Lack Of Boundaries In Sale Deed Not Fatal To Title If Plot Number & Parent Title Are Sufficiently Identifiable: Calcutta High Court Terror Perception Of Underworld Justifies Delay In Invoking MCOCA; Purely Civil Disputes Can Metamorphose Into Criminal Offence: Bombay High Court Identical Wills Executed By Spouses On Same Day Not Necessarily 'Mutual Wills' Restricting Power Of Alienation: Delhi High Court Written Notice Not Mandatory For Revoking Permission Under Section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act: Gujarat High Court Wife Cannot Maintain Complaint Against Husband Under Senior Citizens Act; Not Intended For Spousal Disputes: Karnataka High Court Mere Presence At Scene Or Facilitation Without Intent To Aid Crime Does Not Amount To Abetment: Delhi High Court Offences Under IT Act Punishable With 3 Years Imprisonment Are Bailable Under Section 77B: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In KCA Data Theft Case Premature Release Can't Be Denied Citing Section 435 CrPC If Sentence Under Central Act Is Already Served: Madras High Court Suppression Of Higher Qualification To Secure Job Reserved For Lower Education Is Foundational Fraud, Sympathy Has No Role: Supreme Court MBBS Admissions | Candidate Using NIOS Marks To Meet 50% Eligibility Cannot Claim State Govt School Quota: Orissa High Court High Court Cannot Exercise Article 227 Power To Strike Off Plaint When Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Exists: Madras High Court Section 69 IEA | Onus On Propounder To Lead Secondary Evidence & Remove Suspicious Circumstances If Attesting Witnesses Are Dead: Telangana High Court

The parties are governed by the terms in the contract - SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


State of Kerala is assailing an order passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam. M/s Joseph & Company, as also the respondent State of Kerala, had filed Writ Appeals to the extent they were aggrieved. An extent of the leased land measuring 50 acres has been sold without consent to Mr. Raghavan. Clause 12 of the lease agreement provided that default if any committed could be remedied if the lessee was put on notice. The contention that leases rentals were being paid in respect of the entire extent cannot be accepted outright as no contention was urged and details were not laid in original proceedings. The Division Bench was not justified in concluding that the non­issue of notice and not providing opportunity to remedy the default is fatal. Section 111(g) of the T.P. Act though noticed, the parties are governed by the terms in the contract and as such the lessee cannot claim benefit under the said provision. 

September 03, 2021 

State Of Kerala & Anothers Versus  M/s Joseph & Company  

Latest Legal News