Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Accused Languishing In Jail For 9 Years Deserves Bail; Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Violated: Supreme Court Election Disputes Must Be Resolved Expeditiously; Long Stays Render Adjudication A Mockery Of Justice: Madras High Court Delhi High Court Suspends LOC, Permits Businessman To Travel Abroad For Healthcare Conferences; Cites Roots In Society & Past Compliance Section 138 NI Act Complaint Not Maintainable By Third Party Who Is Neither Payee Nor Holder In Due Course: Allahabad High Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

Unfounded Allegations of Premarital Relations And Abortion Not Sufficient For Divorce: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking decision, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has established a significant legal precedent by ruling that unfounded allegations of premarital relations and abortion are not sufficient grounds for divorce. This landmark judgment was delivered in a divorce case that involved allegations of cruelty and desertion brought by the appellant (husband) and a counterclaim for restitution of conjugal rights by the respondent (wife).

The court's pivotal observation reads, "Allegations of cruelty stemming from the wife's purported confession of premarital relations and abortion—Burden of proof rests with the appellant to substantiate cruelty—Failure to provide substantial evidence of the alleged confession or abortion—Absence of corroborating evidence for the appellant's claims."

At the heart of the case were the appellant's allegations that his wife had admitted to engaging in premarital relations and undergoing an abortion before their marriage. He sought a divorce on the grounds of cruelty, citing these allegations. However, the court determined that the appellant had not been able to validate these claims with concrete evidence or independent corroboration.

The judgment also underscored the wife's willingness to reconcile and rejoin her husband, underscoring her commitment to the marriage. Additionally, the court noted that the appellant had abandoned the respondent without reasonable cause, further strengthening her case for a decree of restitution of conjugal rights.

This verdict emphasizes the importance of providing substantial proof and corroborating evidence in divorce cases predicated on allegations of cruelty. As demonstrated in this instance, unfounded accusations do not meet the threshold for divorce under Indian law.

The judgment cited specific legal provisions within the Hindu Marriage Act, including Section 12 (null and void marriages) and Section 13(1)(ia) (grounds for divorce). It also referenced Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which deals with the restitution of conjugal rights.

Date of Decision: 19 September 2023

BODDU JAYA KRISHNA vs BODDU NAGA PRAVEENA 

Latest Legal News