Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Validates Will, Dismisses Sale Deed in Property Dispute: Signature in Sale Deed Pales into Insignificance

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has restored the judgments of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court in a contentious property dispute, emphasizing the validity of a Will over a contested Sale Deed.

Legal Point of Judgment: The central legal issue revolved around the ownership of a property in Ishwaripura Ward, Katni. The dispute pitted a registered Sale Deed against a Will. While the plaintiff, Savitri Bai, claimed ownership based on the Sale Deed dated January 18, 1979, the defendant asserted possession through a Will dated March 23, 1977, in favor of Meghraj, son of the first defendant. The Supreme Court’s decision hinged on the assessment of these two conflicting documents.

Facts and Issues: The case, originating from Civil Suit No. 22A/80, saw various twists through the judicial hierarchy. The Trial Court and the First Appellate Court had initially sided with the defendant, recognizing the Will’s validity. However, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh reversed this decision, favoring the Sale Deed. The Supreme Court’s intervention was sought to resolve this conflict.

Court’s Assessment: The apex court meticulously analyzed the evidence surrounding the Will and the Sale Deed. Justice Sanjay Kumar, delivering the judgment, underscored the significance of the Will, which had been duly proved in compliance with Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872, and Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Court criticized the High Court’s approach, stating, “The knowledge imputed by the High Court to the first defendant in relation to the said sale deed was not warranted.” The Court observed that the first defendant’s lack of education and her inadvertent signing of multiple sale deeds did not detract from the Will’s legitimacy.

Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal, thereby setting aside the judgment of the High Court and reinstating the decisions of the lower courts. It was held that the property rightfully belonged to Meghraj as per the Will, rendering the Sale Deed ineffective in this context.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

SAVITRI BAI AND ANOTHER VS SAVITRI BAI

Latest Legal News