Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

The Drill of Section 202 of the Cr.P.C. is Mandatory in Nature: High Court of Punjab & Haryana Sets Aside Summoning Order for Non-Compliance with Section 202 Cr.P.C. in Defamation Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has set aside a summoning order in a defamation case for non-compliance with the mandatory procedure under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.). The order, passed by Justice Harpreet Singh Brar, emphasized the necessity of an inquiry or investigation before issuing process against a person, especially when they reside outside the jurisdiction of the court.

The crux of the judgement revolves around the adherence to procedural requirements under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C., which mandates an inquiry or investigation before summoning an individual accused of defamation under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The petitioner, Jasbir Singh, was accused of defaming the respondent, Manmohan Singh, via a WhatsApp message and was subsequently summoned by a Judicial Magistrate. The petitioner contested the summoning order, arguing that there was no compliance with the mandatory inquiry process under Section 202 Cr.P.C. before issuing the summons.

Justice Brar, in his assessment, referred to several precedents, including the Supreme Court judgments in Abhijit Pawar vs. Hemant Madhukar (2017) and National Bank of Oman vs. Barakara Abdul Aziz (2013), as well as a previous judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court. These cases underscored the importance of fulfilling the procedural requirements under Section 202 of the Cr.P.C.

In particular, the Court observed that the summoning order dated October 4, 2023, was passed without conducting an inquiry or investigation as required under Section 202. The Court emphasized that such non-compliance rendered the summoning order unsustainable.

Conclusively, the Court allowed the petition, setting aside the summoning order and remanding the matter back to the Judicial Magistrate for fresh consideration. The Magistrate was directed to comply with the procedural requisites under Section 202 Cr.P.C. before issuing any process.

Date of Decision: February 16, 2024

Jasbir Singh vs. Manmohan Singh

Latest Legal News