High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Acquits Accused, Questions “Capacity of Victim to Make Coherent Statement” with 100% Burn Injuries High Court of Himachal Pradesh Dismisses Bail Plea in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam: Rajdeep Singh Case Execution of Conveyance Ends Arbitration Clause; Appeal for Arbitration Rejected: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Denies Tax Refund for Hybrid Vehicle Purchased Before Electric Vehicle Exemption Policy Entering A Room with Someone Cannot, By Any Stretch Of Imagination, Be Considered Consent For Sexual Intercourse: Bombay High Court No Specific Format Needed for Dying Declaration, Focus on Mental State and Voluntariness: Calcutta High Court Delhi High Court Allows Direct Appeal Under DVAT Act Without Tribunal Reference for Pre-2005 Tax Periods NDPS | Mere Registration of Cases Does Not Override Presumption of Innocence: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Previous Antecedents and No Communal Tension: High Court Grants Bail in Caste-Based Abuse Case Detention of Petitioner Would Amount to Pre-Trial Punishment: Karnataka High Court Grants Bail in Dowry Harassment Case Loss of Confidence Must Be Objectively Proven to Deny Reinstatement: Kerala High Court Reinstates Workman After Flawed Domestic Enquiry Procedural lapses should not deny justice: Andhra High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Case Canteen Subsidy Constitutes Part of Dearness Allowance Under EPF Act: Gujarat High Court Concurrent Findings Demonstrate Credibility – Jharkhand High Court Affirms Conviction in Cheating Case 125 Cr.P.C | Financial responsibility towards dependents cannot be shirked due to personal obligations: Punjab and Haryana High Court Mere Acceptance of Money Without Proof of Demand is Not Sufficient to Establish Corruption Charges Gujrat High Court Evidence Insufficient to Support Claims: Orissa High Court Affirms Appellate Court’s Reversal in Wrongful Confinement and Defamation Case Harmonious Interpretation of PWDV Act and Senior Citizens Act is Crucial: Kerala High Court in Domestic Violence Case

TIP Compromised Due to Prior Exposure of Accused's Photographs, Undermining Credibility: Gujarat High Court Uphold Acquittal in Robbery Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Gujarat High Court has upheld the acquittal of XXX and others in a high-profile robbery and assault case, citing significant procedural lapses and insufficient evidence presented by the prosecution. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices Nirzar S. Desai and Hasmukh D. Suthar, reinforces the principle of presumption of innocence and the necessity for the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Court Observations and Views:

Reliability of Test Identification Parade (TIP):

The court scrutinized the reliability of the TIP conducted eight months after the incident, during which the accused’s photographs were published in newspapers. "The TIP was compromised due to prior exposure of the accused’s photographs, which undermines its credibility," the bench noted. The procedural lapses in the TIP were significant enough to dismiss its value as evidence.

Justice Desai observed, "The TIP conducted after such a prolonged delay and subsequent media exposure does not inspire confidence and cannot be relied upon as substantive evidence."

Recovery of Stolen Property:

The prosecution's claim of recovering stolen goods in a melted form was also critically evaluated. The court found the identification of these goods impossible, further weakened by the fact that key panch witnesses had turned hostile and proper procedures under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act were not followed.

Legal Reasoning:

The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to the principles of criminal jurisprudence, particularly the presumption of innocence. The court stated, "The prosecution must prove the case beyond all reasonable doubt. In the absence of credible evidence, the benefit of the doubt must go to the accused."

Quotes from the Judgment:

"The presumption of innocence is not weakened by the fact that the trial court has acquitted the accused. This principle is fundamental to our criminal justice system," remarked Justice Suthar.

Conclusion:

The Gujarat High Court's decision to uphold the trial court's acquittal of the accused underscores the critical importance of procedural integrity and compelling evidence in criminal trials. This judgment highlights the judiciary's commitment to safeguarding the rights of the accused and ensuring that convictions are based on solid, reliable evidence. The case sets a significant precedent for future criminal trials, particularly concerning the reliability of identification procedures and the necessity of adhering to legal protocols.

Date of Decision: 22nd May 2024

State of Gujarat v. XXX

Similar News