Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

“Your Officers Don’t Read Newspapers?”: Supreme Court Summons Chief Secretaries of States/UTs for Non-Compliance with ABC Rules in Stray Dog Case

27 October 2025 12:01 PM

By: sayum


"Once they are aware, they should come forward": SC lashes out over failure to file affidavits on animal birth control compliance - Today, On October 27, 2025, the Supreme Court of India, in the ongoing suo motu case titled In Re: City Hounded by Strays, Kids Pay Price, came down heavily on the non-compliance by several States and Union Territories with its earlier directions concerning the implementation of the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023.

A three-judge bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta, and Justice NV Anjaria directed that Chief Secretaries of all defaulting States and Union Territories, except West Bengal and Telangana, must personally appear before the Court on November 3, 2025, and explain their failure to file compliance affidavits.
“Notices Were Issued… Everyone Has Reported This” – Supreme Court Questions Silence of Defaulting States
The apex court, expressing displeasure, noted that only West Bengal, Telangana, and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi had submitted affidavits as directed by the Court on August 22, 2025. The rest had not filed any response, nor was there any representation on their behalf during the hearing.
Justice Vikram Nath sternly observed:
"Continuous incidents are happening and the image of the country is being shown as down in the eyes of foreign nations. We are also reading news reports... Why have your officers not acted? Your officers don’t read newspapers or social media? Everyone has reported this…"
Justice Nath further asked Additional Solicitor General Archana Pathak Dave to explain why the NCT of Delhi had failed to file a compliance affidavit, despite the matter being extensively reported and court notices being served.
"Why has NCT not filed affidavit? Chief Secretary to come up with an explanation… Otherwise, cost may be imposed and coercive steps taken... All Chief Secretaries to remain present on November 3, else we will hold the Court in the auditorium," he warned.
From Rabies Risk to Pan-India Compliance – How the Matter Evolved
The Court is monitoring the case In Re: City Hounded by Strays, Kids Pay Price, registered suo motu based on a Times of India report highlighting the increasing risk of stray dog attacks and rabies, especially among children.
On July 28, 2025, a two-judge bench led by Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan took suo motu cognizance and, on August 11, passed sweeping directions ordering authorities in Delhi, Noida, Gurugram, and Ghaziabad to pick up all stray dogs and shift them to shelters, expressly barring their release.
However, these directions triggered legal and administrative concerns, as they appeared to contradict the ABC Rules, 2023, which mandate that sterilized and vaccinated dogs must be released back to the same locality, except where the dogs are rabid, suspected to be rabid, or aggressive.
Subsequently, on August 13, the matter was reassigned to a three-judge bench headed by Justice Vikram Nath. On August 22, this bench stayed the earlier direction prohibiting release of dogs, holding:
"The direction given in the order dated 11th August, 2025, prohibiting the release of the treated and vaccinated dogs seems to be too harsh."
Invoking Rule 11(9) of the ABC Rules, the Court clarified that picked-up dogs must be released back in the same area post-treatment, unless exceptions apply. It also prohibited public feeding of stray dogs in general areas and directed the establishment of dedicated feeding zones.
Nationwide Scope and Compliance Framework Ordered by Supreme Court
Taking note of the increasing frequency of dog bite incidents, the bench expanded the scope of the case to a pan-India level. It impleaded:
•    All State and UT Governments
•    Secretaries of Animal Husbandry Departments
•    Municipal Corporations and Local Bodies
These authorities were instructed to file affidavits outlining the steps taken to implement the ABC Rules. The Court also expressed its intent to transfer similar matters pending before various High Courts to itself to evolve a uniform national policy on stray dog control.
Furthermore, it reiterated that no person or organisation may obstruct the local authorities from executing their duties under the ABC Rules.
Non-Compliance to Invite Coercive Action; Supreme Court Demands Accountability
By summoning Chief Secretaries of the defaulting jurisdictions and threatening coercive measures, the Supreme Court has signalled that non-compliance with its orders in matters affecting public safety and constitutional governance will not be tolerated.
The next hearing is scheduled for November 3, 2025, and will likely shape the roadmap for a nationwide enforcement mechanism on stray dog control in compliance with statutory and constitutional mandates.
Case Title: In Re: 'City Hounded by Strays, Kids Pay Price', SMW(C) No. 5/2025
Bench: Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta, Justice NV Anjaria
Date of Order: 27 October 2025

Latest Legal News