Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Widow Entitled to Recover Maintenance Arrears from Deceased Husband's Assets, But Not Interest on Arrears: Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, upheld the widow's right to recover maintenance arrears from her deceased husband's assets, yet set aside the interest awarded on these arrears. This ruling came as a response to a criminal revision petition challenging the appellate court's decision regarding the recovery of arrears of interim maintenance.

Legal Point: The core legal issue revolved around whether a widow is entitled to recover arrears of maintenance from her deceased husband's estate, including service benefits, under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court upheld this entitlement but overturned the decision to award interest on the arrears.

Background and Issues: The petitioner sought recovery of maintenance amounting to Rs. 7,05,600, with interest, due from 2009 to 2014 as per a maintenance order in a previous case. The trial court dismissed this enforcement against the deceased husband, but the appellate court allowed recovery from his assets, including service benefits. The husband's mother, respondent No.3, contested this, leading to the current revision petition.

Enforcement against Deceased's Estate: The High Court reaffirmed the widow's right to recover maintenance arrears from her late husband's assets, citing the determined maintenance amount as a rightful claim.

Legitimacy of Claim: The court rejected the argument that the maintenance claim was invalid due to a compromise or a closed case, emphasizing that the petitioner never relinquished her right to the arrears.

No Order Against Dead Person: Addressing the respondent's contention, the court clarified that the enforcement was against the deceased's assets, not against him personally.

Interest on Arrears: The court set aside the 12% interest on maintenance arrears awarded by the appellate court. It considered the financial position and circumstances of the elderly mother-in-law, who hadn't received any service benefits, and deemed the interest legally unsustainable.

Final Decision: The High Court partially allowed the revision petition. It confirmed the widow's entitlement to maintenance arrears but set aside the grant of interest on these arrears. The judgment and order of the first appellate court were modified accordingly.

Date of Decision: 2nd April 2024

Smt. Sudhabai vs. Smt. Rashmi V. Rao

Latest Legal News