Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Delay in Delivery of Handicraft Goods by Kuwait Airways

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has upheld compensation awarded for the delay in the delivery of consignments of handicraft goods by Kuwait Airways. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and Prashant Kumar Mishra, addresses a consumer dispute brought by M/S. Rajasthan Art Emporium against the airline.

The case revolved around the appellant, an exporter of handicraft goods, who had sent shipments to the USA, specifically to M/s. Williams Sonoma Inc. The shipments were meant to be delivered urgently, with a specified delivery schedule. However, the consignments did not reach their destination in Memphis, USA, as per the schedule, causing significant delays.

The appellant filed a complaint seeking compensation for the loss of business and reputation, as well as damages for the delay in delivering the goods. Initially, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) awarded compensation for the loss of goods, but the matter was appealed, leading to a reconsideration of the delay issue.

The NCDRC ultimately awarded compensation for the delay in delivering the consignment, taking into account the weight of the goods and relevant provisions of the Carriage by Air Act, 1972. The appellant, however, sought a larger compensation amount.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court upheld the NCDRC's decision on compensation, emphasizing the onus on the airline to prove that its agent had no authority to provide the delivery schedule. The Court also noted that the appellant's claim was limited to the amount initially sought in the complaint.

The ruling sets an important precedent for consumer disputes related to delayed deliveries and highlights the significance of adherence to delivery schedules in commercial transactions.

"Once the agent has issued a time schedule for delivery of consignment, it cannot be said that there is no material indicating that there was no agreement for delivery of the consignment in time," observed the Supreme Court.

The decision reaffirms the importance of timely delivery in business transactions and underscores the liability of carriers for damages occasioned by delay in the carriage of goods.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the legal remedies available to consumers in cases of delayed deliveries and sets a clear precedent for compensation in such situations.

Date of Decision: 09 November 2023

M/S. RAJASTHAN ART EMPORIUM  VS KUWAIT AIRWAYS & ANR. 

Latest Legal News