MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Validates Will, Dismisses Sale Deed in Property Dispute: Signature in Sale Deed Pales into Insignificance

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has restored the judgments of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court in a contentious property dispute, emphasizing the validity of a Will over a contested Sale Deed.

Legal Point of Judgment: The central legal issue revolved around the ownership of a property in Ishwaripura Ward, Katni. The dispute pitted a registered Sale Deed against a Will. While the plaintiff, Savitri Bai, claimed ownership based on the Sale Deed dated January 18, 1979, the defendant asserted possession through a Will dated March 23, 1977, in favor of Meghraj, son of the first defendant. The Supreme Court’s decision hinged on the assessment of these two conflicting documents.

Facts and Issues: The case, originating from Civil Suit No. 22A/80, saw various twists through the judicial hierarchy. The Trial Court and the First Appellate Court had initially sided with the defendant, recognizing the Will’s validity. However, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh reversed this decision, favoring the Sale Deed. The Supreme Court’s intervention was sought to resolve this conflict.

Court’s Assessment: The apex court meticulously analyzed the evidence surrounding the Will and the Sale Deed. Justice Sanjay Kumar, delivering the judgment, underscored the significance of the Will, which had been duly proved in compliance with Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872, and Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The Court criticized the High Court’s approach, stating, “The knowledge imputed by the High Court to the first defendant in relation to the said sale deed was not warranted.” The Court observed that the first defendant’s lack of education and her inadvertent signing of multiple sale deeds did not detract from the Will’s legitimacy.

Decision: The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal, thereby setting aside the judgment of the High Court and reinstating the decisions of the lower courts. It was held that the property rightfully belonged to Meghraj as per the Will, rendering the Sale Deed ineffective in this context.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

SAVITRI BAI AND ANOTHER VS SAVITRI BAI

Latest Legal News