'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Unfounded Allegations of Premarital Relations And Abortion Not Sufficient For Divorce: Andhra Pradesh High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking decision, the Andhra Pradesh High Court has established a significant legal precedent by ruling that unfounded allegations of premarital relations and abortion are not sufficient grounds for divorce. This landmark judgment was delivered in a divorce case that involved allegations of cruelty and desertion brought by the appellant (husband) and a counterclaim for restitution of conjugal rights by the respondent (wife).

The court's pivotal observation reads, "Allegations of cruelty stemming from the wife's purported confession of premarital relations and abortion—Burden of proof rests with the appellant to substantiate cruelty—Failure to provide substantial evidence of the alleged confession or abortion—Absence of corroborating evidence for the appellant's claims."

At the heart of the case were the appellant's allegations that his wife had admitted to engaging in premarital relations and undergoing an abortion before their marriage. He sought a divorce on the grounds of cruelty, citing these allegations. However, the court determined that the appellant had not been able to validate these claims with concrete evidence or independent corroboration.

The judgment also underscored the wife's willingness to reconcile and rejoin her husband, underscoring her commitment to the marriage. Additionally, the court noted that the appellant had abandoned the respondent without reasonable cause, further strengthening her case for a decree of restitution of conjugal rights.

This verdict emphasizes the importance of providing substantial proof and corroborating evidence in divorce cases predicated on allegations of cruelty. As demonstrated in this instance, unfounded accusations do not meet the threshold for divorce under Indian law.

The judgment cited specific legal provisions within the Hindu Marriage Act, including Section 12 (null and void marriages) and Section 13(1)(ia) (grounds for divorce). It also referenced Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which deals with the restitution of conjugal rights.

Date of Decision: 19 September 2023

BODDU JAYA KRISHNA vs BODDU NAGA PRAVEENA 

Latest Legal News