(1)
NARASIMHARAJU …APPELLANT Vs.
1. T.S.RAMESH S/O.SIDDAPPA
2. JAYAMMA W/O.SIDDAPPA
3. STATE OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS D.D
28/11/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Appeal – Appeal against Acquittal – Appellant challenging the acquittal of respondents for offences under Sections 498A, 302, 304B of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act – Allegation of dowry death and murder of the appellant's sister, Sumalatha, by setting her on fire. [Para 1, 6]
Dowry Death – Evidence of Dowry and Harassment – Insuffi...
(2)
STATE OF KARNATAKA …APPELLANT Vs.
1. VENUGOPAL @ VENU
2. PAVANKUMAR @ PAVAN …RESPONDENTS D.D
28/11/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Appeal – Challenge Against Acquittal in Robbery Case - State of Karnataka's appeal against the acquittal of respondents for an offence punishable under Section 395 of IPC. The incident involved hijacking the complainant's car and stealing valuables on the night of November 4-5, 2010. The Trial Court acquitted the accused, leading to this appeal by the State. [Para 1-5]
&n...
(3)
STATE OF KARNATAKA …APPELLANT Vs.
VENUGOPAL @ VENU and Others …RESPONDENTS D.D
28/11/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Appeal – Acquittal in Robbery Case – Appeal by State against acquittal in a robbery case involving accused Nos. 2 and 3 – Incident involving carjacking and theft of cash, gold chain, and mobile phone – Trial court's acquittal based on insufficient evidence and discrepancies in prosecution’s case. [Para 1-6, 15-26]
Evidence and Witnesses &ndas...
(4)
xxx Vs.
xxx D.D
28/11/2023
HIGH COURTS
Property Dispute – Title and boundary dispute over a 15.89 cents of land – Plaintiff claimed ownership and possession of specific plots in the land – Defendants contested the claim – Trial Court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, confirming his title and directing boundary fixation – First Appellate Court upheld the decision – Appeal to the High Court challengin...
(5)
NARASIMHARAJU …Appellant Vs.
1. T.S. RAMESH
2. JAYAMMA
3. STATE OF KARNATAKA …Respondents D.D
28/11/2023
HIGH COURTS
Alleged Dowry Death and Murder – Acquittal of Accused - appeal challenges the acquittal of respondents in a case involving the alleged dowry death and murder of Sumalatha, sister of the appellant. The trial court acquitted the respondents, and the appellant seeks to overturn this decision. [Paras 1, 6]
Evidence and Witness Testimonies – Inconsistencies and Lack of Corrobor...
(6)
MR MURALI V ...PETITIONER Vs.
STATE OF KARNATAKA and Others ….Respondents D.D
27/11/2023
HIGH COURTS
Bail Cancellation – Criminal Petition for Canceling Bail Order – Petition to cancel bail order dated 10.04.2023 granted by XXVI Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru in S.C.No.2246/2022 for offenses under IPC Sections 302, 504, 506 – Allegation of violation of bail conditions and no change in circumstances since earlier rejections of bail applications. [Paras 1, 4...
(7)
SHANAVAS P., MANAGING PARTNER, FORTIS MARKETING …….Revision/Petitioner Vs.
M/S. BABIN TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. And Others …….Respondents D.D
24/11/2023
HIGH COURTS
Cheque Dishonour – Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act – Conviction of the revision petitioner under Section 138 upheld by Sessions Court – Revision petitioner’s appeal against conviction and sentence. [Para 1, 4-5]
Legal Competence of Power of Attorney Holder to File Complaint – Challenge to the competence of PW1 to file the complaint on behalf of the co...
(8)
Musmat Shanti Devi and Others ... ... Petitioners Vs.
Lallu Ram Son of Ganga Ram and Others ...... Opposite Parties D.D
24/11/2023
HIGH COURTS
Civil Revision – Rejection of Plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC – Petitioners challenging trial court’s order rejecting application for dismissal of plaint based on unregistered contract for sale. The trial court’s decision to proceed with the suit is upheld.
Specific Performance – Unregistered Agreement to Sell – Examination of Section 17(1A) of the Registrat...
(9)
Arun Wadhwa and another ....Petitioners Vs.
M/s Chandan Textiles and others ....Respondents D.D
24/11/2023
HIGH COURTS
Plaint Rejection Application – Defendants No.3 and 4 (Petitioners) – Request for Rejection of Plaint Against Them – Petitioners filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for rejection of plaint, arguing they are not concerned with defendant No.1’s business and are wrongly implicated. [Paras 1, 4]
Suit Details – Recovery of `18,91,005/- and Permanent ...