Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Unlock Premises and Comply with Safety Measures: Karnataka High Court Orders in Firecracker Sale Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling by the Karnataka High Court, the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suraj Govindaraj ordered the unlocking of premises and strict compliance with safety measures for the sale of firecrackers in Bengaluru.

The court was hearing a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by firecracker sellers, who faced hurdles in conducting their business due to their premises being locked by authorities. The petitioners, represented by senior counsel Sri. Satish M. Doddamani and advocate Sri. Sagar B.B., argued that despite holding a valid license, their business operations were unjustly hampered.

In his order, Justice Govindaraj emphasized the need for adherence to safety standards, stating, “The petitioners in this petition shall conduct their respective businesses strictly in consonance with the observations made in the inspection report dated 8.11.2023.” This directive came after the Deputy Solicitor General of India, Sri. Shanthi Bhushan, presented an inspection report indicating non-compliance by the petitioners.

Further, the court mandated that any deviations from the safety observations or failure to implement necessary corrective measures would expose the petitioners to the risk of suspension of their business. The Deputy Commissioner was instructed to inspect and take action based on compliance by the petitioners.

Highlighting the need for thorough license verification, the court also ordered that in future, the Deputy Commissioner should sign or e-sign every page of the license. In cases of disputed licenses, forensic verification was directed, with the Chief Secretary instructed to initiate disciplinary action in cases of unauthorized signatures.

The ruling also referenced the precedent set in the case of M/s Cracker Bazaar vs Commissioner of Police and others, guiding the current decision-making process.

This judgement is seen as a crucial step in balancing the rights of businesses to operate within legal frameworks while ensuring public safety and adherence to regulatory standards. The court’s decision to dispose of the writ petition with specific directions underscores its commitment to upholding legal procedures and safety norms in commercial activities.

With specific directions underscores its commitment to upholding legal procedures and safety norms in commercial activities.

Date of Decision: 10 November, 2023

SMT. SWETHA .M VS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Latest Legal News