SARFAESI Act | Sale Certificate Cannot Be Issued In Favour Of A Third-Party Nominee Who Was Not The Auction Bidder: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Auction Sale Conducted In Violation Of Mandatory Rules And Subsisting Restraint Order Is Vitiated In Law: Supreme Court Recovery Of Alleged Overpayment From A Separate, Unrelated Contract Without Notice Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Supreme Court IBC | Adjudicating Authority Has Power To Recall CIRP Admission Order If It Was Obtained Through Fraud Or Collusion: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act | Presumption Of Service Is Attracted Once Notice Is Dispatched To Correct Address Of Drawer: Supreme Court Operation Of Hookah Bars In Restaurants Constitutes Violation Of Rule 4(3) Of COTPA Rules: Allahabad High Court High Court Cannot Recall Order Passed On Merits Even If Passed Ex-Parte: Bombay High Court Administrative Authorities Cannot Pass Orders Having Civil Consequences Without Meaningful Consideration Of The Affected Employee’s Response: Allahabad High Court Discharge Application Cannot Be Converted Into A 'Mini-Trial' To Assess Evidentiary Sufficiency: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Allegations Are Falsified By Documents Annexed To Plaint Or Based On Non-Existent Law: Bombay High Court Police Cannot Interfere In Pending Civil Disputes Or Act As Arbitrators In Private Property Conflicts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Contract For Personal Services Between Doctor And Hospital Is Determinable And Not Specifically Enforceable: Calcutta High Court Allegations Of Sexual Offences Cannot Be Quashed Based On Contradictory Evidence Requiring Mini-Trial: Delhi High Court PMLA Adjudication | Failure To Expressly Discuss Every Submission In Written Synopsis Does Not Vitiate Order Under Principles Of Natural Justice: Karnataka High Court Prolonged Separation Of Sixteen Years Constitutes Cruelty Under Special Marriage Act: Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Violating Arnesh Kumar's guidelines for jailed in Four police officers: Telangana HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Four police officers, including an IPS officer, were sentenced to four weeks in prison for contempt of court on Monday by the Telangana High Court.

The Bench of Justice G Radha Rani issued the order after determining that the defendants had willfully disregarded the Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar guidelines.

According to the court, the transgressors violated the Supreme Court's guidelines for issuing a notice of appearance under section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code to the accused within two weeks of the case filing date.

The court also ordered the state government and police commissioner to initiate disciplinary action against those who violated the Arnesh Kumar guidelines.

In this case, the petitioner approached the High Court and argued that the police issued a Look Out Circular against them and also sought non-bailable warrants against them without providing notice under section 41A of the Criminal Procedure Code, which violates Supreme Court guidelines.

In addition, the petitioner claimed that in a case involving cruelty under the Dowry Prohibition Act, NBWs were fraudulently procured and she was humiliated.

In this context, the petitioner urged the court to punish the negligent police officers.

As a violation of Apex Court guidelines, issuing a LOC or NBW without notifying the petitioner is a violation of the court's initial ruling.

Therefore, the court sentenced the violators to four weeks in prison and a Rs 2,000 fine each.

However, the court suspended the sentence for six weeks to allow the violators time to file an appeal.

D.D: 06 JUNE 2022

Jakka Vinod Kumar Reddy  v/s  AR Srinivas

Latest Legal News