Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court Ban Junk Food Within 50 Metres Of Schools: Rajasthan High Court Takes Suo Moto Cognizance To Enforce FSSAI Norms, Protect Children From Obesity

"High Court Advocates for Fair Trial Scheduling: 'Lawyer's Convenience Must Be Considered'

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment that underscores the importance of considering the convenience of lawyers while scheduling trials, the High Court of Kerala, led by the Honorable Mr. Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan, has set a precedent for a more balanced approach in the judicial process.

The judgment, delivered on November 3, 2023, in the case of CRL.MC NO. 9209 of 2023, involved the rescheduling of a murder trial initially dismissed by the Additional Sessions Court, Palakkad. The High Court's intervention was sought after the lower court's decision, which was influenced by a High Court directive for the swift disposal of murder cases.

Justice Kunhikrishnan, in his ruling, emphasized, "These are fundamental things to be considered by the trial court at the time when the case is posted for trial." He highlighted that while the expeditious disposal of cases is essential, it should not overshadow the fundamental rights of the accused, including the right to choose their legal representation.

The judgment further noted that "Accused has got a right to choose his lawyer for conducting the trial and hence the convenience of the lawyer also should be taken care of by the Court." This observation is pivotal in ensuring that the scheduling of trials is not just a unilateral decision but a process that respects the needs of all parties involved, including the legal representatives.

Advocate V.A. Johnson, representing the petitioners, welcomed the judgment, stating that it reinforces the principle of fairness in the legal process. The Public Prosecutor, Smt Sreeja V, also acknowledged the judgment's significance in balancing the need for timely justice with the practicalities of legal representation.

The High Court's directive to the Additional Sessions Court-II, Palakkad, to reconsider the application for rescheduling the trial in light of this judgment, marks a crucial step in ensuring a judicious balance between the expeditious disposal of cases and the rights of the accused to fair representation.

This landmark decision is expected to influence future cases where trial scheduling conflicts with the availability of legal counsel, ensuring a fairer and more equitable justice system.

 Date of Decision- 3rd November 2023

VISHNU VS STATE OF KERALA

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Kerl-03-Nov-23-Vishnu-Vs-State1.pdf"]

Latest Legal News