Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

Supreme Court Validates Will, Dismisses Sale Deed in Property Dispute: Signature in Sale Deed Pales into Insignificance

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has restored the judgments of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court in a contentious property dispute, emphasizing the validity of a Will over a contested Sale Deed.

Legal Point of Judgment: The central legal issue revolved around the ownership of a property in Ishwaripura Ward, Katni. The dispute pitted a registered Sale Deed against a Will. While the plaintiff, Savitri Bai, claimed ownership based on the Sale Deed dated January 18, 1979, the defendant asserted possession through a Will dated March 23, 1977, in favor of Meghraj, son of the first defendant. The Supreme Court’s decision hinged on the assessment of these two conflicting documents.

Facts and Issues: The case, originating from Civil Suit No. 22A/80, saw various twists through the judicial hierarchy. The Trial Court and the First Appellate Court had initially sided with the defendant, recognizing the Will’s validity. However, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh reversed this decision, favoring the Sale Deed. The Supreme Court’s intervention was sought to resolve this conflict.

Court’s Assessment: The apex court meticulously analyzed the evidence surrounding the Will and the Sale Deed. Justice Sanjay Kumar, delivering the judgment, underscored the significance of the Will, which had been duly proved in compliance with Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872, and Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Court criticized the High Court’s approach, stating, “The knowledge imputed by the High Court to the first defendant in relation to the said sale deed was not warranted.” The Court observed that the first defendant’s lack of education and her inadvertent signing of multiple sale deeds did not detract from the Will’s legitimacy.

Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal, thereby setting aside the judgment of the High Court and reinstating the decisions of the lower courts. It was held that the property rightfully belonged to Meghraj as per the Will, rendering the Sale Deed ineffective in this context.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

SAVITRI BAI AND ANOTHER VS SAVITRI BAI

Latest Legal News