Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

WIFE MURDERED HUSBAND - MODIFIES CONVICTION FROM MUREDER TO CULPABLE HOMIVIDE – Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on June 26, 2023, the Delhi High Court addressed the case of an appellant suffering from psychosis and highlighted the state's duty to care for mentally ill prisoners. The judgment modified the appellant's convictioan and emphasized the need for proper medical treatment and support for individuals with mental illnesses.

Bench Stated, "Even though the mental illness of the appellant was not such that she can take the defense of insanity, it certainly falls under Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC." The court recognized that the appellant, diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, was on treatment for psychosis since 1996, indicating a milder form of schizophrenia. The presence of psychosis during the alleged offense led to a loss of self-control even with slight provocation. Consequently, the court modified the appellant's conviction from Section 302 IPC (murder) to Section 304(1) IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder).

The judgment shed light on the state's responsibility for the care of mentally ill prisoners. Referring to a previous case, the court emphasized that the state must continue to look after mentally unstable individuals, even after their release from judicial custody. It highlighted the duty to provide adequate medical treatment, counseling, and rehabilitation services, particularly for those who do not require regular hospitalization and lack suitable living arrangements. The court called for the establishment of Short Stay Homes and Long Stay Homes to ensure a safe and conducive environment for individuals with mental illnesses.

The judgment also addressed the period of judicial custody undergone by the appellant. Considering the time spent at the Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences (IHBAS) as part of judicial custody, the court determined that the appellant had already undergone a significant period of imprisonment. Furthermore, it emphasized that the state must continue to bear the expenses of necessary treatment and the appellant's stay in a suitable facility.

This judgment serves as a significant step towards recognizing the rights and needs of mentally ill prisoners within the criminal justice system. It highlights the importance of proper care, support, and rehabilitation for individuals with mental illnesses, ensuring their well-being and dignified treatment.

Date of Judgment: June 26, 2023           

MADHU BALA  vs STATE 

Latest Legal News