-
by Admin
07 May 2024 2:49 AM
In a recent judgment dated October 05, 2023, the Supreme Court of India ruled on a significant eviction case where a tenant challenged an eviction order under Section 13-B of the Act. The Court upheld the eviction order, emphasizing that the tenant failed to provide sufficient grounds to disentitle the landlord from obtaining a summary eviction order.
The case involved Mukesh Kumar, the tenant of Shop No. 5 at Guru Amardas Chowk, Model Town, Jalandhar, who had been facing eviction from the said shop. S. Kuldeep Singh, the owner, had filed an Eviction Application under Section 13-B of the Act, stating that he required the premises for his use. Kumar contested the eviction, disputing Singh's ownership and claiming that Singh possessed other shops, which he argued disqualified the eviction under Section 13-B.
The Supreme Court, in its judgment, highlighted that the tenant had failed to establish valid grounds to contest the eviction. It noted that Mukesh Kumar's objections, including his dispute over the landlord's ownership and the alleged possession of other shops, were unsustainable.
The Court emphasized the importance of the tenant's responsibility to disclose facts that would disentitle the landlord from obtaining a summary eviction order under Section 13-B of the Act. It clarified that the onus was on the tenant to provide such grounds, which Mukesh Kumar had not adequately done in this case.
Supreme Court upheld the eviction order, affirming the decisions of the Rent Controller and the High Court. The Court's ruling signifies the significance of complying with the legal requirements for eviction and the need for tenants to establish strong and valid defenses when contesting eviction orders.
Date of Decision: October 05, 2023
MUKESH KUMAR vs S. KULDEEP SINGH
