Abandoning Arbitration Proceedings Bars Fresh Section 11 Application On Same Cause Of Action: Supreme Court Department Must Lead Evidence, Examine Witnesses To Prove Charges Unless Employee Clearly Admits Guilt: Supreme Court Order IX Rule 13 And Section 96 CPC Have Distinct Scopes; Minor Unrepresented In Original Suit Can Seek Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree: Supreme Court Minor Heir Cannot Be Expected To Respond To Public Notice Independently: Supreme Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Succession Certificate Supreme Court Restores Acquittal In POCSO Case, Holds DNA Evidence Not Infallible If Blood Sample Collection Is Disputed Bar Under Section 197 CrPC Applies At Stage Of Cognizance; Subsequent Notification Cannot Invalidate Valid Proceedings: Supreme Court State Cannot Apply Harsher Remission Policy Retrospectively To Deny Premature Release: Supreme Court Superficial Bail Orders In Dowry Death Cases Weaken Public Faith In Judiciary: Supreme Court Cancels Husband's Bail Non-Deposit of Balance Amount During Suit Doesn't Prove Lack Of Readiness: Bombay High Court Grants Specific Performance Of 1978 Oral Agreement Teacher Appointed In 'Pass' Graduate Category Entitled To Higher Pay Scale Upon Acquiring Master's Degree During Service: Calcutta High Court Ex-Parte Maintenance Order Under Section 144 BNSS Must Be Challenged Before Family Court First, Direct Revision Not Maintainable: Allahabad High Court Occupant Cannot Be Denied Electricity Merely Because Decree-Holder Demands Disconnection Pending Eviction: Andhra Pradesh High Court Anticipatory Bail In PMLA Cannot Be Granted If Accused Obstructs Probe & Gives False Answers Even If Beneficiary Of Section 45 Proviso: Delhi High Court Tender Condition Disqualifying Bidders For Past Bridge Collapses Does Not Amount To Blacklisting: Gauhati High Court Mere Unauthorized Entry On Government Land Does Not Constitute Criminal Trespass Without Intent To Annoy: Himachal Pradesh High Court Mere Buildings Without Life-Saving Machinery Don't Fulfil Article 21 Mandate: Jharkhand HC Orders State-Wide Functional Burn Wards Within 120 Days Unestablished Claim Of Co-Heirship Does Not Mandate Reference To Civil Court For Apportionment Of NHAI Compensation: J&K High Court Accused Cannot Defer Cross-Examination By Merely Claiming Defence Strategy Will Be Disclosed: Madhya Pradesh High Court Allegations Confined To Negligence, Not Criminal Intent: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To Ex-SGPC Secretary In Missing 'Saroops' Case True Owner Cannot Unlawfully Enter Tenanted Premises Under Guise Of Ownership To Commit Offence: Kerala High Court Upholds Landlord's Conviction RTO Officials Cannot Seize Vehicles Without Specific Statutory Authority; Actions Pending Writ Proceeding Highly Improper: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Flags West Bengal Incidents, Orders Central Forces to Shield Judges on Ground Duty Two-Judge Bench Can Modify Three-Judge Bench Orders: Supreme Court Supreme Court Cancels Bail Of 'Grand Venice' Promoter, Forfeits ₹50 Crore Deposit Over Siphoning Of Funds During IBC Moratorium

“Your Officers Don’t Read Newspapers?”: Supreme Court Summons Chief Secretaries of States/UTs for Non-Compliance with ABC Rules in Stray Dog Case

27 October 2025 12:01 PM

By: sayum


"Once they are aware, they should come forward": SC lashes out over failure to file affidavits on animal birth control compliance - Today, On October 27, 2025, the Supreme Court of India, in the ongoing suo motu case titled In Re: City Hounded by Strays, Kids Pay Price, came down heavily on the non-compliance by several States and Union Territories with its earlier directions concerning the implementation of the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023.

A three-judge bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta, and Justice NV Anjaria directed that Chief Secretaries of all defaulting States and Union Territories, except West Bengal and Telangana, must personally appear before the Court on November 3, 2025, and explain their failure to file compliance affidavits.
“Notices Were Issued… Everyone Has Reported This” – Supreme Court Questions Silence of Defaulting States
The apex court, expressing displeasure, noted that only West Bengal, Telangana, and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi had submitted affidavits as directed by the Court on August 22, 2025. The rest had not filed any response, nor was there any representation on their behalf during the hearing.
Justice Vikram Nath sternly observed:
"Continuous incidents are happening and the image of the country is being shown as down in the eyes of foreign nations. We are also reading news reports... Why have your officers not acted? Your officers don’t read newspapers or social media? Everyone has reported this…"
Justice Nath further asked Additional Solicitor General Archana Pathak Dave to explain why the NCT of Delhi had failed to file a compliance affidavit, despite the matter being extensively reported and court notices being served.
"Why has NCT not filed affidavit? Chief Secretary to come up with an explanation… Otherwise, cost may be imposed and coercive steps taken... All Chief Secretaries to remain present on November 3, else we will hold the Court in the auditorium," he warned.
From Rabies Risk to Pan-India Compliance – How the Matter Evolved
The Court is monitoring the case In Re: City Hounded by Strays, Kids Pay Price, registered suo motu based on a Times of India report highlighting the increasing risk of stray dog attacks and rabies, especially among children.
On July 28, 2025, a two-judge bench led by Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan took suo motu cognizance and, on August 11, passed sweeping directions ordering authorities in Delhi, Noida, Gurugram, and Ghaziabad to pick up all stray dogs and shift them to shelters, expressly barring their release.
However, these directions triggered legal and administrative concerns, as they appeared to contradict the ABC Rules, 2023, which mandate that sterilized and vaccinated dogs must be released back to the same locality, except where the dogs are rabid, suspected to be rabid, or aggressive.
Subsequently, on August 13, the matter was reassigned to a three-judge bench headed by Justice Vikram Nath. On August 22, this bench stayed the earlier direction prohibiting release of dogs, holding:
"The direction given in the order dated 11th August, 2025, prohibiting the release of the treated and vaccinated dogs seems to be too harsh."
Invoking Rule 11(9) of the ABC Rules, the Court clarified that picked-up dogs must be released back in the same area post-treatment, unless exceptions apply. It also prohibited public feeding of stray dogs in general areas and directed the establishment of dedicated feeding zones.
Nationwide Scope and Compliance Framework Ordered by Supreme Court
Taking note of the increasing frequency of dog bite incidents, the bench expanded the scope of the case to a pan-India level. It impleaded:
•    All State and UT Governments
•    Secretaries of Animal Husbandry Departments
•    Municipal Corporations and Local Bodies
These authorities were instructed to file affidavits outlining the steps taken to implement the ABC Rules. The Court also expressed its intent to transfer similar matters pending before various High Courts to itself to evolve a uniform national policy on stray dog control.
Furthermore, it reiterated that no person or organisation may obstruct the local authorities from executing their duties under the ABC Rules.
Non-Compliance to Invite Coercive Action; Supreme Court Demands Accountability
By summoning Chief Secretaries of the defaulting jurisdictions and threatening coercive measures, the Supreme Court has signalled that non-compliance with its orders in matters affecting public safety and constitutional governance will not be tolerated.
The next hearing is scheduled for November 3, 2025, and will likely shape the roadmap for a nationwide enforcement mechanism on stray dog control in compliance with statutory and constitutional mandates.
Case Title: In Re: 'City Hounded by Strays, Kids Pay Price', SMW(C) No. 5/2025
Bench: Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta, Justice NV Anjaria
Date of Order: 27 October 2025

Latest Legal News