MV Act | Blanket Ban on Bike Taxis Unconstitutional; Motorcycles are ‘Contract Carriages’: Karnataka High Court Labourer Travelling in Tractor-Trolley for Agricultural Work Not a Gratuitous Passenger – Insurer Liable: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Appeal of Oriental Insurance Wife Cannot Claim Maintenance After Her Own Family Cripples Husband’s Earning Capacity: Allahabad High Court FIR is Not an Encyclopedia, Abusive Conduct Deserves Scrutiny: Karnataka High Court Declines to Quash FIR Against Former Politician Over Alleged Abuse of Woman Officer Kendriya Vidyalaya Parent Associations Can't Occupy School Premises or Run Buses Without Compliance With KVS Education Code: Kerala High Court Landowners Under Highway Act Cannot Be Left Remediless: Supreme Court Restores Arbitral Challenges Withdrawn Due to Unconstitutional Ruling Probation Does Not Erase Conviction: Misconduct Remains Misconduct: Supreme Court Rejects Shielding Dismissed Employee Despite Probation Rigid Procedural Compliance Can’t Override Substantial Justice: Supreme Court Restores Appeal Dismissed for Technical Lapse Consent of Minor is No Consent in the Eye of Law: Allahabad High Court Declines to Quash Rape Case Once Impleaded, Insurer Can Challenge Compensation On All Grounds: Supreme Court Restores Insurance Company’s Right to Contest Quantum in Motor Accident Case Where Dispute is Personal and Peace is Restored, Law Must Not Be Dragged Further: Supreme Court Quashes FIR in Neighbourhood Quarrel CBI Not The Only Gatekeeper Of Corruption Probes Against Central Employees: Supreme Court Affirms Power Of State ACBs Dismissal of JCO Automatically Forfeits Pension — No Separate Order Required: Supreme Court Satisfaction of Detaining Authority Must Be Based on Cogent Material; Mere Ipse Dixit Can't Sustain Detention: Supreme Court Intention to Humiliate on Account of Caste Is Essential Under SCST Act: Supreme Court Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory Under PC Act: Supreme Court Upholds Lokayukta's Power Status Quo Ante Is a Mandatory Direction, Cannot Be Granted Lightly Without Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Interim Order Presumption Under Section 113-B Evidence Act Not Attracted Without Proof Of Cruelty Soon Before Death: Bombay High Court Affirms Acquittal

Vietnamese Political Activist Tran Van Bang Sentenced to 8 Years in Prison for "Spreading Anti-Government Propaganda"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Vietnamese Political Activist Tran Van Bang Sentenced to 8 Years in Prison for "Spreading Anti-Government P

Human Rights Watch Calls for Dropping Charges Against Tran Van Bang as Vietnamese Activist Receives 8-Year Sentence

In a recent development, state-owned Tuoitre newspaper and other Vietnamese media outlets have reported that Tran Van Bang, a political activist, has been sentenced to eight years in prison with an additional three years of probation by the People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City. The charges against him include "spreading anti-government propaganda." This verdict comes shortly after Human Rights Watch (HRW) issued a plea urging Vietnamese authorities to drop all charges against Tran Van Bang.

Tran Van Bang was found guilty by the court of "making, storing, distributing, or propagating information, documents, and materials" aimed at opposing the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. According to the allegations, he utilized three Facebook accounts to publish a total of 39 articles criticizing the Vietnamese Government, including advocating for a boycott of the election of Vietnamese National Assembly deputies. The arrest of Tran Van Bang took place on March 1, 2022, by the Ho Chi Minh City police, and he was charged under article 117 of the Criminal Code for expressing critical views about the government.

Shortly before the court's sentencing, HRW called upon Vietnamese authorities to immediately dismiss all charges against Tran Van Bang and secure his release. HRW Deputy Asia Director, Phil Robertson, strongly criticized the actions of Vietnamese authorities, emphasizing that arresting, detaining, and prosecuting individuals for expressing dissenting views about the government on the internet highlights weakness rather than strength. Robertson emphasized that Tran Van Bang should not face punishment merely for exercising the fundamental right to freedom of expression.

Tran Van Bang's sentence echoes another recent case involving Vietnamese journalist and activist Nguyen Lan Thang, who received a similarly lengthy prison term of six years for his work in reporting human rights violations in the region. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the Committee to Protect Journalists have also called upon Vietnamese authorities to immediately and unconditionally release Nguyen and drop all pending charges against him.

Latest Legal News