Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Germany filed complaint against Italy - ICJ

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In its current action, Germany alleges that Italian domestic courts have considered a considerable number of new claims against Germany in violation of Germany's sovereign immunity, despite a 2012 ICJ judgement granting the country legal immunity.

In a long-running dispute over World War II reparations, Germany has filed a complaint against Italy at the United Nations' highest court.

Friday evening, the International Court of Justice revealed the filing.

The German case refers to a 2012 judgement by the UN court that confirmed Germany's immunity from being sued by victims of Nazi atrocities in foreign courts.

In 2008, the Italian supreme court ruled that an Italian civilian was entitled to reparations for his deportation to Germany in 1944 to labour as a slave.

In its current complaint, Germany contends that Italian domestic courts have heard a substantial number of new claims against Germany in violation of its sovereign immunity since 2012.

In the case it won in 2012, Berlin contended that the Italian supreme court's verdict cast doubt on a post-Nazi restitution system that has seen Germany pay tens of billions of dollars in reparations since the 1950s.

Italy has breached and continues to violate its commitment to respect Germany's sovereign immunity by permitting civil claims to be launched against Germany in connection with Nazi war crimes and by intending to sell off four German-owned properties in Rome.

The case also seeks urgent directives from the court, known as temporary measures, including an order to ensure that the German properties "are not subjected to a public auction" or "additional measures of constraint" until the court reaches its ultimate ruling, which will likely take years.

Hearing dates were not immediately established. International Court of Justice decisions are final and legally binding.

D.D :- 10 May 2022

GERMANY Vs ITALY

Latest Legal News