CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Violating Arnesh Kumar's guidelines for jailed in Four police officers: Telangana HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Four police officers, including an IPS officer, were sentenced to four weeks in prison for contempt of court on Monday by the Telangana High Court.

The Bench of Justice G Radha Rani issued the order after determining that the defendants had willfully disregarded the Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar guidelines.

According to the court, the transgressors violated the Supreme Court's guidelines for issuing a notice of appearance under section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code to the accused within two weeks of the case filing date.

The court also ordered the state government and police commissioner to initiate disciplinary action against those who violated the Arnesh Kumar guidelines.

In this case, the petitioner approached the High Court and argued that the police issued a Look Out Circular against them and also sought non-bailable warrants against them without providing notice under section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code, which violates Supreme Court guidelines.

In addition, the petitioner claimed that in a case involving cruelty under the Dowry Prohibition Act, NBWs were fraudulently procured and she was humiliated.

In this context, the petitioner urged the court to punish the negligent police officers.

As a violation of Apex Court guidelines, issuing a LOC or NBW without notifying the petitioner is a violation of the court's initial ruling.

Therefore, the court sentenced the violators to four weeks in prison and a Rs 2,000 fine each.

However, the court suspended the sentence for six weeks to allow the violators time to file an appeal.

D.D: 06 JUNE 2022

Jakka Vinod Kumar Reddy  v/s  AR Srinivas

Latest Legal News