(1)
CHUHAR CHAND AND ORS. .....Petitioners Vs.
ADDL. DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION, PUNJAB AND ORS. ....Respondents D.D
10/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Land Dispute - Challenge to dismissal order under Section 42 of the Consolidation Act, 1948 - Disputed lands and question of title - Jurisdiction of Consolidation Authorities - Necessity to raise the question of title before a competent civil court - Impugned order found to be in alignment with legal precedent. [Para 1-4]
Legal Mandate - Prohibition against redistributing or repartitioning disp...
(2)
CHUHAR CHAND AND ORS. .....Petitioners Vs.
ADDL. DIRECTOR CONSOLIDATION, PUNJAB AND ORS. ....Respondents D.D
10/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Land Dispute - Challenge to dismissal order under Section 42 of the Consolidation Act, 1948 - Disputed lands and question of title - Jurisdiction of Consolidation Authorities - Necessity to raise the question of title before a competent civil court - Impugned order found to be in alignment with legal precedent. [Para 1-4]
Legal Mandate - Prohibition against redistributing or repartitioning disp...
(3)
Manpreet Kaur ....Petitioner Vs.
State of Punjab ...Respondent D.D
10/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Regular Bail - Prolonged Custody - Right to Speedy Trial - Circumstantial Evidence - Medical Reports - Fairness in Trial - Article 21 of the Constitution - Petitioner, a mother of a minor child, seeks regular bail in a murder case where she is accused of killing her husband due to an alleged illicit relationship. The prosecution's case relies on circumstantial evidence, with key witnesses not ...
(4)
Nirmal Kaur …Petitioner Vs.
State of Punjab …Respondent D.D
10/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Bail Petition for NDPS Act Offense - Nirmal Kaur's petition for regular bail in FIR No.177 dated 07.07.2021 under Sections 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Division No.6, Ludhiana - Allegations of selling intoxicant powder and recovery of Alprazolam tablets and intoxicant powder from petitioner and her son [Paras 1-2].
Contention of False Implication - Petitione...
(5)
Sandeep Singh Bal. ......Petitioner. Vs.
State of Punjab. ......Respondent. D.D
10/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Bail – Regular Bail – Accused charged under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC – Allegation of forgery and cheating the Bank – Petitioner's claim of being a guarantor of the loan – Co-accused granted bail – Petitioner in custody since August 29, 2023 – None of the 23 prosecution witnesses examined – No significant evidence o...
(6)
SASIDHARAN A. …APPELLANT/COMPLAINANT Vs.
VIJAYAN UNNITHAN,
THE STATE OF KERALA …RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED D.D
09/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Cheque Dishonour – Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act – Appeal against acquittal of the first respondent for dishonour of a cheque worth Rs. 50,000 due to alleged insufficiency of funds – Trial court acquitted the respondent, leading to this appeal. [Paras 1, 4]
Evidence and Witness Testimonies – Appellant, examined as PW1, submitted evidence including t...
(7)
R.Ochappan ... Revision Petitioner Vs.
Keerthana ... Respondent D.D
09/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Matrimonial Law - Maintenance Petition for Children – Filed by Keerthana against her father, R. Ochappan, under Section 125 Cr.P.C. – Seeking maintenance for herself and her minor brother after their parents' divorce – Maintenance initially denied by trial court, later granted by revisional court under Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. [Paras 2, 3.1, 3.3]
Dismissal...
(8)
A.K. SUD AND OTHERS. ..Petitioners Vs.
REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES PUNJAB. ..Respondent D.D
09/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Quashing of Complaint and Summoning Order – Section 482 of Cr.P.C. – Petitioners, former employees of financial institutions, sought quashing of complaint and summoning order for charges under Section 58A(10) of the Companies Act, 1956, related to non-repayment of deposits by Euro Cotspin Limited. [Para 1]
Facts and Background – Euro Cotspin Limited failed to repay d...
(9)
Deepak Kumar ......... Petitioner Vs.
Union of India and others ......... Respondents D.D
09/01/2024
HIGH COURTS
Cancellation of Appointment Letter Challenged – Petitioner's appointment in ITBP cancelled after disclosing past criminal case involvement, despite acquittal – Ministry of Home Affairs guidelines cited for cancellation – Issue of whether acquittal on benefit of doubt bars appointment in armed forces. [Paras 1-3, 5, 7, 19]
Legal Principles on Acquittal and Employment &ndash...