Owner Can Avoid Confiscation Under NDPS by Proving Lack of Knowledge or Connivance in Illicit Use of Vehicle: Supreme Court Court is Expert of Experts: High Court Upholds Right to Rebuttal Evidence in Will Dispute Exceptional Circumstances Warrant Use of Inherent Powers to Reduce Sentences in Non-Compoundable Offenses: Supreme Court Execution of Eviction Decree Limited to Suit Premises; Additional Claims Not Permissible: Bombay High Court Only Apprentices Under the 1961 Act Are Excluded from Gratuity – Calcutta High Court Demand for Penalty and Interest Without Following Natural Justice Violates Section 11A of the Central Excise Act: P&H High Court Rajasthan High Court Acquits Bank Manager, Citing "Processing Fee, Not Bribe" in Corruption Case Compensatory Nature of Section 138 NI Act Permits Compounding Even at Revisional Stage: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 99 Crore: Faults Adjudicating Authority for Contradictory Findings Section 138 NI Act | Compounding Permitted Even at Revisional Stage with Reduced Fee in Special Circumstances: HP High Court No Renewal, Only Re-Tendering’ – Upholds Railway Board’s MPS License Policy: Delhi High Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes Second FIR Against Former Minister in Corruption Case Nature of Suit Must Be Determined on Evidence, Not Technical Grounds: Delhi High Court on Rejection of Plaint Economic Offences Must Be Scrutinized to Protect Public Interest:  Allahabad High Court Dismisses Plea to Quash FIR Against Cloud Investment Scheme Company Golden Hour Care Is a Matter of Right, Not Privilege: Supreme Court on Road Accident Victim Treatment Limitation Law | When Once the Time Has Begun to Run, Nothing Stops It: Supreme Court Section 14 of Limitation Act Shields Bona Fide Claimants: SC Validates Arbitration Amid Procedural Delay Time Lost Cannot Be Restored, But Justice Can: Supreme Court Orders Immediate Release of Convict Declared Juvenile Bailable Warrants in Domestic Violence Cases Only in Exceptional Circumstances - Domestic Violence Act Cases Are Primarily Remedial, Not Punitive: Supreme Court

"Valid LMV License Suffices for Transport Vehicles" – Madhya Pradesh High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision in ICICI Lombard Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Madhya Pradesh High Court (Gwalior Bench) affirmed the validity of a Light Motor Vehicle (LMV) license for driving transport vehicles, setting a precedent that aligns with the Apex Court's decision in the Mukund Dewangan case. The judgment was delivered by Justice Sunita Yadav in the appeal case filed by ICICI Lombard Motor Insurance Co. Ltd. against the award dated July 22, 2009, by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gwalior.

The dispute centered around a compensation claim following the death of Sonu @ Shankar Pratap Singh Jadoun in a road traffic accident. The deceased's family had filed a claim against the driver and owner of the offending vehicle, and the insurance company. The insurance company challenged the claim, arguing that the driver's license was not valid for the vehicle type involved in the accident.

Justice Sunita Yadav, in her ruling, referenced the Supreme Court's verdict in Mukund Dewangan vs. Oriental Company Limited, stating, "if a driver is holding a license to drive a light motor vehicle, he can drive a transport vehicle of such class without any endorsement to that effect." This observation underlines a significant clarification in the interpretation of motor vehicle licensing laws.

The court also deliberated on the compensation amount. It was contested by the insurance company on the grounds of incorrect dependency calculation, as the deceased was unmarried. The court upheld the Claims Tribunal's decision, agreeing that the dependency should be calculated at 1/2, citing the Sarla Verma Vs. DTC case as precedent.

The final compensation, which initially stood at Rs. 1,96,912, was enhanced to Rs. 2,86,412, following the court's assessment of the annual income of the deceased, medical expenses incurred, and prospects of future income.

This decision marks a significant moment in the interpretation of motor vehicle and insurance laws, potentially impacting numerous cases involving similar circumstances. The High Court's ruling provides clarity on the scope of valid driving licenses, particularly concerning transport vehicles, and sets a benchmark for future compensation claims in road traffic accidents.

Date of Decided on: 21-03-2024

ICICI LOMBARD MOTOR INSURANCE CO. LTD. Vs. GOPAL SINGH AND OTHERS

Similar News