Mere Unwanted Staring At A Woman's Chest In Office Does Not Constitute Voyeurism Under Section 354-C IPC: Bombay High Court State Cannot Justify Espionage FIR Based Solely On Custodial Disclosure Without Corroborative Evidence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail Mere Issuance Of Letter Of Intent Without Formal Work Order Does Not Create Concluded Contract Or Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court Executing Court Cannot Modify Terms Of Compromise Decree Merely Because Implementation Is Impracticable: Supreme Court Adjudicating Authority Only Needs To Check For 'Plausible' Pre-Existing Dispute Under Section 9 IBC, Not Its Success On Merits: Supreme Court Arguing Against Settled Law To Show Skill Wastes Court Time; Giving Up Such Arguments A Professional Virtue: Supreme Court Limitation Under Section 468 CrPC Is Computed From Date Of Filing Complaint, Not Date Of Cognizance: Supreme Court MSCS Act | Co-operative Society Can't Acquire Corporate Debtor Under IBC If Not In 'Same Line Of Business' As Per Its Bye-Laws: Supreme Court Multi-State Co-op Societies Can Only Invest In Entities With Substantially Similar Core Business Under Bye-Laws: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Usurp Governor's Statutory Discretion To Grant Extraordinary Pension Under 1981 Rules: Supreme Court Litigants Can Challenge Non-Appealable Interlocutory Orders In Final Appeal Under Section 105 CPC: Supreme Court Plaintiff Cannot File Fresh Suit For Title If Relief Was Omitted In Earlier Injunction Suit Arising From Same Dispute: Supreme Court Plaintiff's Failure To Enter Witness Box Draws Rebuttable Presumption, Not Fatal To Suit If Rebutted By Cogent Evidence: Supreme Court Sale Deeds Executed During Pendency Of Specific Performance Suit Hit By Doctrine Of Lis Pendens: Supreme Court EWS Certificates Must Relate To Correct Financial Year; Courts Should Not Routinely Interfere In Online Recruitment Rejections: Supreme Court Court Can Lift 'Veil Of Partnership' To Evict Tenants Using Reconstitution As Cloak For Unlawful Sub-Letting: Supreme Court State Cannot Fix Lower Dearness Relief Rate For Pensioners Than Dearness Allowance For Serving Employees: Supreme Court Prolonged Separation Indicates Matrimonial Bond Broken Beyond Repair: Supreme Court Upholds Divorce Over Wife's Cruelty Right To Contest Elections Distinct From Right To Vote, Co-Operative Societies Can Set Threshold Eligibility Conditions: Supreme Court Court Can Draw Adverse Inference Against Party Withholding Best Evidence, Has No Duty To Seek Production: Supreme Court Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court

Unreliable Witness Testimony and Unsubstantiated Motive. Inherent Flaws in Prosecution's Version Led to Acquittal: Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Supreme Court in a landmark judgement reversed the convictions by the Sessions Court and High Court, highlighting the unreliability of eyewitness testimony and the improbability of the prosecution's narrative in a murder case under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

The Supreme Court meticulously analyzed the reliability of witness testimonies, the veracity of the alleged motive and presence at the crime scene, and the handling of the extra-judicial confession. The Court highlighted major discrepancies and contradictions in witness statements and the lack of corroborative evidence, leading to the acquittal of the appellant, Dharambir @ Dharma.

Dharambir was convicted for the murder of Karambir based on eyewitness testimony by the victim's brother and an alleged extra-judicial confession. The motive was suspected illicit relations between the victim and the appellant's wife. However, the presence of Dharambir at the crime scene and his motive were not substantiated beyond reasonable doubt, leading to legal scrutiny by the apex court.

Reliability of Eyewitnesses: The Court noted "grave contradictions" in the testimony of the main witness, Krishan Kumar (PW-5), including discrepancies about the time of the incident and lack of physical evidence (blood stains) that could substantiate his presence at the crime scene.

Examination of Motive and Presence at the Crime Scene: The alleged motive was not only weak but also unsupported by any solid evidence. The accused's presence at the cinema at the same time as the victim was considered "highly improbable" by the Court.

Judicial Handling of Extra Judicial Confessions: The Court reiterated that extra-judicial confessions are inherently weak evidence and require significant corroborative support, which was absent in this case. The confession was discredited due to contradictions and the lack of corroborative evidence.

Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the previous convictions and acquitted Dharambir, citing the unreliability of key witness testimonies and the uncorroborated nature of the extra-judicial confession.

Date of Decision: 16th April 2024

Dharambir @ Dharma v. State of Haryana

Latest Legal News