Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Limitation For Redemption Of Usufructuary Mortgage Starts Only When Mortgage Money Is Paid Or Tendered: Allahabad High Court Exclusion Of Natural Heir From Will Not A Suspicious Circumstance If Execution Is Duly Proved: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Travel Abroad Is A Basic Human Right; Permission Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Visit Is For 'Social Or Celebratory' Purpose: Andhra Pradesh High Court Citizen Cannot Be Externed Merely For Raising Grievances Against Government Decisions: Bombay High Court Lack Of Opportunity To Cross-Examine Partition Commissioner Does Not Vitiate Final Decree; Report Is Part Of Record: Calcutta High Court Section 27 Evidence Act Recoveries Inadmissible If Police Had Prior Knowledge Of Location Before Recording Disclosure: Delhi High Court Foreigners Act | Burden Of Proof To Establish Citizenship Solely On Proceedee, Never Shifts; Prescription For Parkinson's No Proof Of Mental Illness To Explain Testimony Contradictions: Gauhati High Court Trial Court Erred In Abating Suit While Application To Bring Legal Heirs On Record Was Pending: Gujarat High Court Places Of Worship Act 1991 Not A Shield Against Land Acquisition By State For Public Purpose: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Partition Deed Creating New Rights In Immovable Property Inadmissible In Evidence: Himachal Pradesh High Court Illiteracy No Excuse For Filing False Income Tax Returns, Court Must Presume Culpable Mental State Under Section 278E: Jharkhand High Court Trial Court Must Consider Convenience Of Family & Accused's Right To Assist Counsel While Deciding Jail Shifting Applications: J&K High Court Investigation Substantially Complete, Offence Carries Max 7 Years Jail: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail To Police Officers In Corruption Case Buyer's Knowledge Of Title Defect Doesn't Extinguish Statutory Warranty Of Title Unless Sale Deed Specifically Excludes It: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Sets Aside Appointment Of PAs To Judges, Says Relaxation Of Qualifications Via Circular Violates Article 14 BNSS | Mere Allegation Of Calling Deceased To Spot Not Sufficient To Deny Bail To Woman If Charge Sheet Filed: Orissa High Court Amendment To Rectify Property Description In Agreement To Sell Can Be Allowed At Any Stage Of Specific Performance Suit: Delhi High Court NDPS | Confession Before Police Cannot Be Sole Basis For Prosecution: Telangana High Court Grants Bail No Judicial Sanctity For Adulterous Relationships: J&K High Court Refuses To Quash Abduction FIR Involving Married Woman Habitual Offender Accused Of Brutal Murder Of SC Community Member Denied Bail: Kerala High Court Prosecution Fails To Prove Murder Charge As Recovery Witnesses Turn Hostile: Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Man Acquittal In Criminal Case Based On Benefit Of Doubt Does Not Automatically Absolve Employee From Disciplinary Liability: Madhya Pradesh High Court Punjab & Haryana HC Quashes FIR Against Woman For Dressing Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Personal Laws Cannot Be Used As Shield To Commit Gang Rape Under Garb Of Nikah Halala: Allahabad High Court

Unfounded Allegations of Premarital Relations And Abortion Not Sufficient For Divorce: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking decision, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has established a significant legal precedent by ruling that unfounded allegations of premarital relations and abortion are not sufficient grounds for divorce. This landmark judgment was delivered in a divorce case that involved allegations of cruelty and desertion brought by the appellant (husband) and a counterclaim for restitution of conjugal rights by the respondent (wife).

The court's pivotal observation reads, "Allegations of cruelty stemming from the wife's purported confession of premarital relations and abortion—Burden of proof rests with the appellant to substantiate cruelty—Failure to provide substantial evidence of the alleged confession or abortion—Absence of corroborating evidence for the appellant's claims."

At the heart of the case were the appellant's allegations that his wife had admitted to engaging in premarital relations and undergoing an abortion before their marriage. He sought a divorce on the grounds of cruelty, citing these allegations. However, the court determined that the appellant had not been able to validate these claims with concrete evidence or independent corroboration.

The judgment also underscored the wife's willingness to reconcile and rejoin her husband, underscoring her commitment to the marriage. Additionally, the court noted that the appellant had abandoned the respondent without reasonable cause, further strengthening her case for a decree of restitution of conjugal rights.

This verdict emphasizes the importance of providing substantial proof and corroborating evidence in divorce cases predicated on allegations of cruelty. As demonstrated in this instance, unfounded accusations do not meet the threshold for divorce under Indian law.

The judgment cited specific legal provisions within the Hindu Marriage Act, including Section 12 (null and void marriages) and Section 13(1)(ia) (grounds for divorce). It also referenced Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which deals with the restitution of conjugal rights.

Date of Decision: 19 September 2023

BODDU JAYA KRISHNA vs BODDU NAGA PRAVEENA 

Latest Legal News