MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Upholds Power Purchase Agreement, Rejects Appeal for Capacity Charges Based on RLNG Declarations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the terms of a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) and dismissed an appeal by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL). The appeal sought to challenge the liability of paying fixed capacity charges based on capacity declarations made on Recycled Liquid Natural Gas (RLNG) by Ratnagiri Gas and Power Private Limited (RGPPL).

The apex court, led by Chief Justice Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, along with Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, emphasized the importance of interpreting commercial agreements in line with the original intent of the parties. The judgment, delivered on November 9, 2023, reaffirmed the sanctity of the PPA and clarified the obligations of the parties involved.

In its observation, the Court stated, "A commercial document cannot be interpreted in a manner to arrive at a complete variance with what may originally have been the intendment of the parties. Such a situation can only be contemplated when the implied term can be considered necessary to lend efficacy to the terms of the contract."

The dispute revolved around whether MSEDCL was obligated to pay fixed capacity charges under the PPA for power supplied by RGPPL based on RLNG, without the prior approval of the appellant. The Court's ruling clarified that such capacity charges are considered fixed charges under the PPA and are not subject to the appellant's consent.

The judgment also highlighted the context in which the PPA was established, given the challenges faced by RGPPL due to a nationwide shortage of domestic gas. It noted that the deviation from the plain terms of the contract was not warranted in the circumstances and could impact the viability of the project.

This decision has significant implications for power purchase agreements and commercial contracts in India, emphasizing the need for parties to adhere to the original intent and terms of such agreements. The Court's ruling reaffirms the sanctity of contracts and their interpretation in accordance with the parties' intentions.

Date of Decision: November 09, 2023

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited VS Ratnagiri Gas and Power Private Limited & Ors.

Latest Legal News