MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

“Vehicles Parked Near Unauthorised Dhabas Causing Fatal Accidents on Highways Must Be Regulated”: Supreme Court Initiates Suo Motu Action in Wake of Rajasthan and Telangana Tragedies

10 November 2025 3:06 PM

By: sayum


“People stop their trucks and go to the dhabas. And the other vehicles coming on speed collide with them. We have to understand how this can be regulated,” remarked Justice JK Maheshwari while directing NHAI and MoRTH to conduct a detailed survey on dhabas and road conditions. In a suo motu public interest intervention following deadly highway accidents in Rajasthan and Telangana, the Supreme Court of India on November 10, 2025, issued comprehensive directions to the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH). The Bench comprising Justice JK Maheshwari and Justice Vijay Bishnoi sought detailed reports on the presence of roadside dhabas and the maintenance standards of national highways, particularly in relation to the stretches where the fatal accidents occurred.

This extraordinary judicial intervention came in the wake of two tragic incidents — the Phalodi accident in Rajasthan, which claimed at least 18 lives, and a similar accident in Telangana, where 19 people perished — both reportedly involving stationary vehicles near unauthorised roadside eateries (dhabas).

“Unauthorised Dhabas Are Contributing to Road Fatalities”: SC Orders Immediate Survey of Highway Eateries

The Bench expressed deep concern over the practice of setting up dhabas on land not notified or permitted for commercial use along highways, leading to vehicles being parked dangerously close to high-speed lanes.

In a strongly worded observation, the Court stated:
“Dhabas have been opened by the general public on areas which are not available for them to open dhabas. In consequence, the vehicles go and park there. The other vehicles are not in a position to see the standing vehicles on the road, colliding with such vehicles.”

To address this situation, the Court ordered:
“A survey be carried out within two weeks to identify how many dhabas are located along the highways on land not notified for such facilities.”

Court Seeks Reports on Road Conditions, Maintenance Norms, and Toll Collection Practices

Apart from focusing on unauthorised dhabas, the Supreme Court also directed the NHAI and MoRTH to submit reports regarding the condition of the roads involved in the accidents and to clarify whether contractors entrusted with highway maintenance are adhering to prescribed norms.

The Court’s concern stemmed from media reports attributing these fatal accidents to poor road infrastructure, despite the existence of toll collection booths, indicating a possible breach of maintenance obligations by contractors.

MHA and Chief Secretaries of Affected States Made Parties to the Case

Recognising the larger implications of these recurring accidents on national highways, the Court ordered that the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) be added as a respondent in the suo motu proceedings. It also directed the Chief Secretaries of all States through which the relevant highways pass to be impleaded.

This multi-party involvement reflects the Court’s intent to bring together all stakeholders to ensure the safety and regulation of national highways, particularly in view of increasing fatalities caused by infrastructure lapses and regulatory failures.

“Trucks Parked Outside Dhabas Are a Death Trap on Speed Corridors”: Justice Maheshwari

During the hearing, Justice Maheshwari expressed serious concern about trucks being parked along the edges of highways due to the proximity of eateries, thereby creating high-risk zones on roads meant for fast-moving vehicles.

“People stop their trucks and go to the dhabas. And the other vehicles coming on speed collide with them. We have to understand how this can be regulated,” the judge remarked, highlighting the need for better zoning, traffic planning, and enforcement.

Fatal Accidents Prompt Suo Motu Action

The Bench took cognizance of two high-profile fatal accidents:

  • In the Phalodi accident in Rajasthan on November 2, a tempo traveller carrying pilgrims from Jodhpur to Bikaner collided with a stationary truck parked near a roadside eatery on the Bharatmala highway, resulting in at least 15 deaths.
  • A similar pattern was observed in an accident in Telangana, where 19 people lost their lives, again involving a parked vehicle near an unauthorised dhaba.

The Court noted that despite tolls being collected, road conditions remained poor, and enforcement around roadside commercial activity was evidently lacking.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court's suo motu action brings into sharp focus the unregulated growth of roadside establishments, the failure to enforce zoning laws, and poor highway maintenance, all contributing to rising deaths on Indian roads. The order mandates swift action by central and state authorities, setting a two-week deadline for surveys and demanding accountability from multiple governmental bodies. This intervention may pave the way for stronger regulatory frameworks governing highway infrastructure and road safety in India.

Date of Order: November 10, 2025
Case Title: In Re: Phalodi Accident
Case No.: SMW(C) No. 9/2025

Latest Legal News