Public Property Cannot Be Managed Privately for Decades — Fair Price Shops in Hospitals Must Be Allotted by Auction: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Registered Sale Deed Alone Does Not Dismantle Prior Security Interest: Gauhati High Court Rejects Buyer’s Writ Against SARFAESI Action, Cites Expanded Statutory Definition Old OBC Certificates Won’t Work — Supreme Court Says Cut-Off Date Is Final in Rajasthan Civil Judge Exams Power of Attorney Is Not a Licence to Defraud: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Reversal of Sham Sale Deeds by GPA Holder Acting Against NRI Principal’s Interests Not Every Advocate Commissioner Appointment Is Evidence Gathering: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Trial Court’s Discretion in Title Dispute No Invalidation Can Be Attached to One-Year LLM for Public Appointments: Madras High Court Orders Retrospective Appointment of Top-Ranked Candidate Section 63 of the Copyright Act | Publisher Can't Be Prosecuted for Author’s Plagiarism Without Proof of Knowledge: Kerala High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Mathrubhumi Directors Old Marital Disputes Aren’t Enough to Prove Suicide Was Instigated: Supreme Court Acquits Man Jailed for Wife’s Death by Fire Dependent Heir Can Remain in Tenanted Premises Only for Five Years from Tenant’s Death Under WB Tenancy Act: Supreme Court Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Employment Contract Binding Even in Termination Disputes: Supreme Court Entrustment Was to Run the Business, Not Occupy the Premises: Supreme Court Denies Deemed Tenancy Under Bombay Rent Act Preliminary Enquiry in Corruption Cases Is Desirable, Not Mandatory: Supreme Court Set Aside Quashing of FIR

True Love Cannot Be Controlled Through Rigours of Law - Allahabad High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Kidnapping and Compelling Marriage Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision, the Allahabad High Court, presided over by Hon'ble Justice Rahul Chaturvedi, has quashed criminal proceedings in four cases related to allegations of kidnapping and compelling marriage under Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC. The court emphasized that “true love between individuals cannot be controlled through rigours of law or State action.”

The judgement revolved around the application of Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., focusing on quashing criminal proceedings against couples who had chosen to marry against their family's wishes. These proceedings were initially based on allegations of kidnapping and abduction.

In each case, the couples, after attaining majority, had eloped and married against their families' wishes. The families lodged criminal complaints, leading to charges under Sections 363 and 366 of the IPC. The court was tasked with assessing the validity of these charges in light of the subsequent consensual marital life of the couples.

The Court conducted a thorough analysis of each case and found that the couples had exercised their right to choose their life partners. It noted that these couples were leading a happy marital life, often with children, and that continuing criminal proceedings would only result in undue hardship. The Court drew upon precedents set by the Supreme Court of India, which uphold the rights of individuals over the age of 18 to make life choices, including the choice of a life partner.

Justice Chaturvedi observed, "When the scale of justice is weighed, it's not only about the law but also about the lives, happiness, and future of individuals involved. Application of law must have a humane face."

The Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the applicants, recognizing the need for a humane approach in law enforcement and acknowledging the well-being of the young couples and their children. It was held that further prosecution would only lead to unwarranted hardship.

 Date of Decision: 13 February 2024

Pradeep Yadav, VS State Of U.P. and Others 

 

Similar News