Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal

The Drill of Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. is Mandatory in Nature: High Court of Punjab & Haryana Sets Aside Summoning Order for Non-Compliance with Section 202 Cr.P.C. in Defamation Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has set aside a summoning order in a defamation case for non-compliance with the mandatory procedure under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.). The order, passed by Justice Harpreet Singh Brar, emphasized the necessity of an inquiry or investigation before issuing process against a person, especially when they reside outside the jurisdiction of the court.

The crux of the judgement revolves around the adherence to procedural requirements under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C., which mandates an inquiry or investigation before summoning an individual accused of defamation under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The petitioner, Jasbir Singh, was accused of defaming the respondent, Manmohan Singh, via a WhatsApp message and was subsequently summoned by a Judicial Magistrate. The petitioner contested the summoning order, arguing that there was no compliance with the mandatory inquiry process under Section 202 Cr.P.C. before issuing the summons.

Justice Brar, in his assessment, referred to several precedents, including the Supreme Court judgments in Abhijit Pawar vs. Hemant Madhukar (2017) and National Bank of Oman vs. Barakara Abdul Aziz (2013), as well as a previous judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court. These cases underscored the importance of fulfilling the procedural requirements under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C.

In particular, the Court observed that the summoning order dated October 4, 2023, was passed without conducting an inquiry or investigation as required under Section 202. The Court emphasized that such non-compliance rendered the summoning order unsustainable.

Conclusively, the Court allowed the petition, setting aside the summoning order and remanding the matter back to the Judicial Magistrate for fresh consideration. The Magistrate was directed to comply with the procedural requisites under Section 202 Cr.P.C. before issuing any process.

Date of Decision: February 16, 2024

Jasbir Singh vs. Manmohan Singh

Latest Legal News