Summary Security Force Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Civil Offences Beyond Simple Hurt And Theft: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Vague Allegations Cannot Dissolve a Sacred Marital Relationship: Karnataka High Court Upholds Dismissal of Divorce Petition Daughters Entitled to Coparcenary Rights in Ancestral Property under Hindu Succession Act, 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Divorce | False Allegations of Domestic Violence and Paternity Questions Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Hostile Witness Testimony Admissible if Corroborated by Independent Evidence: Punjab and Haryana High Court Fraud Must Be Specifically Pleaded and Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt to Invalidate Registered Documents: Andhra Pradesh High Court Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Rash Driving Conviction But Grants Probation to First-Time Offender Bus Driver Orissa High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband Convicted of Wife's Murder Merit Cannot Be Sacrificed for Procedural Technicalities in NEET UG Admissions: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Upholds Partition Decrees: Unregistered Partition Deed Inadmissible, Fails to Prove Prior Partition - Joint Hindu Family Property Presumed Undivided: Patna High Court Section 195(1)(b) CrPC | Judicial Integrity Cannot Be Undermined: Supreme Court Restores Evidence Tampering Case In a NDPS Case Readiness and Willingness, Not Time, Decide Equity in Sale Agreements: Supreme Court Denies Specific Performance Prolonged Detention Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 21: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Money Laundering Case DV ACT | Economic Abuse Includes Alienation of Assets, Necessitating Protection Orders: Allahabad High Court Illegal Structures to Face Demolition: Bombay HC Directs Strict Action Against Unauthorized Constructions Justice Must Extend to the Last Person Behind Bars: Supreme Court Pushes for Full Implementation of BNSS Section 479 to Relieve Undertrial Prisoners Efficiency Over Central Oversight: Supreme Court Asserts Need for Localized SIT in Chennai Case Partition, Not Injunction, Is Remedy for Joint Property Disputes: P&H High Court Dismisses Plea Subsequent Purchaser Can Question Plaintiff’s Intent: MP High Court Clarifies Specific Relief Act Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act

Uniform Applicability of Benefits Across Departments: Gujarat High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Justice Hemant M. Prachchhak Reinforces 1988 Government Resolution for All Daily Wage Workers, Ensuring Fair Treatment

In a significant ruling, the Gujarat High Court, under the judgment delivered by Justice Hemant M. Prachchhak, upheld the rights of a daily wage worker, Dilipbhai Gopalbhai Bavaliya, affirming the applicability of the 1988 Government Resolution (G.R.) concerning benefits for daily wage employees across various government departments. The Court quashed the impugned order and recovery notice issued by the respondents, directing the appropriate revision of pay and payment of arrears to the petitioner.

Dilipbhai Gopalbhai Bavaliya, appointed as a daily wager on the post of Peon on October 11, 1985, had continuously rendered his services under the respondents. Despite fulfilling the criteria for benefits under the G.R. dated October 17, 1988, the petitioner faced the withdrawal of these benefits following an audit objection. Subsequent legal battles led to multiple appeals, with the petitioner seeking justice against the arbitrary and unjust actions of the respondents.

Justice Prachchhak emphasized that the 1988 G.R. is applicable to daily wage workers across all departments of the Gujarat government, not just limited to the Roads & Buildings Department. The court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in "State of Gujarat and Ors. vs. PWD Employees Union and Ors.," which reinforced this applicability.

The judgment highlighted previous decisions by the Gujarat High Court and the Supreme Court that have consistently upheld the rights of daily wage workers to receive benefits under the 1988 G.R. Justice Prachchhak noted the discriminatory practice of denying these benefits to the petitioner, despite similar workers in other departments receiving them.

The court criticized the respondents for failing to provide a fair hearing and for issuing recovery notices without proper justification. Justice Prachchhak underscored the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and providing opportunities for representation before making such decisions.

"The Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988 is applicable to the daily wage workers in all departments of the State of Gujarat. Any action contrary to this principle is not only illegal but also discriminatory," observed Justice Prachchhak, underscoring the broader applicability of the resolution.

The judgment meticulously discussed the legal precedents and principles of equity, reinforcing the stance that government resolutions aimed at benefiting daily wage workers must be uniformly applied across all departments. The court reiterated that denying these benefits based on departmental affiliation is unjust and against established legal norms.

The Gujarat High Court's ruling in favor of Dilipbhai Gopalbhai Bavaliya sets a crucial precedent for the treatment of daily wage workers across the state. By reaffirming the applicability of the 1988 Government Resolution, the court has ensured that workers in similar positions receive equitable treatment, thereby strengthening the legal framework for labor rights in Gujarat. This landmark decision is expected to have far-reaching implications, promoting fairness and justice for daily wage employees across various government departments.

Date of Decision: May 9, 2024

Dilipbhai Gopalbhai Bavaliya vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.

Similar News