Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Notorious Alcohol Poisoning Case: The Whole Business Itself Was a Conspiracy

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India upheld the convictions of two individuals, Sajeev (A10) and Roy (A11), in a high-profile case involving the tragic alcohol poisoning incident that led to several deaths and numerous injuries. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Sanjay Karol, delivered a detailed verdict, affirming the sentences previously imposed by the lower courts.

The case, which has drawn considerable public attention, revolves around the mixing of methyl alcohol with spirit, resulting in the poisoning of many, causing blindness, injuries, and fatalities. The Supreme Court, in its decision, noted, "The whole business itself was a conspiracy," highlighting the severity and premeditated nature of the crime.

Sajeev and Roy were convicted under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Abkari Act, including Sections 302, 307, 326 read with Section 120B of the IPC, and Sections 55(a), (h), (i), and 57 (A)(1)(ii) of the Abkari Act. The judgment emphasized the comprehensive evidence presented, including witness testimonies and forensic evidence, which played a crucial role in establishing the guilt of the accused.

The Court meticulously dissected the testimonies of key witnesses and the forensic analysis to substantiate the involvement of the accused in the conspiracy and the act of poisoning. In its detailed analysis, the bench underlined, "The conviction under Section 57(A)(1)(ii) of the Abkari Act is independently affirmed, as [the accused] were not only part of the business of mixing methanol but had actively taken part in it."

While the appeal of Sajeev abated due to his demise, the Court dismissed the appeal of Roy and directed him to surrender forthwith, canceling the bail previously granted. This judgment not only reasserts the rule of law but also serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of engaging in activities that endanger public health and safety.

The judgment has been welcomed by many as a testament to the judiciary's commitment to upholding justice in the face of heinous crimes. It also sends a strong message against the illegal and dangerous adulteration of consumable goods, emphasizing the Court's stance on public safety and legal accountability.

Date of Decision: 9th November 2023

SAJEEV VS STATE OF KERALA