibit Consolidated Show-Cause Notices For Multiple Years: Bombay HC Refers Issue To Larger Bench 90% Burn Injuries No Bar To Making Statement; Dying Declaration Can Be Sole Basis For Conviction If Found Truthful: Madhya Pradesh High Court

20 Years' jail For 5 Men Who Gangraped School Teacher : Bombay HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Recently, The Bombay High Court upheld the conviction and 20 years of rigorous imprisonment of five men who posed as policemen, kidnapped a 21-year-old schoolteacher, and raped her [Ashwin s/o Ashok Donode & others vs. State of Maharashtra].

A divisional bench composed of Justices Sunil Shukre and Govind Sanap determined that this was not a case of false implication, as the accused had claimed when they claimed to be at odds with the victim.

"The unfortunate victim in her prime of life was subjected to a vicious assault by the accused. Her womanhood, pride, prestige, and dignity were violated based on how she was treated during the incident. The accused individuals indulged their lust in a disgraceful manner. The accused took advantage of the circumstance, "court stated.

The bench was seized of criminal appeals filed by Ashwin Donode (28), Anil Ingle (35), Roshan Ingle (35), Pundlik Bhoyar (34), and Mohammad Afroz Pathan (38) on October 23, 2018 against the order issued by a sessions court in Nagpur.

All of them were convicted by the sessions court on charges of gangrape (376D), kidnapping (366), common intent (34) and criminal intimidation (506) under the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

According to the prosecution, the victim, a teacher at a convent school, and a male friend were standing near a highway in Nagpur at approximately 8 p.m. on December 1, 2014, when the accused, who were on their bikes, stopped and asked what she and the boy were doing on the highway.

They pretended to be police officers. When she asked to see their identification cards, the men forced her to sit on her motorcycle and made her friend sit on another motorcycle. They then threatened them with a knife and demanded cooperation.

Sensing danger, her friend fled and ran to a nearby police station for assistance, but the girl had already been taken to a forest area and raped.

In its order, the court noted that the victim's testimony was credible because she had described the incident in detail and remained steadfast on her statements under cross-examination.

It was noted that the victim was able to identify all of the accused because she had seen them from the light of their bicycles as they assaulted her.

The court also noted that one of the defendants, Bhoyar, was unable to engage in sexual activity with the victim due to a fractured leg. However, he was convicted because his sperm was discovered in the victim's cervix.

"It should be noted that in such a state of fear, the victim may not have felt the penetration. However, a positive DNA report indicates that the accused also had a penetrating sexual encounter with the victim; otherwise, his sperm would not have been detected in the victim's cervix "Judges observed.

Regarding the defendant's claim that the victim did not sustain any injuries, the court reasoned that she would have been defenceless and thus submitted.

"On the basis of the victim's vivid firsthand account of the incident, one can visualise the victim's precarious position in the custody of the accused. The perpetrator had been threatened with dire consequences if she did not submit to their lust. Two minor injuries were present on her back. Major injuries may not have occurred because the victim was defenceless and unable to resist. The only option available to the victim was to comply with the demands of the accused "The bench expressed its opinion.

The court also considered the DNA results that linked all five suspects to the crime.

C R Thakur and S R Shinde represented the defendants in court.

S S Doifode, an assistant public prosecutor, represented the state.

D.D:20-07-2022

Ashwin s/o Ashok Donode & others Vs State of Maharashtra

Latest Legal News