Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitral Award for Loss of Profit – Conflict with Public Policy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has struck down an arbitral award related to a claim for loss of profit in a construction contract, citing a conflict with public policy. The judgment, delivered on 19th October 2023, highlights the importance of adhering to established legal principles and the need for credible evidence to support such claims.

The bench, comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and S. Ravindra Bhat, found that the second arbitral award, which upheld the claim for loss of profit, was in direct conflict with the public policy of India. The court emphasized that public policy includes compliance with fundamental legal principles and precedents.

In the judgment, the court observed, "The award in question is patently illegal as it is based on no evidence and is, thus, outrightly perverse; therefore, it is in conflict with the 'public policy of India' as contemplated by Section 34(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act."

The case revolved around a construction contract that experienced delays not attributable to the claimant. The claimant, an established contractor handling substantial projects, sought compensation for loss of profit due to the project's prolonged completion. However, the court found that the claimant failed to provide credible evidence to substantiate the loss of profitability.

The judgment underscores the necessity for claimants to establish four key conditions for a successful claim of loss of profit: the presence of delay in contract completion, a lack of attribution of the delay to the claimant, the claimant's status as an established contractor, and the provision of credible evidence to support the loss of profit claim.

The court's decision reaffirms the principle that arbitration awards must adhere to fundamental legal principles and precedents and must not be based on unsupported claims. It highlights the importance of evidence-based decisions in arbitration proceedings.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the significance of public policy considerations in arbitral awards and sets a precedent for future cases involving claims for loss of profit in construction contracts.

 Date of Decision: 19 October 2023.

M/S UNIBROS vs ALL INDIA RADIO

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/19-Oct-2023-Unibros-Vs-All-India-Radio.pdf"]

Latest Legal News