Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

WIFE MURDERED HUSBAND - MODIFIES CONVICTION FROM MUREDER TO CULPABLE HOMIVIDE – Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment delivered on June 26, 2023, the Delhi High Court addressed the case of an appellant suffering from psychosis and highlighted the state's duty to care for mentally ill prisoners. The judgment modified the appellant's convictioan and emphasized the need for proper medical treatment and support for individuals with mental illnesses.

Bench Stated, "Even though the mental illness of the appellant was not such that she can take the defense of insanity, it certainly falls under Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC." The court recognized that the appellant, diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, was on treatment for psychosis since 1996, indicating a milder form of schizophrenia. The presence of psychosis during the alleged offense led to a loss of self-control even with slight provocation. Consequently, the court modified the appellant's conviction from Section 302 IPC (murder) to Section 304(1) IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder).

The judgment shed light on the state's responsibility for the care of mentally ill prisoners. Referring to a previous case, the court emphasized that the state must continue to look after mentally unstable individuals, even after their release from judicial custody. It highlighted the duty to provide adequate medical treatment, counseling, and rehabilitation services, particularly for those who do not require regular hospitalization and lack suitable living arrangements. The court called for the establishment of Short Stay Homes and Long Stay Homes to ensure a safe and conducive environment for individuals with mental illnesses.

The judgment also addressed the period of judicial custody undergone by the appellant. Considering the time spent at the Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences (IHBAS) as part of judicial custody, the court determined that the appellant had already undergone a significant period of imprisonment. Furthermore, it emphasized that the state must continue to bear the expenses of necessary treatment and the appellant's stay in a suitable facility.

This judgment serves as a significant step towards recognizing the rights and needs of mentally ill prisoners within the criminal justice system. It highlights the importance of proper care, support, and rehabilitation for individuals with mental illnesses, ensuring their well-being and dignified treatment.

Date of Judgment: June 26, 2023           

MADHU BALA  vs STATE 

Latest Legal News