CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Germany filed complaint against Italy - ICJ

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In its current action, Germany alleges that Italian domestic courts have considered a considerable number of new claims against Germany in violation of Germany's sovereign immunity, despite a 2012 ICJ judgement granting the country legal immunity.

In a long-running dispute over World War II reparations, Germany has filed a complaint against Italy at the United Nations' highest court.

Friday evening, the International Court of Justice revealed the filing.

The German case refers to a 2012 judgement by the UN court that confirmed Germany's immunity from being sued by victims of Nazi atrocities in foreign courts.

In 2008, the Italian supreme court ruled that an Italian civilian was entitled to reparations for his deportation to Germany in 1944 to labour as a slave.

In its current complaint, Germany contends that Italian domestic courts have heard a substantial number of new claims against Germany in violation of its sovereign immunity since 2012.

In the case it won in 2012, Berlin contended that the Italian supreme court's verdict cast doubt on a post-Nazi restitution system that has seen Germany pay tens of billions of dollars in reparations since the 1950s.

Italy has breached and continues to violate its commitment to respect Germany's sovereign immunity by permitting civil claims to be launched against Germany in connection with Nazi war crimes and by intending to sell off four German-owned properties in Rome.

The case also seeks urgent directives from the court, known as temporary measures, including an order to ensure that the German properties "are not subjected to a public auction" or "additional measures of constraint" until the court reaches its ultimate ruling, which will likely take years.

Hearing dates were not immediately established. International Court of Justice decisions are final and legally binding.

D.D :- 10 May 2022

GERMANY Vs ITALY

Latest Legal News