Injured Wife Is Sterling Witness — Her Identification Of Husband As Assailant Needs No Corroboration: Allahabad High Court Four Years in Custody, 359 Witnesses Pending, Trial Could Take Decades: Delhi HC Grants Bail to UAPA Accused Charged as "Hybrid Cadres" Prosecution's Fatal Mistake: Not Examining the Only Child Witness Who Saw the Accused — Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused Co-sharers Entitled To Same Land Compensation As Other Owners Even If No Reference Filed Under Section 18 Or 28-A: Punjab & Haryana HC PIL Filed To Settle Personal Scores Cannot Hide Behind Public Interest: Rajasthan High Court Bars Petitioner From Filing Any PIL In Future Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Special NIA Court's Refusal To Discharge, Remedy Lies In Statutory Appeal: Allahabad High Court Rs. 57,000 Per Acre Award Inadequate for Fertile Commercial Land: AP High Court Enhances Compensation to Rs. 3.50 Lakh, Raises Tree Values Election Petition Must Plead Material Facts, Not Mere Allegations: Bombay High Court Rejects Challenge To Chandivali MLA’s Election Son Of Deceased Tenant Cannot Claim Statutory Protection Beyond 5 Years Under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act: Calcutta High Court Daughter Cannot Claim Mewar Estate Through Intestacy Petition While Disputing Will: Delhi High Court Dismisses Padmaja Kumari Parmar's Petition in Mewar Royal Family Succession Battle Cabinet Cannot Spend First and Seek Sanction Later: Kerala High Court Halts ₹20 Crore ‘Nava Keralam’ Programme Incorporation Under the Companies Act Does Not Confer Immunity Against an Action in Passing Off: Madras HC POCSO | School Records Prevail Over Ossification Test For Age Determination Of Minor Victim: Madhya Pradesh High Court A Buyer Who Runs Away From the Tehsil Without Paying Cannot Later Sue to Register the Sale Deed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Encroacher Cannot Claim Forest Rights by Calling Himself a Traditional Dweller: Madras High Court LIC Agent Certified Cancer Patient's Health As 'Good' Without Meeting Him: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Termination Property Bought From Crime Proceeds Before PMLA Came Into Force Can Still Be Attached If Possessed After: Delhi High Court Overturns Single Judge Co-Employee Cannot Play Watchdog Over Colleague's Dismissal Order — Allahabad High Court Shuts the Door on Third-Party Service Appeals

Vietnamese Political Activist Tran Van Bang Sentenced to 8 Years in Prison for "Spreading Anti-Government Propaganda"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Vietnamese Political Activist Tran Van Bang Sentenced to 8 Years in Prison for "Spreading Anti-Government P

Human Rights Watch Calls for Dropping Charges Against Tran Van Bang as Vietnamese Activist Receives 8-Year Sentence

In a recent development, state-owned Tuoitre newspaper and other Vietnamese media outlets have reported that Tran Van Bang, a political activist, has been sentenced to eight years in prison with an additional three years of probation by the People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City. The charges against him include "spreading anti-government propaganda." This verdict comes shortly after Human Rights Watch (HRW) issued a plea urging Vietnamese authorities to drop all charges against Tran Van Bang.

Tran Van Bang was found guilty by the court of "making, storing, distributing, or propagating information, documents, and materials" aimed at opposing the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. According to the allegations, he utilized three Facebook accounts to publish a total of 39 articles criticizing the Vietnamese Government, including advocating for a boycott of the election of Vietnamese National Assembly deputies. The arrest of Tran Van Bang took place on March 1, 2022, by the Ho Chi Minh City police, and he was charged under article 117 of the Criminal Code for expressing critical views about the government.

Shortly before the court's sentencing, HRW called upon Vietnamese authorities to immediately dismiss all charges against Tran Van Bang and secure his release. HRW Deputy Asia Director, Phil Robertson, strongly criticized the actions of Vietnamese authorities, emphasizing that arresting, detaining, and prosecuting individuals for expressing dissenting views about the government on the internet highlights weakness rather than strength. Robertson emphasized that Tran Van Bang should not face punishment merely for exercising the fundamental right to freedom of expression.

Tran Van Bang's sentence echoes another recent case involving Vietnamese journalist and activist Nguyen Lan Thang, who received a similarly lengthy prison term of six years for his work in reporting human rights violations in the region. Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the Committee to Protect Journalists have also called upon Vietnamese authorities to immediately and unconditionally release Nguyen and drop all pending charges against him.

Latest Legal News