Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Arbitral Award for Loss of Profit – Conflict with Public Policy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has struck down an arbitral award related to a claim for loss of profit in a construction contract, citing a conflict with public policy. The judgment, delivered on 19th October 2023, highlights the importance of adhering to established legal principles and the need for credible evidence to support such claims.

The bench, comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and S. Ravindra Bhat, found that the second arbitral award, which upheld the claim for loss of profit, was in direct conflict with the public policy of India. The court emphasized that public policy includes compliance with fundamental legal principles and precedents.

In the judgment, the court observed, "The award in question is patently illegal as it is based on no evidence and is, thus, outrightly perverse; therefore, it is in conflict with the 'public policy of India' as contemplated by Section 34(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act."

The case revolved around a construction contract that experienced delays not attributable to the claimant. The claimant, an established contractor handling substantial projects, sought compensation for loss of profit due to the project's prolonged completion. However, the court found that the claimant failed to provide credible evidence to substantiate the loss of profitability.

The judgment underscores the necessity for claimants to establish four key conditions for a successful claim of loss of profit: the presence of delay in contract completion, a lack of attribution of the delay to the claimant, the claimant's status as an established contractor, and the provision of credible evidence to support the loss of profit claim.

The court's decision reaffirms the principle that arbitration awards must adhere to fundamental legal principles and precedents and must not be based on unsupported claims. It highlights the importance of evidence-based decisions in arbitration proceedings.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the significance of public policy considerations in arbitral awards and sets a precedent for future cases involving claims for loss of profit in construction contracts.

 Date of Decision: 19 October 2023.

M/S UNIBROS vs ALL INDIA RADIO

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/19-Oct-2023-Unibros-Vs-All-India-Radio.pdf"]

Latest Legal News