Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Violating Arnesh Kumar's guidelines for jailed in Four police officers: Telangana HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Four police officers, including an IPS officer, were sentenced to four weeks in prison for contempt of court on Monday by the Telangana High Court.

The Bench of Justice G Radha Rani issued the order after determining that the defendants had willfully disregarded the Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar guidelines.

According to the court, the transgressors violated the Supreme Court's guidelines for issuing a notice of appearance under section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code to the accused within two weeks of the case filing date.

The court also ordered the state government and police commissioner to initiate disciplinary action against those who violated the Arnesh Kumar guidelines.

In this case, the petitioner approached the High Court and argued that the police issued a Look Out Circular against them and also sought non-bailable warrants against them without providing notice under section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code, which violates Supreme Court guidelines.

In addition, the petitioner claimed that in a case involving cruelty under the Dowry Prohibition Act, NBWs were fraudulently procured and she was humiliated.

In this context, the petitioner urged the court to punish the negligent police officers.

As a violation of Apex Court guidelines, issuing a LOC or NBW without notifying the petitioner is a violation of the court's initial ruling.

Therefore, the court sentenced the violators to four weeks in prison and a Rs 2,000 fine each.

However, the court suspended the sentence for six weeks to allow the violators time to file an appeal.

D.D: 06 JUNE 2022

Jakka Vinod Kumar Reddy  v/s  AR Srinivas

Latest Legal News