Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

WIFE MURDERED HUSBAND - MODIFIES CONVICTION FROM MUREDER TO CULPABLE HOMIVIDE – Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on June 26, 2023, the Delhi High Court addressed the case of an appellant suffering from psychosis and highlighted the state's duty to care for mentally ill prisoners. The judgment modified the appellant's convictioan and emphasized the need for proper medical treatment and support for individuals with mental illnesses.

Bench Stated, "Even though the mental illness of the appellant was not such that she can take the defense of insanity, it certainly falls under Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC." The court recognized that the appellant, diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, was on treatment for psychosis since 1996, indicating a milder form of schizophrenia. The presence of psychosis during the alleged offense led to a loss of self-control even with slight provocation. Consequently, the court modified the appellant's conviction from Section 302 IPC (murder) to Section 304(1) IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder).

The judgment shed light on the state's responsibility for the care of mentally ill prisoners. Referring to a previous case, the court emphasized that the state must continue to look after mentally unstable individuals, even after their release from judicial custody. It highlighted the duty to provide adequate medical treatment, counseling, and rehabilitation services, particularly for those who do not require regular hospitalization and lack suitable living arrangements. The court called for the establishment of Short Stay Homes and Long Stay Homes to ensure a safe and conducive environment for individuals with mental illnesses.

The judgment also addressed the period of judicial custody undergone by the appellant. Considering the time spent at the Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences (IHBAS) as part of judicial custody, the court determined that the appellant had already undergone a significant period of imprisonment. Furthermore, it emphasized that the state must continue to bear the expenses of necessary treatment and the appellant's stay in a suitable facility.

This judgment serves as a significant step towards recognizing the rights and needs of mentally ill prisoners within the criminal justice system. It highlights the importance of proper care, support, and rehabilitation for individuals with mental illnesses, ensuring their well-being and dignified treatment.

Date of Judgment: June 26, 2023           

MADHU BALA  vs STATE 

Latest Legal News