Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitral Award for Loss of Profit – Conflict with Public Policy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has struck down an arbitral award related to a claim for loss of profit in a construction contract, citing a conflict with public policy. The judgment, delivered on 19th October 2023, highlights the importance of adhering to established legal principles and the need for credible evidence to support such claims.

The bench, comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and S. Ravindra Bhat, found that the second arbitral award, which upheld the claim for loss of profit, was in direct conflict with the public policy of India. The court emphasized that public policy includes compliance with fundamental legal principles and precedents.

In the judgment, the court observed, "The award in question is patently illegal as it is based on no evidence and is, thus, outrightly perverse; therefore, it is in conflict with the 'public policy of India' as contemplated by Section 34(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act."

The case revolved around a construction contract that experienced delays not attributable to the claimant. The claimant, an established contractor handling substantial projects, sought compensation for loss of profit due to the project's prolonged completion. However, the court found that the claimant failed to provide credible evidence to substantiate the loss of profitability.

The judgment underscores the necessity for claimants to establish four key conditions for a successful claim of loss of profit: the presence of delay in contract completion, a lack of attribution of the delay to the claimant, the claimant's status as an established contractor, and the provision of credible evidence to support the loss of profit claim.

The court's decision reaffirms the principle that arbitration awards must adhere to fundamental legal principles and precedents and must not be based on unsupported claims. It highlights the importance of evidence-based decisions in arbitration proceedings.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the significance of public policy considerations in arbitral awards and sets a precedent for future cases involving claims for loss of profit in construction contracts.

 Date of Decision: 19 October 2023.

M/S UNIBROS vs ALL INDIA RADIO

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/19-Oct-2023-Unibros-Vs-All-India-Radio.pdf"]

Latest Legal News