Allegations In Matrimonial Disputes Must Be Specific And Supported By Foundation Facts To Avoid Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Sentence To Period Already Undergone Citing Medical Condition And Expression Of Remorse Qualification Of '10+2 System' Cannot Be Equated With Other Certifications Absent An Equivalence Clause: Supreme Court Essential Qualifications In Recruitment Cannot Be Diluted Or Subject To Judicial Equivalence: Supreme Court Court Has Discretion To Decide Genuineness Of Signature By Comparison; Not Essential To Invoke Expert Opinion In All Cases: Supreme Court Civil Disputes Cannot Be Converted Into Criminal Offences To Recover Money: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Under Section 420 IPC Taxing Authorities Must Classify Goods Based On Form At Time Of Sale, Not End Use: Supreme Court Suit For Declaration Of Status Must Seek Consequential Relief To Avoid Bar Of Proviso: Allahabad High Court Illegal Detention | Police Failure To Maintain CCTV Footage Invokes Adverse Presumption Under Sec 119 BSA Against State: Allahabad High Court Section 138 NI Act | Accused Rebuts Presumption By Proving Intimation Of Misplaced Cheque To Bank And Lack Of Documentation For Alleged Settlement: Andhra Pradesh High Court Garnishee Proceedings Under CPC | Disputed Debt Cannot Be Summarily Adjudicated Without Leading Evidence: Bombay High Court Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act 2022 | Magistrate’s Power Under Section 5 To Direct DNA Profiling Is Not Conditional Upon Consent: Calcutta High Court Conviction Based On 'Assumption And Presumption' Cannot Be Sustained: Bombay High Court Acquits Husband Limitation Act | Suit For Specific Performance Must Be Filed Within Reasonable Time Even If No Date For Performance Is Fixed: Delhi High Court Enrolment As Advocate | Bar Council Must Consider 'Equivalent Qualifications' Under Rule 4(a) Rules Of Legal Education: Karnataka High Court Section 482 BNSS | Pre-Arrest Bail Is Not A Matter Of Course; Must Show Special Case For Invoking Extraordinary Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Hindu Succession Act | A Co-parcener Cannot Alienate Entire Property; Non-Impleaded Legal Heir Not Bound By Previous Decree: Madras High Court Purchaser During Pendency Of Suit Bound By Compromise Decree, Cannot Treat It As Void In Collateral Proceedings: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 23 Rule 1-A CPC | In Partition Suits, Defendants Asserting A Share Can Seek Transposition If Original Plaintiffs Withdraw: Patna High Court Section 69 BNS | Suppression Of Subsisting Marriage Or Live-In Relationship During Marriage Proposal Constitutes 'Deceitful Means': Kerala High Court Anticipatory Bail | Mere Apprehension Of Investigating Agency Is Insufficient To Deny Bail Without Demonstrating Necessity Of Custodial Interrogation: Telangana High Court Income Tax Evasion | Criminal Prosecution Under Section 276C IT Act Cannot Sustain Once Foundation Assessment Order Is Set Aside: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Unfounded Allegations of Premarital Relations And Abortion Not Sufficient For Divorce: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking decision, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has established a significant legal precedent by ruling that unfounded allegations of premarital relations and abortion are not sufficient grounds for divorce. This landmark judgment was delivered in a divorce case that involved allegations of cruelty and desertion brought by the appellant (husband) and a counterclaim for restitution of conjugal rights by the respondent (wife).

The court's pivotal observation reads, "Allegations of cruelty stemming from the wife's purported confession of premarital relations and abortion—Burden of proof rests with the appellant to substantiate cruelty—Failure to provide substantial evidence of the alleged confession or abortion—Absence of corroborating evidence for the appellant's claims."

At the heart of the case were the appellant's allegations that his wife had admitted to engaging in premarital relations and undergoing an abortion before their marriage. He sought a divorce on the grounds of cruelty, citing these allegations. However, the court determined that the appellant had not been able to validate these claims with concrete evidence or independent corroboration.

The judgment also underscored the wife's willingness to reconcile and rejoin her husband, underscoring her commitment to the marriage. Additionally, the court noted that the appellant had abandoned the respondent without reasonable cause, further strengthening her case for a decree of restitution of conjugal rights.

This verdict emphasizes the importance of providing substantial proof and corroborating evidence in divorce cases predicated on allegations of cruelty. As demonstrated in this instance, unfounded accusations do not meet the threshold for divorce under Indian law.

The judgment cited specific legal provisions within the Hindu Marriage Act, including Section 12 (null and void marriages) and Section 13(1)(ia) (grounds for divorce). It also referenced Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which deals with the restitution of conjugal rights.

Date of Decision: 19 September 2023

BODDU JAYA KRISHNA vs BODDU NAGA PRAVEENA 

Latest Legal News