MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Supreme Court Upholds ‘Lawful Settlement’ in Matrimonial Dispute, Grants Mutual Consent Divorce

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment by the Supreme Court of India, presided over by Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, a matrimonial dispute involving a transfer petition and a mutual consent divorce reached its conclusion. The bench, acknowledging the complexities of marital discords, stated, “the same are lawful and there is no legal impediment in accepting the same,” thereby emphasizing the legitimacy of the settlement agreement reached between the parties.

The case, filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, initially sought the transfer of a matrimonial case from the Family Court in Belagavi, Karnataka, to Mumbai, Maharashtra. However, during the proceedings, the petitioner and respondent, identified in court documents as Vrushali and Dinesh, respectively, engaged in mediation and reached a mutual agreement for the dissolution of their marriage.

This landmark decision was not just about the transfer of the case but also revolved around the mutual consent divorce under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. The agreement included detailed financial settlements and property arrangements, including a sum of ₹7,50,000 paid by the petitioner to the respondent and arrangements regarding local body taxes and CIDCO transfer charges.

In their order, the Justices meticulously outlined the terms of the settlement, which also included provisions about a gold loan and property transfer. The court’s acceptance of the settlement as lawful played a crucial role in the resolution of this case. The mutual consent divorce was granted under Section 13B(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, marking a significant step in the court’s approach to marital dispute resolutions.

Moreover, the judgment led to the quashing of all proceedings initiated by each party against the other, emphasizing the finality and comprehensive nature of the settlement. This case sets a precedent for how mutual consent and lawful agreements can pave the way for amicable resolutions in marital disputes.

Date of Decision: 10 November 2023

VRUSHALI VS DINESH

Latest Legal News