-
by Admin
07 May 2024 2:49 AM
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India upheld the termination of services of a petitioner who had been appointed as a temporary Collection Peon. The Court further invalidated a subsequent promotion granted to the petitioner, which was based on an interim order following the termination. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising of Justices Abhay S. Oka and Pankaj Mithal.
The petitioner’s services were terminated with notice and salary in 1998, but he continued functioning in his role under an interim order. This allowed him to subsequently secure a promotion as Collection Amin in 2009. The Court, however, found that the termination order had attained finality and remained unchallenged, rendering the promotion invalid after the Special Leave Petition was dismissed. The Court stated, “Any promotion given to the petitioner consequent to his continuance in service on the strength of the interim order would automatically fall to the ground once the Special Leave Petition is dismissed and the termination order attains finality.” (Para 11)
The Court upheld the Division Bench’s decision to allow the appeal filed by the State, which had challenged the petitioner’s promotion based on the termination of his services. The Court noted that the petitioner’s continuation in service and subsequent promotion were contingent on the interim order, which lost significance after the termination order’s finality was established.
The bench also directed that the respondents should refrain from initiating any recovery of the salary drawn by the petitioner for the period he actually worked. The Court’s decision emphasized the importance of adherence to termination orders and the impact of interim orders on subsequent promotions.
DATE OF DECISION: August 29, 2023
JAGPAL SINGH vs THE STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/29-Aug-2023_Jagpal_Vs_State.pdf"]
