POCSO Trial Court Cannot Suo Motu Order Assistance Of Special Educator Without First Assessing Competency Of Victim: Madras High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Cannot Be Rejected On Ground Of Deceased Employee's Service Record If Not In Policy: Madhya Pradesh HC Limitation For Filing Written Statement In Commercial Suits Triggers From Service Of Summons With Plaint: Telangana High Court Administrative Order Using 'Unsatisfactory Performance' For Tenure Curtailment Not Stigmatic: Supreme Court ICAR Employees Do Not Hold 'Civil Posts', No Protection Under Article 311; No Enforceable Right To Complete Five-Year Tenure: Supreme Court Husband Cannot Claim Maintenance From Wife Under Section 144 BNSS (Section 125 CrPC): Allahabad High Court Imposes ₹15 Lakh Cost Divorce Petition Under Special Marriage Act Maintainable Even If Marriage Is Not Registered Under The Act: Karnataka High Court Section 82 CrPC Mandatory Procedure Must Be Strictly Followed To Declare A Person Proclaimed Offender: Punjab & Haryana High Court Schools Must Admit RTE Students Allotted By Govt Without Delay; Cannot Sit In Appeal Over State’s Decision: Supreme Court Insufficient Stamping Of Corporate Guarantee Is A Curable Defect, Won't Invalidate 'Financial Debt' Status Under IBC: Supreme Court Wildlife Species Ought Not To Be Confined To Cages Save In Exceptional Circumstances; Supreme Court Upholds Translocation Of Deer From Hauz Khas Park Digital Penetration Constitutes Rape Under Section 375(b) IPC; Degree Of Penetration Irrelevant: Bombay High Court (Goa Bench) Delhi High Court Denies Bail To 'Digital Arrest' Scam Accused; Says Mule Account Holders Are Important Cogs Of Conspiratorial Wheel Salary Is 'Property' Under Article 300-A, Cannot Be Withheld Without Due Process Of Law: Bombay High Court Inept Investigation Or Scripted Enquiry Fatal To Prosecution: Supreme Court Acquits 11 Convicts In Assam Murder Case Inconvenience Of Travel Not A Ground To Transfer Suit; Use Video Conferencing Or Commission For Evidence: Orissa High Court Part-Time Workers Serving For Decades Entitled To Regularization; 'Uma Devi' Ruling Cannot Be Weaponized To Deny Legitimate Claims: Rajasthan High Court Order Rejecting Or Allowing To Register FIR U/S Section 156(3) CrPC Application Is Not Interlocutory; Criminal Revision Is Maintainable: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation for Delay in Delivery of Handicraft Goods by Kuwait Airways

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has upheld compensation awarded for the delay in the delivery of consignments of handicraft goods by Kuwait Airways. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and Prashant Kumar Mishra, addresses a consumer dispute brought by M/S. Rajasthan Art Emporium against the airline.

The case revolved around the appellant, an exporter of handicraft goods, who had sent shipments to the USA, specifically to M/s. Williams Sonoma Inc. The shipments were meant to be delivered urgently, with a specified delivery schedule. However, the consignments did not reach their destination in Memphis, USA, as per the schedule, causing significant delays.

The appellant filed a complaint seeking compensation for the loss of business and reputation, as well as damages for the delay in delivering the goods. Initially, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) awarded compensation for the loss of goods, but the matter was appealed, leading to a reconsideration of the delay issue.

The NCDRC ultimately awarded compensation for the delay in delivering the consignment, taking into account the weight of the goods and relevant provisions of the Carriage by Air Act, 1972. The appellant, however, sought a larger compensation amount.

In its judgment, the Supreme Court upheld the NCDRC's decision on compensation, emphasizing the onus on the airline to prove that its agent had no authority to provide the delivery schedule. The Court also noted that the appellant's claim was limited to the amount initially sought in the complaint.

The ruling sets an important precedent for consumer disputes related to delayed deliveries and highlights the significance of adherence to delivery schedules in commercial transactions.

"Once the agent has issued a time schedule for delivery of consignment, it cannot be said that there is no material indicating that there was no agreement for delivery of the consignment in time," observed the Supreme Court.

The decision reaffirms the importance of timely delivery in business transactions and underscores the liability of carriers for damages occasioned by delay in the carriage of goods.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the legal remedies available to consumers in cases of delayed deliveries and sets a clear precedent for compensation in such situations.

Date of Decision: 09 November 2023

M/S. RAJASTHAN ART EMPORIUM  VS KUWAIT AIRWAYS & ANR. 

Latest Legal News