-
by Admin
07 May 2024 2:49 AM
The apex court, led by Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, emphasized the importance of interpreting commercial agreements in line with the original intent of the parties. The judgment, delivered on November 9, 2023, reaffirmed the sanctity of the PPA and clarified the obligations of the parties involved.
In its observation, the Court stated, "A commercial document cannot be interpreted in a manner to arrive at a complete variance with what may originally have been the intendment of the parties. Such a situation can only be contemplated when the implied term can be considered necessary to lend efficacy to the terms of the contract."
The dispute revolved around whether MSEDCL was obligated to pay fixed capacity charges under the PPA for power supplied by RGPPL based on RLNG, without the prior approval of the appellant. The Court's ruling clarified that such capacity charges are considered fixed charges under the PPA and are not subject to the appellant's consent.
The judgment also highlighted the context in which the PPA was established, given the challenges faced by RGPPL due to a nationwide shortage of domestic gas. It noted that the deviation from the plain terms of the contract was not warranted in the circumstances and could impact the viability of the project.
This decision has significant implications for power purchase agreements and commercial contracts in India, emphasizing the need for parties to adhere to the original intent and terms of such agreements. The Court's ruling reaffirms the sanctity of contracts and their interpretation in accordance with the parties' intentions.
Date of Decision: November 09, 2023
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited VS Ratnagiri Gas and Power Private Limited & Ors.